Cargando…
Efficacy and safety of anisodine hydrobromide injection for acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Background: Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anisodine hydrobromide (Ani) injection in the treatment of AIS. Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) based on Ani injection for the treatment...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10684921/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38034985 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2023.1290755 |
_version_ | 1785151513683820544 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Yang Wan, Feng Hu, Peiqun He, Benxiang Hu, Yushi Liu, Yunlu |
author_facet | Wang, Yang Wan, Feng Hu, Peiqun He, Benxiang Hu, Yushi Liu, Yunlu |
author_sort | Wang, Yang |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anisodine hydrobromide (Ani) injection in the treatment of AIS. Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) based on Ani injection for the treatment of AIS were retrieved from both Chinese and English databases. The retrieval period was from the databases’ inception to May 2023. The Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool was used to assess the methodological quality. The outcome indicators were analyzed using RevMan 5.3 software. Results: We included the findings of 11 RCTs encompassing 1,337 patients with AIS. Our meta-analysis revealed that Ani injection supplementation significantly reduced the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [MD = −1.53, 95%CI = (−1.94, −1.12), p < 0.00001], modified Rankin Scale [MD = −0.89, 95%CI = (−0.97, −0.81), p < 0.00001], and the relative time to peak [SMD = −0.81, 95%CI = (−1.08, −0.55), p < 0.00001] significantly. Additionally, Ani injection significantly increased the Barthel Index [MD = 10.65, 95%CI = (4.30, 17.00), p = 0.001], relative cerebral blood volume [SMD = 0.28, 95%CI = (0.02, 0.53), p = 0.03], and clinical efficacy [RR = 1.2, 95%CI = (1.08, 1.34), p = 0.001]. No statistically significant difference in the rate of adverse events was observed between the Ani injection supplemental group and the control group. Conclusion: Based on currently published evidence, Ani injection was found to be effective and safe in improving AIS outcome. Nevertheless, limitations of the included RCTs still exist, and thus, more multi-center, large-sample, high-quality RCTs are required to further verify the efficacy and safety of Ani injection in patients with AIS. Systematic Review Registration: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023427591], identifier [PROSPERO 2023 CRD42023427591]. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10684921 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106849212023-11-30 Efficacy and safety of anisodine hydrobromide injection for acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis Wang, Yang Wan, Feng Hu, Peiqun He, Benxiang Hu, Yushi Liu, Yunlu Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Background: Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anisodine hydrobromide (Ani) injection in the treatment of AIS. Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) based on Ani injection for the treatment of AIS were retrieved from both Chinese and English databases. The retrieval period was from the databases’ inception to May 2023. The Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool was used to assess the methodological quality. The outcome indicators were analyzed using RevMan 5.3 software. Results: We included the findings of 11 RCTs encompassing 1,337 patients with AIS. Our meta-analysis revealed that Ani injection supplementation significantly reduced the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [MD = −1.53, 95%CI = (−1.94, −1.12), p < 0.00001], modified Rankin Scale [MD = −0.89, 95%CI = (−0.97, −0.81), p < 0.00001], and the relative time to peak [SMD = −0.81, 95%CI = (−1.08, −0.55), p < 0.00001] significantly. Additionally, Ani injection significantly increased the Barthel Index [MD = 10.65, 95%CI = (4.30, 17.00), p = 0.001], relative cerebral blood volume [SMD = 0.28, 95%CI = (0.02, 0.53), p = 0.03], and clinical efficacy [RR = 1.2, 95%CI = (1.08, 1.34), p = 0.001]. No statistically significant difference in the rate of adverse events was observed between the Ani injection supplemental group and the control group. Conclusion: Based on currently published evidence, Ani injection was found to be effective and safe in improving AIS outcome. Nevertheless, limitations of the included RCTs still exist, and thus, more multi-center, large-sample, high-quality RCTs are required to further verify the efficacy and safety of Ani injection in patients with AIS. Systematic Review Registration: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023427591], identifier [PROSPERO 2023 CRD42023427591]. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10684921/ /pubmed/38034985 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2023.1290755 Text en Copyright © 2023 Wang, Wan, Hu, He, Hu and Liu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Pharmacology Wang, Yang Wan, Feng Hu, Peiqun He, Benxiang Hu, Yushi Liu, Yunlu Efficacy and safety of anisodine hydrobromide injection for acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Efficacy and safety of anisodine hydrobromide injection for acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Efficacy and safety of anisodine hydrobromide injection for acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and safety of anisodine hydrobromide injection for acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and safety of anisodine hydrobromide injection for acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Efficacy and safety of anisodine hydrobromide injection for acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of anisodine hydrobromide injection for acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Pharmacology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10684921/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38034985 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2023.1290755 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangyang efficacyandsafetyofanisodinehydrobromideinjectionforacuteischemicstrokeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wanfeng efficacyandsafetyofanisodinehydrobromideinjectionforacuteischemicstrokeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hupeiqun efficacyandsafetyofanisodinehydrobromideinjectionforacuteischemicstrokeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hebenxiang efficacyandsafetyofanisodinehydrobromideinjectionforacuteischemicstrokeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT huyushi efficacyandsafetyofanisodinehydrobromideinjectionforacuteischemicstrokeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liuyunlu efficacyandsafetyofanisodinehydrobromideinjectionforacuteischemicstrokeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |