Cargando…

Comparison of deep learning-based image segmentation methods for intravascular ultrasound on retrospective and large image cohort study

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the generalization performance of deep learning segmentation models on a large cohort intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) image dataset over the lumen and external elastic membrane (EEM), and to assess the consistency and accuracy of automated IVUS qu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dong, Liang, Lu, Wei, Lu, Xuzhou, Leng, Xiaochang, Xiang, Jianping, Li, Changling
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10685628/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38017463
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-023-01171-2
_version_ 1785151676312715264
author Dong, Liang
Lu, Wei
Lu, Xuzhou
Leng, Xiaochang
Xiang, Jianping
Li, Changling
author_facet Dong, Liang
Lu, Wei
Lu, Xuzhou
Leng, Xiaochang
Xiang, Jianping
Li, Changling
author_sort Dong, Liang
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the generalization performance of deep learning segmentation models on a large cohort intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) image dataset over the lumen and external elastic membrane (EEM), and to assess the consistency and accuracy of automated IVUS quantitative measurement parameters. METHODS: A total of 11,070 IVUS images from 113 patients and pullbacks were collected and annotated by cardiologists to train and test deep learning segmentation models. A comparison of five state of the art medical image segmentation models was performed by evaluating the segmentation of the lumen and EEM. Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), intersection over union (IoU) and Hausdorff distance (HD) were calculated for the overall and for subsets of different IVUS image categories. Further, the agreement between the IVUS quantitative measurement parameters calculated by automatic segmentation and those calculated by manual segmentation was evaluated. Finally, the segmentation performance of our model was also compared with previous studies. RESULTS: CENet achieved the best performance in DSC (0.958 for lumen, 0.921 for EEM) and IoU (0.975 for lumen, 0.951 for EEM) among all models, while Res-UNet was the best performer in HD (0.219 for lumen, 0.178 for EEM). The mean intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland–Altman plot demonstrated the extremely strong agreement (0.855, 95% CI 0.822–0.887) between model's automatic prediction and manual measurements. CONCLUSIONS: Deep learning models based on large cohort image datasets were capable of achieving state of the art (SOTA) results in lumen and EEM segmentation. It can be used for IVUS clinical evaluation and achieve excellent agreement with clinicians on quantitative parameter measurements.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10685628
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106856282023-11-30 Comparison of deep learning-based image segmentation methods for intravascular ultrasound on retrospective and large image cohort study Dong, Liang Lu, Wei Lu, Xuzhou Leng, Xiaochang Xiang, Jianping Li, Changling Biomed Eng Online Research OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the generalization performance of deep learning segmentation models on a large cohort intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) image dataset over the lumen and external elastic membrane (EEM), and to assess the consistency and accuracy of automated IVUS quantitative measurement parameters. METHODS: A total of 11,070 IVUS images from 113 patients and pullbacks were collected and annotated by cardiologists to train and test deep learning segmentation models. A comparison of five state of the art medical image segmentation models was performed by evaluating the segmentation of the lumen and EEM. Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), intersection over union (IoU) and Hausdorff distance (HD) were calculated for the overall and for subsets of different IVUS image categories. Further, the agreement between the IVUS quantitative measurement parameters calculated by automatic segmentation and those calculated by manual segmentation was evaluated. Finally, the segmentation performance of our model was also compared with previous studies. RESULTS: CENet achieved the best performance in DSC (0.958 for lumen, 0.921 for EEM) and IoU (0.975 for lumen, 0.951 for EEM) among all models, while Res-UNet was the best performer in HD (0.219 for lumen, 0.178 for EEM). The mean intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland–Altman plot demonstrated the extremely strong agreement (0.855, 95% CI 0.822–0.887) between model's automatic prediction and manual measurements. CONCLUSIONS: Deep learning models based on large cohort image datasets were capable of achieving state of the art (SOTA) results in lumen and EEM segmentation. It can be used for IVUS clinical evaluation and achieve excellent agreement with clinicians on quantitative parameter measurements. BioMed Central 2023-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10685628/ /pubmed/38017463 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-023-01171-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Dong, Liang
Lu, Wei
Lu, Xuzhou
Leng, Xiaochang
Xiang, Jianping
Li, Changling
Comparison of deep learning-based image segmentation methods for intravascular ultrasound on retrospective and large image cohort study
title Comparison of deep learning-based image segmentation methods for intravascular ultrasound on retrospective and large image cohort study
title_full Comparison of deep learning-based image segmentation methods for intravascular ultrasound on retrospective and large image cohort study
title_fullStr Comparison of deep learning-based image segmentation methods for intravascular ultrasound on retrospective and large image cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of deep learning-based image segmentation methods for intravascular ultrasound on retrospective and large image cohort study
title_short Comparison of deep learning-based image segmentation methods for intravascular ultrasound on retrospective and large image cohort study
title_sort comparison of deep learning-based image segmentation methods for intravascular ultrasound on retrospective and large image cohort study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10685628/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38017463
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-023-01171-2
work_keys_str_mv AT dongliang comparisonofdeeplearningbasedimagesegmentationmethodsforintravascularultrasoundonretrospectiveandlargeimagecohortstudy
AT luwei comparisonofdeeplearningbasedimagesegmentationmethodsforintravascularultrasoundonretrospectiveandlargeimagecohortstudy
AT luxuzhou comparisonofdeeplearningbasedimagesegmentationmethodsforintravascularultrasoundonretrospectiveandlargeimagecohortstudy
AT lengxiaochang comparisonofdeeplearningbasedimagesegmentationmethodsforintravascularultrasoundonretrospectiveandlargeimagecohortstudy
AT xiangjianping comparisonofdeeplearningbasedimagesegmentationmethodsforintravascularultrasoundonretrospectiveandlargeimagecohortstudy
AT lichangling comparisonofdeeplearningbasedimagesegmentationmethodsforintravascularultrasoundonretrospectiveandlargeimagecohortstudy