Cargando…
Comparison of hydraulic, pneumatic and electric linear actuation systems
Different applications or industries use different systems for linear actuation, such as hydraulic, pneumatic or electric. Electric systems are becoming increasingly popular and are already replacing hydraulic systems in various applications. These are known to be potentially harmful to the environm...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10684514/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38016978 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-47602-x |
_version_ | 1785151416985190400 |
---|---|
author | Pustavrh, Jan Hočevar, Marko Podržaj, Primož Trajkovski, Ana Majdič, Franc |
author_facet | Pustavrh, Jan Hočevar, Marko Podržaj, Primož Trajkovski, Ana Majdič, Franc |
author_sort | Pustavrh, Jan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Different applications or industries use different systems for linear actuation, such as hydraulic, pneumatic or electric. Electric systems are becoming increasingly popular and are already replacing hydraulic systems in various applications. These are known to be potentially harmful to the environment, as large amounts of fluid can be released into the environment in the event of a pipe burst or other accident. This paper presents the results of a comparison between hydraulic, pneumatic and electric systems under variable conditions but with similar loads in all three systems. The common feature of all three systems is the input power, which was limited to 1.1 kW. There was no hydraulic accumulator in the hydraulic system and no pressure vessel in the pneumatic system, so no stored energy could influence the system behaviour or results. The main difference between the systems studied was the profile of displacement and power consumption. The most consistent response and lowest power consumption were obtained with the electric system, although both hydraulic and pneumatic systems can achieve consistent response with some modifications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10684514 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106845142023-11-30 Comparison of hydraulic, pneumatic and electric linear actuation systems Pustavrh, Jan Hočevar, Marko Podržaj, Primož Trajkovski, Ana Majdič, Franc Sci Rep Article Different applications or industries use different systems for linear actuation, such as hydraulic, pneumatic or electric. Electric systems are becoming increasingly popular and are already replacing hydraulic systems in various applications. These are known to be potentially harmful to the environment, as large amounts of fluid can be released into the environment in the event of a pipe burst or other accident. This paper presents the results of a comparison between hydraulic, pneumatic and electric systems under variable conditions but with similar loads in all three systems. The common feature of all three systems is the input power, which was limited to 1.1 kW. There was no hydraulic accumulator in the hydraulic system and no pressure vessel in the pneumatic system, so no stored energy could influence the system behaviour or results. The main difference between the systems studied was the profile of displacement and power consumption. The most consistent response and lowest power consumption were obtained with the electric system, although both hydraulic and pneumatic systems can achieve consistent response with some modifications. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10684514/ /pubmed/38016978 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-47602-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Pustavrh, Jan Hočevar, Marko Podržaj, Primož Trajkovski, Ana Majdič, Franc Comparison of hydraulic, pneumatic and electric linear actuation systems |
title | Comparison of hydraulic, pneumatic and electric linear actuation systems |
title_full | Comparison of hydraulic, pneumatic and electric linear actuation systems |
title_fullStr | Comparison of hydraulic, pneumatic and electric linear actuation systems |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of hydraulic, pneumatic and electric linear actuation systems |
title_short | Comparison of hydraulic, pneumatic and electric linear actuation systems |
title_sort | comparison of hydraulic, pneumatic and electric linear actuation systems |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10684514/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38016978 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-47602-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pustavrhjan comparisonofhydraulicpneumaticandelectriclinearactuationsystems AT hocevarmarko comparisonofhydraulicpneumaticandelectriclinearactuationsystems AT podrzajprimoz comparisonofhydraulicpneumaticandelectriclinearactuationsystems AT trajkovskiana comparisonofhydraulicpneumaticandelectriclinearactuationsystems AT majdicfranc comparisonofhydraulicpneumaticandelectriclinearactuationsystems |