Cargando…

Comparison of salivary flow rate and pH between healthy subjects and tobacco and areca nut chewers

INTRODUCTION: Tobacco and areca nuts release carcinogens, which cause alterations in saliva. Evaluation of these changes through estimation of salivary flow rate and pH was performed in tobacco and areca nut chewers and apparently healthy subjects. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study group for this comp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jain, Kanu, Gakhar, Rajnish, Bhatia, Shagun, Manjunatha, Bhari Sharanesha, Jindal, Deepti, Jindal, Varun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10683918/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033965
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jomfp.jomfp_518_22
_version_ 1785151289707986944
author Jain, Kanu
Gakhar, Rajnish
Bhatia, Shagun
Manjunatha, Bhari Sharanesha
Jindal, Deepti
Jindal, Varun
author_facet Jain, Kanu
Gakhar, Rajnish
Bhatia, Shagun
Manjunatha, Bhari Sharanesha
Jindal, Deepti
Jindal, Varun
author_sort Jain, Kanu
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Tobacco and areca nuts release carcinogens, which cause alterations in saliva. Evaluation of these changes through estimation of salivary flow rate and pH was performed in tobacco and areca nut chewers and apparently healthy subjects. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study group for this comparative study comprised 60 subjects with 20 areca nut chewers (group 1), 20 tobacco chewers (group 2), and 20 non-tobacco and areca nut chewers (group 3) in the ages between 18 and 75 years. After collection of saliva from each subject, the salivary flow rate (SFR) was measured by using graduated tubes, whereas salivary pH was measured using a digital salivary pH meter. Tukey HSD post hoc test was performed for comparison of mean SFR and mean pH between study group subjects. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was used to find the mean difference in SFR and pH in duration, intensity, and frequency among various types of areca nut and tobacco users. A ”P” value of less than 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. RESULTS: The mean age among groups 1, 2, and 3 was 37.70 ± 10.44, 39.75 ± 10.16, and 37.90 ± 10.52 years, respectively, with a statistically insignificant difference. The mean salivary flow rate (ml/20 min) was maximum in group 3 (13.23), followed by group 2 (11.75) and group 1 (10.48), with the statistically significant difference as P < 0.05. The mean salivary pH was maximum in group 3 (7.07), followed by group 2 (6.86) and group 1 (6.49), with the statistically significant difference as P < 0.05. CONCLUSION: Long-term use of tobacco and areca nuts in a chewable form can significantly reduce the salivary flow rate and salivary pH. Hence, these measurements can be used as chair side, non-invasive measures for assessing pathological changes in oral mucosa linked to vulnerable effects among people addicted to these adverse habits; thereby, early re-organization can prevent mobility and mortality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10683918
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106839182023-11-30 Comparison of salivary flow rate and pH between healthy subjects and tobacco and areca nut chewers Jain, Kanu Gakhar, Rajnish Bhatia, Shagun Manjunatha, Bhari Sharanesha Jindal, Deepti Jindal, Varun J Oral Maxillofac Pathol Original Article INTRODUCTION: Tobacco and areca nuts release carcinogens, which cause alterations in saliva. Evaluation of these changes through estimation of salivary flow rate and pH was performed in tobacco and areca nut chewers and apparently healthy subjects. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study group for this comparative study comprised 60 subjects with 20 areca nut chewers (group 1), 20 tobacco chewers (group 2), and 20 non-tobacco and areca nut chewers (group 3) in the ages between 18 and 75 years. After collection of saliva from each subject, the salivary flow rate (SFR) was measured by using graduated tubes, whereas salivary pH was measured using a digital salivary pH meter. Tukey HSD post hoc test was performed for comparison of mean SFR and mean pH between study group subjects. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was used to find the mean difference in SFR and pH in duration, intensity, and frequency among various types of areca nut and tobacco users. A ”P” value of less than 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. RESULTS: The mean age among groups 1, 2, and 3 was 37.70 ± 10.44, 39.75 ± 10.16, and 37.90 ± 10.52 years, respectively, with a statistically insignificant difference. The mean salivary flow rate (ml/20 min) was maximum in group 3 (13.23), followed by group 2 (11.75) and group 1 (10.48), with the statistically significant difference as P < 0.05. The mean salivary pH was maximum in group 3 (7.07), followed by group 2 (6.86) and group 1 (6.49), with the statistically significant difference as P < 0.05. CONCLUSION: Long-term use of tobacco and areca nuts in a chewable form can significantly reduce the salivary flow rate and salivary pH. Hence, these measurements can be used as chair side, non-invasive measures for assessing pathological changes in oral mucosa linked to vulnerable effects among people addicted to these adverse habits; thereby, early re-organization can prevent mobility and mortality. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023 2023-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10683918/ /pubmed/38033965 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jomfp.jomfp_518_22 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Jain, Kanu
Gakhar, Rajnish
Bhatia, Shagun
Manjunatha, Bhari Sharanesha
Jindal, Deepti
Jindal, Varun
Comparison of salivary flow rate and pH between healthy subjects and tobacco and areca nut chewers
title Comparison of salivary flow rate and pH between healthy subjects and tobacco and areca nut chewers
title_full Comparison of salivary flow rate and pH between healthy subjects and tobacco and areca nut chewers
title_fullStr Comparison of salivary flow rate and pH between healthy subjects and tobacco and areca nut chewers
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of salivary flow rate and pH between healthy subjects and tobacco and areca nut chewers
title_short Comparison of salivary flow rate and pH between healthy subjects and tobacco and areca nut chewers
title_sort comparison of salivary flow rate and ph between healthy subjects and tobacco and areca nut chewers
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10683918/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033965
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jomfp.jomfp_518_22
work_keys_str_mv AT jainkanu comparisonofsalivaryflowrateandphbetweenhealthysubjectsandtobaccoandarecanutchewers
AT gakharrajnish comparisonofsalivaryflowrateandphbetweenhealthysubjectsandtobaccoandarecanutchewers
AT bhatiashagun comparisonofsalivaryflowrateandphbetweenhealthysubjectsandtobaccoandarecanutchewers
AT manjunathabharisharanesha comparisonofsalivaryflowrateandphbetweenhealthysubjectsandtobaccoandarecanutchewers
AT jindaldeepti comparisonofsalivaryflowrateandphbetweenhealthysubjectsandtobaccoandarecanutchewers
AT jindalvarun comparisonofsalivaryflowrateandphbetweenhealthysubjectsandtobaccoandarecanutchewers