Cargando…
Systematic Review to Inform a World Health Organization (WHO) Clinical Practice Guideline: Benefits and Harms of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for Chronic Primary Low Back Pain in Adults
PURPOSE: To evaluate benefits and harms of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for chronic primary low back pain (CPLBP) in adults to inform a World Health Organization (WHO) standard clinical guideline. METHODS: We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from various electro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10684422/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37991646 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10926-023-10121-7 |
_version_ | 1785151400233140224 |
---|---|
author | Verville, Leslie Hincapié, Cesar A. Southerst, Danielle Yu, Hainan Bussières, André Gross, Douglas P. Pereira, Paulo Mior, Silvano Tricco, Andrea C. Cedraschi, Christine Brunton, Ginny Nordin, Margareta Connell, Gaelan Shearer, Heather M. Wong, Jessica J. Hofstetter, Léonie Romanelli, Andrew Guist, Brett To, Daphne Stuber, Kent da Silva-Oolup, Sophia Stupar, Maja Myrtos, Danny Lee, Joyce G.B. DeSouza, Astrid Muñoz Laguna, Javier Murnaghan, Kent Cancelliere, Carol |
author_facet | Verville, Leslie Hincapié, Cesar A. Southerst, Danielle Yu, Hainan Bussières, André Gross, Douglas P. Pereira, Paulo Mior, Silvano Tricco, Andrea C. Cedraschi, Christine Brunton, Ginny Nordin, Margareta Connell, Gaelan Shearer, Heather M. Wong, Jessica J. Hofstetter, Léonie Romanelli, Andrew Guist, Brett To, Daphne Stuber, Kent da Silva-Oolup, Sophia Stupar, Maja Myrtos, Danny Lee, Joyce G.B. DeSouza, Astrid Muñoz Laguna, Javier Murnaghan, Kent Cancelliere, Carol |
author_sort | Verville, Leslie |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To evaluate benefits and harms of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for chronic primary low back pain (CPLBP) in adults to inform a World Health Organization (WHO) standard clinical guideline. METHODS: We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from various electronic databases from July 1, 2007 to March 9, 2022. Eligible RCTs targeted TENS compared to placebo/sham, usual care, no intervention, or interventions with isolated TENS effects (i.e., combined TENS with treatment B versus treatment B alone) in adults with CPLBP. We extracted outcomes requested by the WHO Guideline Development Group, appraised the risk of bias, conducted meta-analyses where appropriate, and graded the certainty of evidence using GRADE. RESULTS: Seventeen RCTs (adults, n = 1027; adults ≥ 60 years, n = 28) out of 2010 records and 89 full text RCTs screened were included. The evidence suggested that TENS resulted in a marginal reduction in pain compared to sham (9 RCTs) in the immediate term (2 weeks) (mean difference (MD) = -0.90, 95% confidence interval -1.54 to -0.26), and a reduction in pain catastrophizing in the short term (3 months) with TENS versus no intervention or interventions with TENS specific effects (1 RCT) (MD = -11.20, 95% CI -17.88 to -3.52). For other outcomes, little or no difference was found between TENS and the comparison interventions. The certainty of the evidence for all outcomes was very low. CONCLUSIONS: Based on very low certainty evidence, TENS resulted in brief and marginal reductions in pain (not deemed clinically important) and a short-term reduction in pain catastrophizing in adults with CPLBP, while little to no differences were found for other outcomes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10926-023-10121-7. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10684422 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106844222023-11-30 Systematic Review to Inform a World Health Organization (WHO) Clinical Practice Guideline: Benefits and Harms of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for Chronic Primary Low Back Pain in Adults Verville, Leslie Hincapié, Cesar A. Southerst, Danielle Yu, Hainan Bussières, André Gross, Douglas P. Pereira, Paulo Mior, Silvano Tricco, Andrea C. Cedraschi, Christine Brunton, Ginny Nordin, Margareta Connell, Gaelan Shearer, Heather M. Wong, Jessica J. Hofstetter, Léonie Romanelli, Andrew Guist, Brett To, Daphne Stuber, Kent da Silva-Oolup, Sophia Stupar, Maja Myrtos, Danny Lee, Joyce G.B. DeSouza, Astrid Muñoz Laguna, Javier Murnaghan, Kent Cancelliere, Carol J Occup Rehabil Article PURPOSE: To evaluate benefits and harms of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for chronic primary low back pain (CPLBP) in adults to inform a World Health Organization (WHO) standard clinical guideline. METHODS: We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from various electronic databases from July 1, 2007 to March 9, 2022. Eligible RCTs targeted TENS compared to placebo/sham, usual care, no intervention, or interventions with isolated TENS effects (i.e., combined TENS with treatment B versus treatment B alone) in adults with CPLBP. We extracted outcomes requested by the WHO Guideline Development Group, appraised the risk of bias, conducted meta-analyses where appropriate, and graded the certainty of evidence using GRADE. RESULTS: Seventeen RCTs (adults, n = 1027; adults ≥ 60 years, n = 28) out of 2010 records and 89 full text RCTs screened were included. The evidence suggested that TENS resulted in a marginal reduction in pain compared to sham (9 RCTs) in the immediate term (2 weeks) (mean difference (MD) = -0.90, 95% confidence interval -1.54 to -0.26), and a reduction in pain catastrophizing in the short term (3 months) with TENS versus no intervention or interventions with TENS specific effects (1 RCT) (MD = -11.20, 95% CI -17.88 to -3.52). For other outcomes, little or no difference was found between TENS and the comparison interventions. The certainty of the evidence for all outcomes was very low. CONCLUSIONS: Based on very low certainty evidence, TENS resulted in brief and marginal reductions in pain (not deemed clinically important) and a short-term reduction in pain catastrophizing in adults with CPLBP, while little to no differences were found for other outcomes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10926-023-10121-7. Springer US 2023-11-22 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10684422/ /pubmed/37991646 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10926-023-10121-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Verville, Leslie Hincapié, Cesar A. Southerst, Danielle Yu, Hainan Bussières, André Gross, Douglas P. Pereira, Paulo Mior, Silvano Tricco, Andrea C. Cedraschi, Christine Brunton, Ginny Nordin, Margareta Connell, Gaelan Shearer, Heather M. Wong, Jessica J. Hofstetter, Léonie Romanelli, Andrew Guist, Brett To, Daphne Stuber, Kent da Silva-Oolup, Sophia Stupar, Maja Myrtos, Danny Lee, Joyce G.B. DeSouza, Astrid Muñoz Laguna, Javier Murnaghan, Kent Cancelliere, Carol Systematic Review to Inform a World Health Organization (WHO) Clinical Practice Guideline: Benefits and Harms of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for Chronic Primary Low Back Pain in Adults |
title | Systematic Review to Inform a World Health Organization (WHO) Clinical Practice Guideline: Benefits and Harms of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for Chronic Primary Low Back Pain in Adults |
title_full | Systematic Review to Inform a World Health Organization (WHO) Clinical Practice Guideline: Benefits and Harms of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for Chronic Primary Low Back Pain in Adults |
title_fullStr | Systematic Review to Inform a World Health Organization (WHO) Clinical Practice Guideline: Benefits and Harms of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for Chronic Primary Low Back Pain in Adults |
title_full_unstemmed | Systematic Review to Inform a World Health Organization (WHO) Clinical Practice Guideline: Benefits and Harms of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for Chronic Primary Low Back Pain in Adults |
title_short | Systematic Review to Inform a World Health Organization (WHO) Clinical Practice Guideline: Benefits and Harms of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for Chronic Primary Low Back Pain in Adults |
title_sort | systematic review to inform a world health organization (who) clinical practice guideline: benefits and harms of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (tens) for chronic primary low back pain in adults |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10684422/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37991646 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10926-023-10121-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vervilleleslie systematicreviewtoinformaworldhealthorganizationwhoclinicalpracticeguidelinebenefitsandharmsoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationtensforchronicprimarylowbackpaininadults AT hincapiecesara systematicreviewtoinformaworldhealthorganizationwhoclinicalpracticeguidelinebenefitsandharmsoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationtensforchronicprimarylowbackpaininadults AT southerstdanielle systematicreviewtoinformaworldhealthorganizationwhoclinicalpracticeguidelinebenefitsandharmsoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationtensforchronicprimarylowbackpaininadults AT yuhainan systematicreviewtoinformaworldhealthorganizationwhoclinicalpracticeguidelinebenefitsandharmsoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationtensforchronicprimarylowbackpaininadults AT bussieresandre systematicreviewtoinformaworldhealthorganizationwhoclinicalpracticeguidelinebenefitsandharmsoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationtensforchronicprimarylowbackpaininadults AT grossdouglasp systematicreviewtoinformaworldhealthorganizationwhoclinicalpracticeguidelinebenefitsandharmsoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationtensforchronicprimarylowbackpaininadults AT pereirapaulo systematicreviewtoinformaworldhealthorganizationwhoclinicalpracticeguidelinebenefitsandharmsoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationtensforchronicprimarylowbackpaininadults AT miorsilvano systematicreviewtoinformaworldhealthorganizationwhoclinicalpracticeguidelinebenefitsandharmsoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationtensforchronicprimarylowbackpaininadults AT triccoandreac systematicreviewtoinformaworldhealthorganizationwhoclinicalpracticeguidelinebenefitsandharmsoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationtensforchronicprimarylowbackpaininadults AT cedraschichristine systematicreviewtoinformaworldhealthorganizationwhoclinicalpracticeguidelinebenefitsandharmsoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationtensforchronicprimarylowbackpaininadults AT bruntonginny systematicreviewtoinformaworldhealthorganizationwhoclinicalpracticeguidelinebenefitsandharmsoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationtensforchronicprimarylowbackpaininadults AT nordinmargareta systematicreviewtoinformaworldhealthorganizationwhoclinicalpracticeguidelinebenefitsandharmsoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationtensforchronicprimarylowbackpaininadults AT connellgaelan systematicreviewtoinformaworldhealthorganizationwhoclinicalpracticeguidelinebenefitsandharmsoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationtensforchronicprimarylowbackpaininadults AT shearerheatherm systematicreviewtoinformaworldhealthorganizationwhoclinicalpracticeguidelinebenefitsandharmsoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationtensforchronicprimarylowbackpaininadults AT wongjessicaj systematicreviewtoinformaworldhealthorganizationwhoclinicalpracticeguidelinebenefitsandharmsoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationtensforchronicprimarylowbackpaininadults AT hofstetterleonie systematicreviewtoinformaworldhealthorganizationwhoclinicalpracticeguidelinebenefitsandharmsoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationtensforchronicprimarylowbackpaininadults AT romanelliandrew systematicreviewtoinformaworldhealthorganizationwhoclinicalpracticeguidelinebenefitsandharmsoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationtensforchronicprimarylowbackpaininadults AT guistbrett systematicreviewtoinformaworldhealthorganizationwhoclinicalpracticeguidelinebenefitsandharmsoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationtensforchronicprimarylowbackpaininadults AT todaphne systematicreviewtoinformaworldhealthorganizationwhoclinicalpracticeguidelinebenefitsandharmsoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationtensforchronicprimarylowbackpaininadults AT stuberkent systematicreviewtoinformaworldhealthorganizationwhoclinicalpracticeguidelinebenefitsandharmsoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationtensforchronicprimarylowbackpaininadults AT dasilvaoolupsophia systematicreviewtoinformaworldhealthorganizationwhoclinicalpracticeguidelinebenefitsandharmsoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationtensforchronicprimarylowbackpaininadults AT stuparmaja systematicreviewtoinformaworldhealthorganizationwhoclinicalpracticeguidelinebenefitsandharmsoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationtensforchronicprimarylowbackpaininadults AT myrtosdanny systematicreviewtoinformaworldhealthorganizationwhoclinicalpracticeguidelinebenefitsandharmsoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationtensforchronicprimarylowbackpaininadults AT leejoycegb systematicreviewtoinformaworldhealthorganizationwhoclinicalpracticeguidelinebenefitsandharmsoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationtensforchronicprimarylowbackpaininadults AT desouzaastrid systematicreviewtoinformaworldhealthorganizationwhoclinicalpracticeguidelinebenefitsandharmsoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationtensforchronicprimarylowbackpaininadults AT munozlagunajavier systematicreviewtoinformaworldhealthorganizationwhoclinicalpracticeguidelinebenefitsandharmsoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationtensforchronicprimarylowbackpaininadults AT murnaghankent systematicreviewtoinformaworldhealthorganizationwhoclinicalpracticeguidelinebenefitsandharmsoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationtensforchronicprimarylowbackpaininadults AT cancellierecarol systematicreviewtoinformaworldhealthorganizationwhoclinicalpracticeguidelinebenefitsandharmsoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationtensforchronicprimarylowbackpaininadults |