Cargando…

Residual Work Capacity and (In)Ability to Work Fulltime Among a Year-Cohort of Disability Benefit Applicants Diagnosed with Mental and Behavioural Disorders

AIMS: Residual work capacity and inability to work fulltime are important outcomes in disability benefit assessment for workers with mental and behavioural disorders. The aim of this study is to gain insight into the prevalence and associations of socio-demographic and disease-related factors of the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hoekstra, Tialda, Boersema, Henk-Jan, Abma, Femke I., Brouwer, Sandra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10684610/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36899152
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10926-023-10109-3
_version_ 1785151441003872256
author Hoekstra, Tialda
Boersema, Henk-Jan
Abma, Femke I.
Brouwer, Sandra
author_facet Hoekstra, Tialda
Boersema, Henk-Jan
Abma, Femke I.
Brouwer, Sandra
author_sort Hoekstra, Tialda
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Residual work capacity and inability to work fulltime are important outcomes in disability benefit assessment for workers with mental and behavioural disorders. The aim of this study is to gain insight into the prevalence and associations of socio-demographic and disease-related factors of these outcomes across different mental and behavioural diagnoses groups. METHODS: A year cohort of anonymized register-data of patients diagnosed with a mental or behavioural disorder who claim a work disability benefit after two years of sick-leave was used (n = 12,325, age 44.5 ± 10.9, 55.5% female). Limitations in mental and physical functioning caused by disease are indicated according to the Functional Ability List (FAL). No residual work capacity was defined as having no possibilities to work, whereas inability to work fulltime was defined as being able to work less than 8 h per day. RESULTS: The majority (77.5%) of the applicants were assessed with residual work capacity, of these 58.6% had an ability to work fulltime. Applicants diagnosed with (post-traumatic) stress, mood affective and delusional disorders showed significant higher odds for no residual work capacity and for inability to work fulltime, while other diagnoses groups, like adjustment and anxiety disorders, showed decreased odds for both assessment outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The type of mental and behavioural disorder seems important in the assessment of residual work capacity and inability to work fulltime, as the associations differ significantly between the specific diagnoses groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10684610
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106846102023-11-30 Residual Work Capacity and (In)Ability to Work Fulltime Among a Year-Cohort of Disability Benefit Applicants Diagnosed with Mental and Behavioural Disorders Hoekstra, Tialda Boersema, Henk-Jan Abma, Femke I. Brouwer, Sandra J Occup Rehabil Article AIMS: Residual work capacity and inability to work fulltime are important outcomes in disability benefit assessment for workers with mental and behavioural disorders. The aim of this study is to gain insight into the prevalence and associations of socio-demographic and disease-related factors of these outcomes across different mental and behavioural diagnoses groups. METHODS: A year cohort of anonymized register-data of patients diagnosed with a mental or behavioural disorder who claim a work disability benefit after two years of sick-leave was used (n = 12,325, age 44.5 ± 10.9, 55.5% female). Limitations in mental and physical functioning caused by disease are indicated according to the Functional Ability List (FAL). No residual work capacity was defined as having no possibilities to work, whereas inability to work fulltime was defined as being able to work less than 8 h per day. RESULTS: The majority (77.5%) of the applicants were assessed with residual work capacity, of these 58.6% had an ability to work fulltime. Applicants diagnosed with (post-traumatic) stress, mood affective and delusional disorders showed significant higher odds for no residual work capacity and for inability to work fulltime, while other diagnoses groups, like adjustment and anxiety disorders, showed decreased odds for both assessment outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The type of mental and behavioural disorder seems important in the assessment of residual work capacity and inability to work fulltime, as the associations differ significantly between the specific diagnoses groups. Springer US 2023-03-11 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10684610/ /pubmed/36899152 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10926-023-10109-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Hoekstra, Tialda
Boersema, Henk-Jan
Abma, Femke I.
Brouwer, Sandra
Residual Work Capacity and (In)Ability to Work Fulltime Among a Year-Cohort of Disability Benefit Applicants Diagnosed with Mental and Behavioural Disorders
title Residual Work Capacity and (In)Ability to Work Fulltime Among a Year-Cohort of Disability Benefit Applicants Diagnosed with Mental and Behavioural Disorders
title_full Residual Work Capacity and (In)Ability to Work Fulltime Among a Year-Cohort of Disability Benefit Applicants Diagnosed with Mental and Behavioural Disorders
title_fullStr Residual Work Capacity and (In)Ability to Work Fulltime Among a Year-Cohort of Disability Benefit Applicants Diagnosed with Mental and Behavioural Disorders
title_full_unstemmed Residual Work Capacity and (In)Ability to Work Fulltime Among a Year-Cohort of Disability Benefit Applicants Diagnosed with Mental and Behavioural Disorders
title_short Residual Work Capacity and (In)Ability to Work Fulltime Among a Year-Cohort of Disability Benefit Applicants Diagnosed with Mental and Behavioural Disorders
title_sort residual work capacity and (in)ability to work fulltime among a year-cohort of disability benefit applicants diagnosed with mental and behavioural disorders
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10684610/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36899152
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10926-023-10109-3
work_keys_str_mv AT hoekstratialda residualworkcapacityandinabilitytoworkfulltimeamongayearcohortofdisabilitybenefitapplicantsdiagnosedwithmentalandbehaviouraldisorders
AT boersemahenkjan residualworkcapacityandinabilitytoworkfulltimeamongayearcohortofdisabilitybenefitapplicantsdiagnosedwithmentalandbehaviouraldisorders
AT abmafemkei residualworkcapacityandinabilitytoworkfulltimeamongayearcohortofdisabilitybenefitapplicantsdiagnosedwithmentalandbehaviouraldisorders
AT brouwersandra residualworkcapacityandinabilitytoworkfulltimeamongayearcohortofdisabilitybenefitapplicantsdiagnosedwithmentalandbehaviouraldisorders