Cargando…
Symptomatic Carotid Atheroma Inflammation Lumen-stenosis score compared with Oxford and Essen risk scores to predict recurrent stroke in symptomatic carotid stenosis
BACKGROUND: The Oxford Carotid Stenosis tool (OCST) and Essen Stroke Risk Score (ESRS) are validated to predict recurrent stroke in patients with and without carotid stenosis. The Symptomatic Carotid Atheroma Inflammation Lumen stenosis (SCAIL) score combines stenosis and plaque inflammation on fluo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10683720/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37480278 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23969873231186911 |
_version_ | 1785151257135022080 |
---|---|
author | Gorey, Sarah McCabe, John J Camps-Renom, Pol Giannotti, Nicola McNulty, Jonathan P Barry, Mary Cassidy, Tim Cronin, Simon Dolan, Eamon Fernández-León, Alejandro Foley, Shane Harbison, Joseph O’Connell, Martin Williams, David J Marnane, Michael Martí-Fabregas, Joan Kelly, Peter J |
author_facet | Gorey, Sarah McCabe, John J Camps-Renom, Pol Giannotti, Nicola McNulty, Jonathan P Barry, Mary Cassidy, Tim Cronin, Simon Dolan, Eamon Fernández-León, Alejandro Foley, Shane Harbison, Joseph O’Connell, Martin Williams, David J Marnane, Michael Martí-Fabregas, Joan Kelly, Peter J |
author_sort | Gorey, Sarah |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Oxford Carotid Stenosis tool (OCST) and Essen Stroke Risk Score (ESRS) are validated to predict recurrent stroke in patients with and without carotid stenosis. The Symptomatic Carotid Atheroma Inflammation Lumen stenosis (SCAIL) score combines stenosis and plaque inflammation on fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography ((18)FDG-PET). We compared SCAIL with OCST and ESRS to predict ipsilateral stroke recurrence in symptomatic carotid stenosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We pooled three prospective cohort studies of patients with recent (<30 days) non-severe ischaemic stroke/TIA and internal carotid artery stenosis (>50%). All patients had carotid (18)FDG-PET/CT angiography and late follow-up, with censoring at carotid revascularisation. RESULTS: Of 212 included patients, 16 post-PET ipsilateral recurrent strokes occurred in 343 patient-years follow-up (median 42 days (IQR 13–815)). Baseline SCAIL predicted recurrent stroke (unadjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.96, CI 1.20–3.22, p = 0.007, adjusted HR 2.37, CI 1.31–4.29, p = 0.004). The HR for OCST was 0.996 (CI 0.987–1.006, p = 0.49) and for ESRS was 1.26 (CI 0.87–1.82, p = 0.23) (all per 1-point score increase). C-statistics were: SCAIL 0.66 (CI 0.51–0.80), OCST 0.52 (CI 0.40–0.64), ESRS 0.61 (CI 0.48–0.74). Compared with ESRS, addition of plaque inflammation (SUV(max)) to ESRS improved risk prediction when analysed continuously (HR 1.51, CI 1.05–2.16, p = 0.03) and categorically (p(trend) = 0.005 for risk increase across groups; HR 3.31, CI 1.42–7.72, p = 0.006; net reclassification improvement 10%). Findings were unchanged by further addition of carotid stenosis. CONCLUSIONS: SCAIL predicted recurrent stroke, had discrimination better than chance, and improved the prognostic utility of ESRS, suggesting that measuring plaque inflammation may improve risk stratification in carotid stenosis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10683720 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106837202023-11-30 Symptomatic Carotid Atheroma Inflammation Lumen-stenosis score compared with Oxford and Essen risk scores to predict recurrent stroke in symptomatic carotid stenosis Gorey, Sarah McCabe, John J Camps-Renom, Pol Giannotti, Nicola McNulty, Jonathan P Barry, Mary Cassidy, Tim Cronin, Simon Dolan, Eamon Fernández-León, Alejandro Foley, Shane Harbison, Joseph O’Connell, Martin Williams, David J Marnane, Michael Martí-Fabregas, Joan Kelly, Peter J Eur Stroke J Original Research Articles BACKGROUND: The Oxford Carotid Stenosis tool (OCST) and Essen Stroke Risk Score (ESRS) are validated to predict recurrent stroke in patients with and without carotid stenosis. The Symptomatic Carotid Atheroma Inflammation Lumen stenosis (SCAIL) score combines stenosis and plaque inflammation on fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography ((18)FDG-PET). We compared SCAIL with OCST and ESRS to predict ipsilateral stroke recurrence in symptomatic carotid stenosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We pooled three prospective cohort studies of patients with recent (<30 days) non-severe ischaemic stroke/TIA and internal carotid artery stenosis (>50%). All patients had carotid (18)FDG-PET/CT angiography and late follow-up, with censoring at carotid revascularisation. RESULTS: Of 212 included patients, 16 post-PET ipsilateral recurrent strokes occurred in 343 patient-years follow-up (median 42 days (IQR 13–815)). Baseline SCAIL predicted recurrent stroke (unadjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.96, CI 1.20–3.22, p = 0.007, adjusted HR 2.37, CI 1.31–4.29, p = 0.004). The HR for OCST was 0.996 (CI 0.987–1.006, p = 0.49) and for ESRS was 1.26 (CI 0.87–1.82, p = 0.23) (all per 1-point score increase). C-statistics were: SCAIL 0.66 (CI 0.51–0.80), OCST 0.52 (CI 0.40–0.64), ESRS 0.61 (CI 0.48–0.74). Compared with ESRS, addition of plaque inflammation (SUV(max)) to ESRS improved risk prediction when analysed continuously (HR 1.51, CI 1.05–2.16, p = 0.03) and categorically (p(trend) = 0.005 for risk increase across groups; HR 3.31, CI 1.42–7.72, p = 0.006; net reclassification improvement 10%). Findings were unchanged by further addition of carotid stenosis. CONCLUSIONS: SCAIL predicted recurrent stroke, had discrimination better than chance, and improved the prognostic utility of ESRS, suggesting that measuring plaque inflammation may improve risk stratification in carotid stenosis. SAGE Publications 2023-07-22 2023-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10683720/ /pubmed/37480278 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23969873231186911 Text en © European Stroke Organisation 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Articles Gorey, Sarah McCabe, John J Camps-Renom, Pol Giannotti, Nicola McNulty, Jonathan P Barry, Mary Cassidy, Tim Cronin, Simon Dolan, Eamon Fernández-León, Alejandro Foley, Shane Harbison, Joseph O’Connell, Martin Williams, David J Marnane, Michael Martí-Fabregas, Joan Kelly, Peter J Symptomatic Carotid Atheroma Inflammation Lumen-stenosis score compared with Oxford and Essen risk scores to predict recurrent stroke in symptomatic carotid stenosis |
title | Symptomatic Carotid Atheroma Inflammation Lumen-stenosis score compared with Oxford and Essen risk scores to predict recurrent stroke in symptomatic carotid stenosis |
title_full | Symptomatic Carotid Atheroma Inflammation Lumen-stenosis score compared with Oxford and Essen risk scores to predict recurrent stroke in symptomatic carotid stenosis |
title_fullStr | Symptomatic Carotid Atheroma Inflammation Lumen-stenosis score compared with Oxford and Essen risk scores to predict recurrent stroke in symptomatic carotid stenosis |
title_full_unstemmed | Symptomatic Carotid Atheroma Inflammation Lumen-stenosis score compared with Oxford and Essen risk scores to predict recurrent stroke in symptomatic carotid stenosis |
title_short | Symptomatic Carotid Atheroma Inflammation Lumen-stenosis score compared with Oxford and Essen risk scores to predict recurrent stroke in symptomatic carotid stenosis |
title_sort | symptomatic carotid atheroma inflammation lumen-stenosis score compared with oxford and essen risk scores to predict recurrent stroke in symptomatic carotid stenosis |
topic | Original Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10683720/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37480278 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23969873231186911 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT goreysarah symptomaticcarotidatheromainflammationlumenstenosisscorecomparedwithoxfordandessenriskscorestopredictrecurrentstrokeinsymptomaticcarotidstenosis AT mccabejohnj symptomaticcarotidatheromainflammationlumenstenosisscorecomparedwithoxfordandessenriskscorestopredictrecurrentstrokeinsymptomaticcarotidstenosis AT campsrenompol symptomaticcarotidatheromainflammationlumenstenosisscorecomparedwithoxfordandessenriskscorestopredictrecurrentstrokeinsymptomaticcarotidstenosis AT giannottinicola symptomaticcarotidatheromainflammationlumenstenosisscorecomparedwithoxfordandessenriskscorestopredictrecurrentstrokeinsymptomaticcarotidstenosis AT mcnultyjonathanp symptomaticcarotidatheromainflammationlumenstenosisscorecomparedwithoxfordandessenriskscorestopredictrecurrentstrokeinsymptomaticcarotidstenosis AT barrymary symptomaticcarotidatheromainflammationlumenstenosisscorecomparedwithoxfordandessenriskscorestopredictrecurrentstrokeinsymptomaticcarotidstenosis AT cassidytim symptomaticcarotidatheromainflammationlumenstenosisscorecomparedwithoxfordandessenriskscorestopredictrecurrentstrokeinsymptomaticcarotidstenosis AT croninsimon symptomaticcarotidatheromainflammationlumenstenosisscorecomparedwithoxfordandessenriskscorestopredictrecurrentstrokeinsymptomaticcarotidstenosis AT dolaneamon symptomaticcarotidatheromainflammationlumenstenosisscorecomparedwithoxfordandessenriskscorestopredictrecurrentstrokeinsymptomaticcarotidstenosis AT fernandezleonalejandro symptomaticcarotidatheromainflammationlumenstenosisscorecomparedwithoxfordandessenriskscorestopredictrecurrentstrokeinsymptomaticcarotidstenosis AT foleyshane symptomaticcarotidatheromainflammationlumenstenosisscorecomparedwithoxfordandessenriskscorestopredictrecurrentstrokeinsymptomaticcarotidstenosis AT harbisonjoseph symptomaticcarotidatheromainflammationlumenstenosisscorecomparedwithoxfordandessenriskscorestopredictrecurrentstrokeinsymptomaticcarotidstenosis AT oconnellmartin symptomaticcarotidatheromainflammationlumenstenosisscorecomparedwithoxfordandessenriskscorestopredictrecurrentstrokeinsymptomaticcarotidstenosis AT williamsdavidj symptomaticcarotidatheromainflammationlumenstenosisscorecomparedwithoxfordandessenriskscorestopredictrecurrentstrokeinsymptomaticcarotidstenosis AT marnanemichael symptomaticcarotidatheromainflammationlumenstenosisscorecomparedwithoxfordandessenriskscorestopredictrecurrentstrokeinsymptomaticcarotidstenosis AT martifabregasjoan symptomaticcarotidatheromainflammationlumenstenosisscorecomparedwithoxfordandessenriskscorestopredictrecurrentstrokeinsymptomaticcarotidstenosis AT kellypeterj symptomaticcarotidatheromainflammationlumenstenosisscorecomparedwithoxfordandessenriskscorestopredictrecurrentstrokeinsymptomaticcarotidstenosis |