Cargando…

Discriminant analysis as a tool to classify farm hay in dairy farms

Hay is one of the primary constituents of ruminant feed, and rapid classification systems of nutritional value are essential. A reliable approach to evaluating hay quality is a combination of visual combined inspection by NIRS analysis. The analysis was carried out on 1,639 samples of hay collected...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dal Prà, Aldo, Bozzi, Riccardo, Parrini, Silvia, Immovilli, Alessandra, Davolio, Roberto, Ruozzi, Fabrizio, Fabbri, Maria Chiara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10684012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38015887
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0294468
_version_ 1785151308350619648
author Dal Prà, Aldo
Bozzi, Riccardo
Parrini, Silvia
Immovilli, Alessandra
Davolio, Roberto
Ruozzi, Fabrizio
Fabbri, Maria Chiara
author_facet Dal Prà, Aldo
Bozzi, Riccardo
Parrini, Silvia
Immovilli, Alessandra
Davolio, Roberto
Ruozzi, Fabrizio
Fabbri, Maria Chiara
author_sort Dal Prà, Aldo
collection PubMed
description Hay is one of the primary constituents of ruminant feed, and rapid classification systems of nutritional value are essential. A reliable approach to evaluating hay quality is a combination of visual combined inspection by NIRS analysis. The analysis was carried out on 1,639 samples of hay collected from 2016 to 2021 in northern Italy. Discriminant analysis (DAPC) on five hay types (FOM, forage mixtures; APG, first alfalfa cutting with prevalence of graminaceous >50%; PRA, prevailing alfalfa >50%; PUA, purity alfalfa >95%; and PEM, permanent meadows) was performed by ex-ante visual inspection categorization and NIRS analysis. This study aimed to provide a complementary method to differentiate hay types and classify unknown samples. Two scenarios were used: i) all data were used for model training, and the discriminant functions were extracted based on all samples; ii) the assignment of each group was assessed without samples belonging to the training set group. DAPC model resulted in an overall assignment success rate of 66%; precisely, the success was 84, 79, 69, 37, and 27% for PUA, FOM, PRA, APG, and PEM, respectively. In the second scenario, three groups showed percentages of posterior assignment probability higher than 70% to only one group: PUA with PRA (~ 99%), PRA with PUA (~71%), and PEM with FOM (~75%). Discriminant analysis can be successfully used to differentiate hay types and could also be used to assess factors related to hay quality in addition to NIRS analysis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10684012
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106840122023-11-30 Discriminant analysis as a tool to classify farm hay in dairy farms Dal Prà, Aldo Bozzi, Riccardo Parrini, Silvia Immovilli, Alessandra Davolio, Roberto Ruozzi, Fabrizio Fabbri, Maria Chiara PLoS One Research Article Hay is one of the primary constituents of ruminant feed, and rapid classification systems of nutritional value are essential. A reliable approach to evaluating hay quality is a combination of visual combined inspection by NIRS analysis. The analysis was carried out on 1,639 samples of hay collected from 2016 to 2021 in northern Italy. Discriminant analysis (DAPC) on five hay types (FOM, forage mixtures; APG, first alfalfa cutting with prevalence of graminaceous >50%; PRA, prevailing alfalfa >50%; PUA, purity alfalfa >95%; and PEM, permanent meadows) was performed by ex-ante visual inspection categorization and NIRS analysis. This study aimed to provide a complementary method to differentiate hay types and classify unknown samples. Two scenarios were used: i) all data were used for model training, and the discriminant functions were extracted based on all samples; ii) the assignment of each group was assessed without samples belonging to the training set group. DAPC model resulted in an overall assignment success rate of 66%; precisely, the success was 84, 79, 69, 37, and 27% for PUA, FOM, PRA, APG, and PEM, respectively. In the second scenario, three groups showed percentages of posterior assignment probability higher than 70% to only one group: PUA with PRA (~ 99%), PRA with PUA (~71%), and PEM with FOM (~75%). Discriminant analysis can be successfully used to differentiate hay types and could also be used to assess factors related to hay quality in addition to NIRS analysis. Public Library of Science 2023-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10684012/ /pubmed/38015887 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0294468 Text en © 2023 Dal Prà et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dal Prà, Aldo
Bozzi, Riccardo
Parrini, Silvia
Immovilli, Alessandra
Davolio, Roberto
Ruozzi, Fabrizio
Fabbri, Maria Chiara
Discriminant analysis as a tool to classify farm hay in dairy farms
title Discriminant analysis as a tool to classify farm hay in dairy farms
title_full Discriminant analysis as a tool to classify farm hay in dairy farms
title_fullStr Discriminant analysis as a tool to classify farm hay in dairy farms
title_full_unstemmed Discriminant analysis as a tool to classify farm hay in dairy farms
title_short Discriminant analysis as a tool to classify farm hay in dairy farms
title_sort discriminant analysis as a tool to classify farm hay in dairy farms
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10684012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38015887
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0294468
work_keys_str_mv AT dalpraaldo discriminantanalysisasatooltoclassifyfarmhayindairyfarms
AT bozziriccardo discriminantanalysisasatooltoclassifyfarmhayindairyfarms
AT parrinisilvia discriminantanalysisasatooltoclassifyfarmhayindairyfarms
AT immovillialessandra discriminantanalysisasatooltoclassifyfarmhayindairyfarms
AT davolioroberto discriminantanalysisasatooltoclassifyfarmhayindairyfarms
AT ruozzifabrizio discriminantanalysisasatooltoclassifyfarmhayindairyfarms
AT fabbrimariachiara discriminantanalysisasatooltoclassifyfarmhayindairyfarms