Cargando…
Comparison of deep learning-based image segmentation methods for intravascular ultrasound on retrospective and large image cohort study
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the generalization performance of deep learning segmentation models on a large cohort intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) image dataset over the lumen and external elastic membrane (EEM), and to assess the consistency and accuracy of automated IVUS qu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10685628/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38017463 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-023-01171-2 |
_version_ | 1785151676312715264 |
---|---|
author | Dong, Liang Lu, Wei Lu, Xuzhou Leng, Xiaochang Xiang, Jianping Li, Changling |
author_facet | Dong, Liang Lu, Wei Lu, Xuzhou Leng, Xiaochang Xiang, Jianping Li, Changling |
author_sort | Dong, Liang |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the generalization performance of deep learning segmentation models on a large cohort intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) image dataset over the lumen and external elastic membrane (EEM), and to assess the consistency and accuracy of automated IVUS quantitative measurement parameters. METHODS: A total of 11,070 IVUS images from 113 patients and pullbacks were collected and annotated by cardiologists to train and test deep learning segmentation models. A comparison of five state of the art medical image segmentation models was performed by evaluating the segmentation of the lumen and EEM. Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), intersection over union (IoU) and Hausdorff distance (HD) were calculated for the overall and for subsets of different IVUS image categories. Further, the agreement between the IVUS quantitative measurement parameters calculated by automatic segmentation and those calculated by manual segmentation was evaluated. Finally, the segmentation performance of our model was also compared with previous studies. RESULTS: CENet achieved the best performance in DSC (0.958 for lumen, 0.921 for EEM) and IoU (0.975 for lumen, 0.951 for EEM) among all models, while Res-UNet was the best performer in HD (0.219 for lumen, 0.178 for EEM). The mean intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland–Altman plot demonstrated the extremely strong agreement (0.855, 95% CI 0.822–0.887) between model's automatic prediction and manual measurements. CONCLUSIONS: Deep learning models based on large cohort image datasets were capable of achieving state of the art (SOTA) results in lumen and EEM segmentation. It can be used for IVUS clinical evaluation and achieve excellent agreement with clinicians on quantitative parameter measurements. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10685628 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106856282023-11-30 Comparison of deep learning-based image segmentation methods for intravascular ultrasound on retrospective and large image cohort study Dong, Liang Lu, Wei Lu, Xuzhou Leng, Xiaochang Xiang, Jianping Li, Changling Biomed Eng Online Research OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the generalization performance of deep learning segmentation models on a large cohort intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) image dataset over the lumen and external elastic membrane (EEM), and to assess the consistency and accuracy of automated IVUS quantitative measurement parameters. METHODS: A total of 11,070 IVUS images from 113 patients and pullbacks were collected and annotated by cardiologists to train and test deep learning segmentation models. A comparison of five state of the art medical image segmentation models was performed by evaluating the segmentation of the lumen and EEM. Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), intersection over union (IoU) and Hausdorff distance (HD) were calculated for the overall and for subsets of different IVUS image categories. Further, the agreement between the IVUS quantitative measurement parameters calculated by automatic segmentation and those calculated by manual segmentation was evaluated. Finally, the segmentation performance of our model was also compared with previous studies. RESULTS: CENet achieved the best performance in DSC (0.958 for lumen, 0.921 for EEM) and IoU (0.975 for lumen, 0.951 for EEM) among all models, while Res-UNet was the best performer in HD (0.219 for lumen, 0.178 for EEM). The mean intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland–Altman plot demonstrated the extremely strong agreement (0.855, 95% CI 0.822–0.887) between model's automatic prediction and manual measurements. CONCLUSIONS: Deep learning models based on large cohort image datasets were capable of achieving state of the art (SOTA) results in lumen and EEM segmentation. It can be used for IVUS clinical evaluation and achieve excellent agreement with clinicians on quantitative parameter measurements. BioMed Central 2023-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10685628/ /pubmed/38017463 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-023-01171-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Dong, Liang Lu, Wei Lu, Xuzhou Leng, Xiaochang Xiang, Jianping Li, Changling Comparison of deep learning-based image segmentation methods for intravascular ultrasound on retrospective and large image cohort study |
title | Comparison of deep learning-based image segmentation methods for intravascular ultrasound on retrospective and large image cohort study |
title_full | Comparison of deep learning-based image segmentation methods for intravascular ultrasound on retrospective and large image cohort study |
title_fullStr | Comparison of deep learning-based image segmentation methods for intravascular ultrasound on retrospective and large image cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of deep learning-based image segmentation methods for intravascular ultrasound on retrospective and large image cohort study |
title_short | Comparison of deep learning-based image segmentation methods for intravascular ultrasound on retrospective and large image cohort study |
title_sort | comparison of deep learning-based image segmentation methods for intravascular ultrasound on retrospective and large image cohort study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10685628/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38017463 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-023-01171-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dongliang comparisonofdeeplearningbasedimagesegmentationmethodsforintravascularultrasoundonretrospectiveandlargeimagecohortstudy AT luwei comparisonofdeeplearningbasedimagesegmentationmethodsforintravascularultrasoundonretrospectiveandlargeimagecohortstudy AT luxuzhou comparisonofdeeplearningbasedimagesegmentationmethodsforintravascularultrasoundonretrospectiveandlargeimagecohortstudy AT lengxiaochang comparisonofdeeplearningbasedimagesegmentationmethodsforintravascularultrasoundonretrospectiveandlargeimagecohortstudy AT xiangjianping comparisonofdeeplearningbasedimagesegmentationmethodsforintravascularultrasoundonretrospectiveandlargeimagecohortstudy AT lichangling comparisonofdeeplearningbasedimagesegmentationmethodsforintravascularultrasoundonretrospectiveandlargeimagecohortstudy |