Cargando…

Effects of poling camber angle on the biomechanics of cross-country sit-skiing

Cross-country sit-skiers use double poling (DP) technique to drive the slide. The aim of this study is to analyze how poling camber angle affect the capacity of power output and biomechanical parameters of the DP process. Twenty-four non-disabled college students (24.67 ± 1.46 years old) were recrui...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tian, Yuan, Chen, Xue, Liu, Yujie, Sun, Gang, Zhou, Zhixiong, Liu, Chenglin, Huo, Bo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10684654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38017144
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-48359-z
_version_ 1785151451622801408
author Tian, Yuan
Chen, Xue
Liu, Yujie
Sun, Gang
Zhou, Zhixiong
Liu, Chenglin
Huo, Bo
author_facet Tian, Yuan
Chen, Xue
Liu, Yujie
Sun, Gang
Zhou, Zhixiong
Liu, Chenglin
Huo, Bo
author_sort Tian, Yuan
collection PubMed
description Cross-country sit-skiers use double poling (DP) technique to drive the slide. The aim of this study is to analyze how poling camber angle affect the capacity of power output and biomechanical parameters of the DP process. Twenty-four non-disabled college students (24.67 ± 1.46 years old) were recruited to perform three successive 30-s maximal effort tests with different poling camber angles of 0°, 15°, 24° and 30° using a sit-skiing ergometer. The biomechanical parameters, output power and muscle activation of the subjects were analyzed. The results showed that DP output power increased with the increase of poling camber angle at 15° (597.78 ± 150.31 J), 24° (610.94 ± 158.96 J, P = 0.011) and 30° (629.10 ± 168.78 J, P < 0.001) compared with 0° (590.65 ± 148.95 J). However, effective output power decreased with the increase of camber angle. Poling with camber angle of 24° had the shortest cycle time 1.53 ± 0.17 s, compared with other abduction angle (0°, 1.57 ± 0.19 s, 15°, 1.55 ± 0.16 s, and 30°, 1.56 ± 0.19 s). Compared with 0° (1.02 ± 0.14 m), the cycle distance significantly increased at poling camber angles of 24° (1.07 ± 0.12 m, P = 0.029) and 30° (1.11 ± 0.13 m, P < 0.001). With the increase of poling camber angle, the shoulder and elbow joint range of motions and joint moments were significantly increased. This study found that poling with shoulder abducted increased the output power but decreased the efficiency. By analyzing the poling angle and poling force, we find that the optimal poling camber angle may depend on the terrain or the skiing speed. These results may guide the competition techniques and tactics in the matches, and may further influence the strength-training programs of cross-country sit-skiing athletes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10684654
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106846542023-11-30 Effects of poling camber angle on the biomechanics of cross-country sit-skiing Tian, Yuan Chen, Xue Liu, Yujie Sun, Gang Zhou, Zhixiong Liu, Chenglin Huo, Bo Sci Rep Article Cross-country sit-skiers use double poling (DP) technique to drive the slide. The aim of this study is to analyze how poling camber angle affect the capacity of power output and biomechanical parameters of the DP process. Twenty-four non-disabled college students (24.67 ± 1.46 years old) were recruited to perform three successive 30-s maximal effort tests with different poling camber angles of 0°, 15°, 24° and 30° using a sit-skiing ergometer. The biomechanical parameters, output power and muscle activation of the subjects were analyzed. The results showed that DP output power increased with the increase of poling camber angle at 15° (597.78 ± 150.31 J), 24° (610.94 ± 158.96 J, P = 0.011) and 30° (629.10 ± 168.78 J, P < 0.001) compared with 0° (590.65 ± 148.95 J). However, effective output power decreased with the increase of camber angle. Poling with camber angle of 24° had the shortest cycle time 1.53 ± 0.17 s, compared with other abduction angle (0°, 1.57 ± 0.19 s, 15°, 1.55 ± 0.16 s, and 30°, 1.56 ± 0.19 s). Compared with 0° (1.02 ± 0.14 m), the cycle distance significantly increased at poling camber angles of 24° (1.07 ± 0.12 m, P = 0.029) and 30° (1.11 ± 0.13 m, P < 0.001). With the increase of poling camber angle, the shoulder and elbow joint range of motions and joint moments were significantly increased. This study found that poling with shoulder abducted increased the output power but decreased the efficiency. By analyzing the poling angle and poling force, we find that the optimal poling camber angle may depend on the terrain or the skiing speed. These results may guide the competition techniques and tactics in the matches, and may further influence the strength-training programs of cross-country sit-skiing athletes. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10684654/ /pubmed/38017144 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-48359-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Tian, Yuan
Chen, Xue
Liu, Yujie
Sun, Gang
Zhou, Zhixiong
Liu, Chenglin
Huo, Bo
Effects of poling camber angle on the biomechanics of cross-country sit-skiing
title Effects of poling camber angle on the biomechanics of cross-country sit-skiing
title_full Effects of poling camber angle on the biomechanics of cross-country sit-skiing
title_fullStr Effects of poling camber angle on the biomechanics of cross-country sit-skiing
title_full_unstemmed Effects of poling camber angle on the biomechanics of cross-country sit-skiing
title_short Effects of poling camber angle on the biomechanics of cross-country sit-skiing
title_sort effects of poling camber angle on the biomechanics of cross-country sit-skiing
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10684654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38017144
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-48359-z
work_keys_str_mv AT tianyuan effectsofpolingcamberangleonthebiomechanicsofcrosscountrysitskiing
AT chenxue effectsofpolingcamberangleonthebiomechanicsofcrosscountrysitskiing
AT liuyujie effectsofpolingcamberangleonthebiomechanicsofcrosscountrysitskiing
AT sungang effectsofpolingcamberangleonthebiomechanicsofcrosscountrysitskiing
AT zhouzhixiong effectsofpolingcamberangleonthebiomechanicsofcrosscountrysitskiing
AT liuchenglin effectsofpolingcamberangleonthebiomechanicsofcrosscountrysitskiing
AT huobo effectsofpolingcamberangleonthebiomechanicsofcrosscountrysitskiing