Cargando…

Systematic Review to Inform a World Health Organization (WHO) Clinical Practice Guideline: Benefits and Harms of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for Chronic Primary Low Back Pain in Adults

PURPOSE: To evaluate benefits and harms of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for chronic primary low back pain (CPLBP) in adults to inform a World Health Organization (WHO) standard clinical guideline. METHODS: We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from various electro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Verville, Leslie, Hincapié, Cesar A., Southerst, Danielle, Yu, Hainan, Bussières, André, Gross, Douglas P., Pereira, Paulo, Mior, Silvano, Tricco, Andrea C., Cedraschi, Christine, Brunton, Ginny, Nordin, Margareta, Connell, Gaelan, Shearer, Heather M., Wong, Jessica J., Hofstetter, Léonie, Romanelli, Andrew, Guist, Brett, To, Daphne, Stuber, Kent, da Silva-Oolup, Sophia, Stupar, Maja, Myrtos, Danny, Lee, Joyce G.B., DeSouza, Astrid, Muñoz Laguna, Javier, Murnaghan, Kent, Cancelliere, Carol
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10684422/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37991646
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10926-023-10121-7
_version_ 1785151400233140224
author Verville, Leslie
Hincapié, Cesar A.
Southerst, Danielle
Yu, Hainan
Bussières, André
Gross, Douglas P.
Pereira, Paulo
Mior, Silvano
Tricco, Andrea C.
Cedraschi, Christine
Brunton, Ginny
Nordin, Margareta
Connell, Gaelan
Shearer, Heather M.
Wong, Jessica J.
Hofstetter, Léonie
Romanelli, Andrew
Guist, Brett
To, Daphne
Stuber, Kent
da Silva-Oolup, Sophia
Stupar, Maja
Myrtos, Danny
Lee, Joyce G.B.
DeSouza, Astrid
Muñoz Laguna, Javier
Murnaghan, Kent
Cancelliere, Carol
author_facet Verville, Leslie
Hincapié, Cesar A.
Southerst, Danielle
Yu, Hainan
Bussières, André
Gross, Douglas P.
Pereira, Paulo
Mior, Silvano
Tricco, Andrea C.
Cedraschi, Christine
Brunton, Ginny
Nordin, Margareta
Connell, Gaelan
Shearer, Heather M.
Wong, Jessica J.
Hofstetter, Léonie
Romanelli, Andrew
Guist, Brett
To, Daphne
Stuber, Kent
da Silva-Oolup, Sophia
Stupar, Maja
Myrtos, Danny
Lee, Joyce G.B.
DeSouza, Astrid
Muñoz Laguna, Javier
Murnaghan, Kent
Cancelliere, Carol
author_sort Verville, Leslie
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate benefits and harms of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for chronic primary low back pain (CPLBP) in adults to inform a World Health Organization (WHO) standard clinical guideline. METHODS: We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from various electronic databases from July 1, 2007 to March 9, 2022. Eligible RCTs targeted TENS compared to placebo/sham, usual care, no intervention, or interventions with isolated TENS effects (i.e., combined TENS with treatment B versus treatment B alone) in adults with CPLBP. We extracted outcomes requested by the WHO Guideline Development Group, appraised the risk of bias, conducted meta-analyses where appropriate, and graded the certainty of evidence using GRADE. RESULTS: Seventeen RCTs (adults, n = 1027; adults ≥ 60 years, n = 28) out of 2010 records and 89 full text RCTs screened were included. The evidence suggested that TENS resulted in a marginal reduction in pain compared to sham (9 RCTs) in the immediate term (2 weeks) (mean difference (MD) = -0.90, 95% confidence interval  -1.54 to -0.26), and a reduction in pain catastrophizing in the short term (3 months) with TENS versus no intervention or interventions with TENS specific effects (1 RCT) (MD = -11.20, 95% CI -17.88 to -3.52). For other outcomes, little or no difference was found between TENS and the comparison interventions. The certainty of the evidence for all outcomes was very low. CONCLUSIONS: Based on very low certainty evidence, TENS resulted in brief and marginal reductions in pain (not deemed clinically important) and a short-term reduction in pain catastrophizing in adults with CPLBP, while little to no differences were found for other outcomes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10926-023-10121-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10684422
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106844222023-11-30 Systematic Review to Inform a World Health Organization (WHO) Clinical Practice Guideline: Benefits and Harms of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for Chronic Primary Low Back Pain in Adults Verville, Leslie Hincapié, Cesar A. Southerst, Danielle Yu, Hainan Bussières, André Gross, Douglas P. Pereira, Paulo Mior, Silvano Tricco, Andrea C. Cedraschi, Christine Brunton, Ginny Nordin, Margareta Connell, Gaelan Shearer, Heather M. Wong, Jessica J. Hofstetter, Léonie Romanelli, Andrew Guist, Brett To, Daphne Stuber, Kent da Silva-Oolup, Sophia Stupar, Maja Myrtos, Danny Lee, Joyce G.B. DeSouza, Astrid Muñoz Laguna, Javier Murnaghan, Kent Cancelliere, Carol J Occup Rehabil Article PURPOSE: To evaluate benefits and harms of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for chronic primary low back pain (CPLBP) in adults to inform a World Health Organization (WHO) standard clinical guideline. METHODS: We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from various electronic databases from July 1, 2007 to March 9, 2022. Eligible RCTs targeted TENS compared to placebo/sham, usual care, no intervention, or interventions with isolated TENS effects (i.e., combined TENS with treatment B versus treatment B alone) in adults with CPLBP. We extracted outcomes requested by the WHO Guideline Development Group, appraised the risk of bias, conducted meta-analyses where appropriate, and graded the certainty of evidence using GRADE. RESULTS: Seventeen RCTs (adults, n = 1027; adults ≥ 60 years, n = 28) out of 2010 records and 89 full text RCTs screened were included. The evidence suggested that TENS resulted in a marginal reduction in pain compared to sham (9 RCTs) in the immediate term (2 weeks) (mean difference (MD) = -0.90, 95% confidence interval  -1.54 to -0.26), and a reduction in pain catastrophizing in the short term (3 months) with TENS versus no intervention or interventions with TENS specific effects (1 RCT) (MD = -11.20, 95% CI -17.88 to -3.52). For other outcomes, little or no difference was found between TENS and the comparison interventions. The certainty of the evidence for all outcomes was very low. CONCLUSIONS: Based on very low certainty evidence, TENS resulted in brief and marginal reductions in pain (not deemed clinically important) and a short-term reduction in pain catastrophizing in adults with CPLBP, while little to no differences were found for other outcomes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10926-023-10121-7. Springer US 2023-11-22 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10684422/ /pubmed/37991646 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10926-023-10121-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Verville, Leslie
Hincapié, Cesar A.
Southerst, Danielle
Yu, Hainan
Bussières, André
Gross, Douglas P.
Pereira, Paulo
Mior, Silvano
Tricco, Andrea C.
Cedraschi, Christine
Brunton, Ginny
Nordin, Margareta
Connell, Gaelan
Shearer, Heather M.
Wong, Jessica J.
Hofstetter, Léonie
Romanelli, Andrew
Guist, Brett
To, Daphne
Stuber, Kent
da Silva-Oolup, Sophia
Stupar, Maja
Myrtos, Danny
Lee, Joyce G.B.
DeSouza, Astrid
Muñoz Laguna, Javier
Murnaghan, Kent
Cancelliere, Carol
Systematic Review to Inform a World Health Organization (WHO) Clinical Practice Guideline: Benefits and Harms of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for Chronic Primary Low Back Pain in Adults
title Systematic Review to Inform a World Health Organization (WHO) Clinical Practice Guideline: Benefits and Harms of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for Chronic Primary Low Back Pain in Adults
title_full Systematic Review to Inform a World Health Organization (WHO) Clinical Practice Guideline: Benefits and Harms of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for Chronic Primary Low Back Pain in Adults
title_fullStr Systematic Review to Inform a World Health Organization (WHO) Clinical Practice Guideline: Benefits and Harms of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for Chronic Primary Low Back Pain in Adults
title_full_unstemmed Systematic Review to Inform a World Health Organization (WHO) Clinical Practice Guideline: Benefits and Harms of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for Chronic Primary Low Back Pain in Adults
title_short Systematic Review to Inform a World Health Organization (WHO) Clinical Practice Guideline: Benefits and Harms of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for Chronic Primary Low Back Pain in Adults
title_sort systematic review to inform a world health organization (who) clinical practice guideline: benefits and harms of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (tens) for chronic primary low back pain in adults
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10684422/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37991646
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10926-023-10121-7
work_keys_str_mv AT vervilleleslie systematicreviewtoinformaworldhealthorganizationwhoclinicalpracticeguidelinebenefitsandharmsoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationtensforchronicprimarylowbackpaininadults
AT hincapiecesara systematicreviewtoinformaworldhealthorganizationwhoclinicalpracticeguidelinebenefitsandharmsoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationtensforchronicprimarylowbackpaininadults
AT southerstdanielle systematicreviewtoinformaworldhealthorganizationwhoclinicalpracticeguidelinebenefitsandharmsoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationtensforchronicprimarylowbackpaininadults
AT yuhainan systematicreviewtoinformaworldhealthorganizationwhoclinicalpracticeguidelinebenefitsandharmsoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationtensforchronicprimarylowbackpaininadults
AT bussieresandre systematicreviewtoinformaworldhealthorganizationwhoclinicalpracticeguidelinebenefitsandharmsoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationtensforchronicprimarylowbackpaininadults
AT grossdouglasp systematicreviewtoinformaworldhealthorganizationwhoclinicalpracticeguidelinebenefitsandharmsoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationtensforchronicprimarylowbackpaininadults
AT pereirapaulo systematicreviewtoinformaworldhealthorganizationwhoclinicalpracticeguidelinebenefitsandharmsoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationtensforchronicprimarylowbackpaininadults
AT miorsilvano systematicreviewtoinformaworldhealthorganizationwhoclinicalpracticeguidelinebenefitsandharmsoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationtensforchronicprimarylowbackpaininadults
AT triccoandreac systematicreviewtoinformaworldhealthorganizationwhoclinicalpracticeguidelinebenefitsandharmsoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationtensforchronicprimarylowbackpaininadults
AT cedraschichristine systematicreviewtoinformaworldhealthorganizationwhoclinicalpracticeguidelinebenefitsandharmsoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationtensforchronicprimarylowbackpaininadults
AT bruntonginny systematicreviewtoinformaworldhealthorganizationwhoclinicalpracticeguidelinebenefitsandharmsoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationtensforchronicprimarylowbackpaininadults
AT nordinmargareta systematicreviewtoinformaworldhealthorganizationwhoclinicalpracticeguidelinebenefitsandharmsoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationtensforchronicprimarylowbackpaininadults
AT connellgaelan systematicreviewtoinformaworldhealthorganizationwhoclinicalpracticeguidelinebenefitsandharmsoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationtensforchronicprimarylowbackpaininadults
AT shearerheatherm systematicreviewtoinformaworldhealthorganizationwhoclinicalpracticeguidelinebenefitsandharmsoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationtensforchronicprimarylowbackpaininadults
AT wongjessicaj systematicreviewtoinformaworldhealthorganizationwhoclinicalpracticeguidelinebenefitsandharmsoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationtensforchronicprimarylowbackpaininadults
AT hofstetterleonie systematicreviewtoinformaworldhealthorganizationwhoclinicalpracticeguidelinebenefitsandharmsoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationtensforchronicprimarylowbackpaininadults
AT romanelliandrew systematicreviewtoinformaworldhealthorganizationwhoclinicalpracticeguidelinebenefitsandharmsoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationtensforchronicprimarylowbackpaininadults
AT guistbrett systematicreviewtoinformaworldhealthorganizationwhoclinicalpracticeguidelinebenefitsandharmsoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationtensforchronicprimarylowbackpaininadults
AT todaphne systematicreviewtoinformaworldhealthorganizationwhoclinicalpracticeguidelinebenefitsandharmsoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationtensforchronicprimarylowbackpaininadults
AT stuberkent systematicreviewtoinformaworldhealthorganizationwhoclinicalpracticeguidelinebenefitsandharmsoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationtensforchronicprimarylowbackpaininadults
AT dasilvaoolupsophia systematicreviewtoinformaworldhealthorganizationwhoclinicalpracticeguidelinebenefitsandharmsoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationtensforchronicprimarylowbackpaininadults
AT stuparmaja systematicreviewtoinformaworldhealthorganizationwhoclinicalpracticeguidelinebenefitsandharmsoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationtensforchronicprimarylowbackpaininadults
AT myrtosdanny systematicreviewtoinformaworldhealthorganizationwhoclinicalpracticeguidelinebenefitsandharmsoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationtensforchronicprimarylowbackpaininadults
AT leejoycegb systematicreviewtoinformaworldhealthorganizationwhoclinicalpracticeguidelinebenefitsandharmsoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationtensforchronicprimarylowbackpaininadults
AT desouzaastrid systematicreviewtoinformaworldhealthorganizationwhoclinicalpracticeguidelinebenefitsandharmsoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationtensforchronicprimarylowbackpaininadults
AT munozlagunajavier systematicreviewtoinformaworldhealthorganizationwhoclinicalpracticeguidelinebenefitsandharmsoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationtensforchronicprimarylowbackpaininadults
AT murnaghankent systematicreviewtoinformaworldhealthorganizationwhoclinicalpracticeguidelinebenefitsandharmsoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationtensforchronicprimarylowbackpaininadults
AT cancellierecarol systematicreviewtoinformaworldhealthorganizationwhoclinicalpracticeguidelinebenefitsandharmsoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationtensforchronicprimarylowbackpaininadults