Cargando…
Efficacy and safety of compassionate use for rare diseases: a scoping review from 1991 to 2022
BACKGROUND: Compassionate use is a system that provides patients with expedited access to drugs which has not yet been approved, but currently in clinical trials. The investigational drugs have been authorized for compassionate use in cases involving patients suffered from life-threatening diseases...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10685565/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38017575 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-023-02978-x |
_version_ | 1785151661425033216 |
---|---|
author | Wu, Jiayu Yang, Yang Yu, Jiaxin Qiao, Luyao Zuo, Wei Zhang, Bo |
author_facet | Wu, Jiayu Yang, Yang Yu, Jiaxin Qiao, Luyao Zuo, Wei Zhang, Bo |
author_sort | Wu, Jiayu |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Compassionate use is a system that provides patients with expedited access to drugs which has not yet been approved, but currently in clinical trials. The investigational drugs have been authorized for compassionate use in cases involving patients suffered from life-threatening diseases and with no alternative treatments. For instance, patients afflicted with highly heterogeneous rare diseases are eligible for treatment assistance through the compassionate use program. This study aims to investigate the characteristics of compassionate use in the context of rare diseases, evaluate the efficacy and safety of compassionate use for rare diseases, and analyze the marketing approval of investigational drugs. METHODS: The case reports/case series of compassionate use were collected by conducting searches on Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, CNKI and SinoMed, spanning from January 1991 to December 2022. Subsequently, two independent reviewers evaluated these reports. Case reports/case series that met the inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria were enrolled. Information extracted from these reports and series included patients' basic information, the investigational drug's name, its indication, adverse events, treatment outcomes, and other relevant data. RESULTS: A total of forty-six studies were included, encompassing 2079 patients with an average age of 38.1 years. Thirty-nine different drugs were involved in 46 studies. Furthermore, neoplasms emerged as the most common therapeutic area for compassionate use in rare disease management (23/46, 50.0%). Regarding the treatment efficacy, four studies reported successful disease resolution, while 35 studies observed symptom improvement among patients. Conversely, four studies documented no significant effects on patients' diseases. Moreover, one study reported worsened results following compassionate use, while the efficacy was not described in 2 studies. Adverse events were reported in 31 studies (67.4%) because of the compassionate use, while no adverse events occurred in 13 studies (28.3%). In other 2 studies, there was no description about whether treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were happened. 136 patients (6.5%) had Grade 5 adverse events (death), of which 19 deaths (0.9%) were considered to be related to compassionate use. Furthermore, the investigational drugs in 33 studies (33/46, 71.7%) received new drug approval at the end of January 31, 2023.The time lag from the start of the compassionate use to the formal approval of the investigational drug was 790.5 (IQR 359–2199.3) days. We found that in 11 studies, encompassing 9 different drugs, some compassionate use indications had not received regulatory authorities at the end of January 31, 2023. CONCLUSION: The current status of compassionate use for rare diseases was clarified systematically in this study. Compassionate use of investigational drug is a significant treatment option for rare disease. In general, compassionate use appears to demonstrate favorable efficacy in the context of rare diseases, with a significant proportion of compassionate use drugs subsequently receiving marketing approval. However, the safety of drugs for compassionate use cannot be fully evaluated due to the safety data were not covered in some enrolled studies. Therefore, the establishment of an adverse event reporting system specific to compassionate use is warranted. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13023-023-02978-x. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10685565 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106855652023-11-30 Efficacy and safety of compassionate use for rare diseases: a scoping review from 1991 to 2022 Wu, Jiayu Yang, Yang Yu, Jiaxin Qiao, Luyao Zuo, Wei Zhang, Bo Orphanet J Rare Dis Review BACKGROUND: Compassionate use is a system that provides patients with expedited access to drugs which has not yet been approved, but currently in clinical trials. The investigational drugs have been authorized for compassionate use in cases involving patients suffered from life-threatening diseases and with no alternative treatments. For instance, patients afflicted with highly heterogeneous rare diseases are eligible for treatment assistance through the compassionate use program. This study aims to investigate the characteristics of compassionate use in the context of rare diseases, evaluate the efficacy and safety of compassionate use for rare diseases, and analyze the marketing approval of investigational drugs. METHODS: The case reports/case series of compassionate use were collected by conducting searches on Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, CNKI and SinoMed, spanning from January 1991 to December 2022. Subsequently, two independent reviewers evaluated these reports. Case reports/case series that met the inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria were enrolled. Information extracted from these reports and series included patients' basic information, the investigational drug's name, its indication, adverse events, treatment outcomes, and other relevant data. RESULTS: A total of forty-six studies were included, encompassing 2079 patients with an average age of 38.1 years. Thirty-nine different drugs were involved in 46 studies. Furthermore, neoplasms emerged as the most common therapeutic area for compassionate use in rare disease management (23/46, 50.0%). Regarding the treatment efficacy, four studies reported successful disease resolution, while 35 studies observed symptom improvement among patients. Conversely, four studies documented no significant effects on patients' diseases. Moreover, one study reported worsened results following compassionate use, while the efficacy was not described in 2 studies. Adverse events were reported in 31 studies (67.4%) because of the compassionate use, while no adverse events occurred in 13 studies (28.3%). In other 2 studies, there was no description about whether treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were happened. 136 patients (6.5%) had Grade 5 adverse events (death), of which 19 deaths (0.9%) were considered to be related to compassionate use. Furthermore, the investigational drugs in 33 studies (33/46, 71.7%) received new drug approval at the end of January 31, 2023.The time lag from the start of the compassionate use to the formal approval of the investigational drug was 790.5 (IQR 359–2199.3) days. We found that in 11 studies, encompassing 9 different drugs, some compassionate use indications had not received regulatory authorities at the end of January 31, 2023. CONCLUSION: The current status of compassionate use for rare diseases was clarified systematically in this study. Compassionate use of investigational drug is a significant treatment option for rare disease. In general, compassionate use appears to demonstrate favorable efficacy in the context of rare diseases, with a significant proportion of compassionate use drugs subsequently receiving marketing approval. However, the safety of drugs for compassionate use cannot be fully evaluated due to the safety data were not covered in some enrolled studies. Therefore, the establishment of an adverse event reporting system specific to compassionate use is warranted. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13023-023-02978-x. BioMed Central 2023-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10685565/ /pubmed/38017575 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-023-02978-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Review Wu, Jiayu Yang, Yang Yu, Jiaxin Qiao, Luyao Zuo, Wei Zhang, Bo Efficacy and safety of compassionate use for rare diseases: a scoping review from 1991 to 2022 |
title | Efficacy and safety of compassionate use for rare diseases: a scoping review from 1991 to 2022 |
title_full | Efficacy and safety of compassionate use for rare diseases: a scoping review from 1991 to 2022 |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and safety of compassionate use for rare diseases: a scoping review from 1991 to 2022 |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and safety of compassionate use for rare diseases: a scoping review from 1991 to 2022 |
title_short | Efficacy and safety of compassionate use for rare diseases: a scoping review from 1991 to 2022 |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of compassionate use for rare diseases: a scoping review from 1991 to 2022 |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10685565/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38017575 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-023-02978-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wujiayu efficacyandsafetyofcompassionateuseforrarediseasesascopingreviewfrom1991to2022 AT yangyang efficacyandsafetyofcompassionateuseforrarediseasesascopingreviewfrom1991to2022 AT yujiaxin efficacyandsafetyofcompassionateuseforrarediseasesascopingreviewfrom1991to2022 AT qiaoluyao efficacyandsafetyofcompassionateuseforrarediseasesascopingreviewfrom1991to2022 AT zuowei efficacyandsafetyofcompassionateuseforrarediseasesascopingreviewfrom1991to2022 AT zhangbo efficacyandsafetyofcompassionateuseforrarediseasesascopingreviewfrom1991to2022 |