Cargando…

Evaluation of the interhospital patient transfer after implementation of a regionalized trauma care system (TraumaNetzwerk DGU(®)) in Germany

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to evaluate how many patients are being transferred between trauma centers and and their characteristics in the 2006 initiated TraumaNetzwerk DGU(®) (TNW). We further investigated the time point of transfer and differences in outcome, compared to patients not being...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Spering, C., Bieler, D., Ruchholtz, S., Bouillon, B., Hartensuer, R., Lehmann, W., Lefering, R., Düsing, H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10684689/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38034545
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1298562
_version_ 1785151460076421120
author Spering, C.
Bieler, D.
Ruchholtz, S.
Bouillon, B.
Hartensuer, R.
Lehmann, W.
Lefering, R.
Düsing, H.
author_facet Spering, C.
Bieler, D.
Ruchholtz, S.
Bouillon, B.
Hartensuer, R.
Lehmann, W.
Lefering, R.
Düsing, H.
author_sort Spering, C.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to evaluate how many patients are being transferred between trauma centers and and their characteristics in the 2006 initiated TraumaNetzwerk DGU(®) (TNW). We further investigated the time point of transfer and differences in outcome, compared to patients not being transferred. We wanted to know how trauma centers judged the performance of the TNW in transfer. METHOD: (1) We analyzed the data of the TraumaRegister DGU(®) (TR-DGU) from 2014–2018. Included were patients that were treated in German trauma centers, maximum AIS (MAIS) >2 and MAIS 2 only in case of admission on ICU or death of the patient. Patients being transferred were compared to patients who were not. Characteristics were compared, and a logistic regression analysis performed to identify predictive factors. (2) We performed a survey in the TNW focussing on frequency, timing and communication between hospitals and improvement through TNW. RESULTS: Study I analyzed 143,195 patients from the TR-DGU. Their mean ISS was 17.8 points (SD 11.5). 56.4% were admitted primarily to a Level-I, 32.2% to a Level-II and 11.4% to a Level-III Trauma Center. 10,450 patients (7.9%) were transferred. 3,667 patients (22.7%) of the admitted patients of Level-III Center and 5,610 (12.6%) of Level-II Center were transferred, these patients showed a higher ISS (Level-III: 18.1 vs. 12.9; Level-II: 20.1 vs. 15.8) with more often a severe brain injury (AIS 3+) (Level-III: 43.6% vs. 13.1%; Level-II: 53.2% vs. 23.8%). Regression analysis showed ISS 25+ and severe brain injury AIS 3+ are predictive factors for patients needing a rapid transfer. Study II: 215 complete questionnaires (34%) of the 632 trauma centers. Transfers were executed within 2 h after the accident (Level-III: 55.3%; Level-II: 25.0%) and between 2–6 h (Level-III: 39.5%; Level-II: 51.3%). Most trauma centers judged that implementation of TNW improved trauma care significantly (Level III: 65.0%; Level-II: 61.4%, Level-I: 56.7%). CONCLUSION: The implementation of TNW has improved the communication and quality of comprehensive trauma care of severely injured patients within Germany. Transfer is mostly organized efficient. Predictors such as higher level of head injury reveal that preclinical algorithm present a potential of further improvement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10684689
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106846892023-11-30 Evaluation of the interhospital patient transfer after implementation of a regionalized trauma care system (TraumaNetzwerk DGU(®)) in Germany Spering, C. Bieler, D. Ruchholtz, S. Bouillon, B. Hartensuer, R. Lehmann, W. Lefering, R. Düsing, H. Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to evaluate how many patients are being transferred between trauma centers and and their characteristics in the 2006 initiated TraumaNetzwerk DGU(®) (TNW). We further investigated the time point of transfer and differences in outcome, compared to patients not being transferred. We wanted to know how trauma centers judged the performance of the TNW in transfer. METHOD: (1) We analyzed the data of the TraumaRegister DGU(®) (TR-DGU) from 2014–2018. Included were patients that were treated in German trauma centers, maximum AIS (MAIS) >2 and MAIS 2 only in case of admission on ICU or death of the patient. Patients being transferred were compared to patients who were not. Characteristics were compared, and a logistic regression analysis performed to identify predictive factors. (2) We performed a survey in the TNW focussing on frequency, timing and communication between hospitals and improvement through TNW. RESULTS: Study I analyzed 143,195 patients from the TR-DGU. Their mean ISS was 17.8 points (SD 11.5). 56.4% were admitted primarily to a Level-I, 32.2% to a Level-II and 11.4% to a Level-III Trauma Center. 10,450 patients (7.9%) were transferred. 3,667 patients (22.7%) of the admitted patients of Level-III Center and 5,610 (12.6%) of Level-II Center were transferred, these patients showed a higher ISS (Level-III: 18.1 vs. 12.9; Level-II: 20.1 vs. 15.8) with more often a severe brain injury (AIS 3+) (Level-III: 43.6% vs. 13.1%; Level-II: 53.2% vs. 23.8%). Regression analysis showed ISS 25+ and severe brain injury AIS 3+ are predictive factors for patients needing a rapid transfer. Study II: 215 complete questionnaires (34%) of the 632 trauma centers. Transfers were executed within 2 h after the accident (Level-III: 55.3%; Level-II: 25.0%) and between 2–6 h (Level-III: 39.5%; Level-II: 51.3%). Most trauma centers judged that implementation of TNW improved trauma care significantly (Level III: 65.0%; Level-II: 61.4%, Level-I: 56.7%). CONCLUSION: The implementation of TNW has improved the communication and quality of comprehensive trauma care of severely injured patients within Germany. Transfer is mostly organized efficient. Predictors such as higher level of head injury reveal that preclinical algorithm present a potential of further improvement. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10684689/ /pubmed/38034545 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1298562 Text en Copyright © 2023 Spering, Bieler, Ruchholtz, Bouillon, Hartensuer, Lehmann, Lefering and Düsing. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Spering, C.
Bieler, D.
Ruchholtz, S.
Bouillon, B.
Hartensuer, R.
Lehmann, W.
Lefering, R.
Düsing, H.
Evaluation of the interhospital patient transfer after implementation of a regionalized trauma care system (TraumaNetzwerk DGU(®)) in Germany
title Evaluation of the interhospital patient transfer after implementation of a regionalized trauma care system (TraumaNetzwerk DGU(®)) in Germany
title_full Evaluation of the interhospital patient transfer after implementation of a regionalized trauma care system (TraumaNetzwerk DGU(®)) in Germany
title_fullStr Evaluation of the interhospital patient transfer after implementation of a regionalized trauma care system (TraumaNetzwerk DGU(®)) in Germany
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the interhospital patient transfer after implementation of a regionalized trauma care system (TraumaNetzwerk DGU(®)) in Germany
title_short Evaluation of the interhospital patient transfer after implementation of a regionalized trauma care system (TraumaNetzwerk DGU(®)) in Germany
title_sort evaluation of the interhospital patient transfer after implementation of a regionalized trauma care system (traumanetzwerk dgu(®)) in germany
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10684689/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38034545
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1298562
work_keys_str_mv AT speringc evaluationoftheinterhospitalpatienttransferafterimplementationofaregionalizedtraumacaresystemtraumanetzwerkdguingermany
AT bielerd evaluationoftheinterhospitalpatienttransferafterimplementationofaregionalizedtraumacaresystemtraumanetzwerkdguingermany
AT ruchholtzs evaluationoftheinterhospitalpatienttransferafterimplementationofaregionalizedtraumacaresystemtraumanetzwerkdguingermany
AT bouillonb evaluationoftheinterhospitalpatienttransferafterimplementationofaregionalizedtraumacaresystemtraumanetzwerkdguingermany
AT hartensuerr evaluationoftheinterhospitalpatienttransferafterimplementationofaregionalizedtraumacaresystemtraumanetzwerkdguingermany
AT lehmannw evaluationoftheinterhospitalpatienttransferafterimplementationofaregionalizedtraumacaresystemtraumanetzwerkdguingermany
AT leferingr evaluationoftheinterhospitalpatienttransferafterimplementationofaregionalizedtraumacaresystemtraumanetzwerkdguingermany
AT dusingh evaluationoftheinterhospitalpatienttransferafterimplementationofaregionalizedtraumacaresystemtraumanetzwerkdguingermany
AT evaluationoftheinterhospitalpatienttransferafterimplementationofaregionalizedtraumacaresystemtraumanetzwerkdguingermany