Cargando…
A qualitative study of teleconsultation practices among French oncologists in a post-COVID-19 period
BACKGROUND: The Covid-19 pandemic has prompted healthcare professionals to adapt and implement new tools to ensure continuity of patient care. Teleconsultation became the only option for some practitioners who had never used it previously and boosted its use for others who already used it. Several s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10685777/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20552076231215906 |
_version_ | 1785151701859172352 |
---|---|
author | Lantheaume, Sophie Doublet, Louis Mory, Jean-Eudes Durand, Thierry Lebosse, William Heudel, Pierre-Etienne |
author_facet | Lantheaume, Sophie Doublet, Louis Mory, Jean-Eudes Durand, Thierry Lebosse, William Heudel, Pierre-Etienne |
author_sort | Lantheaume, Sophie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Covid-19 pandemic has prompted healthcare professionals to adapt and implement new tools to ensure continuity of patient care. Teleconsultation became the only option for some practitioners who had never used it previously and boosted its use for others who already used it. Several studies have reviewed the use of teleconsultation in oncology during the epidemic, but few have addressed its continued use and how practitioners view it in a post-epidemic period. The aim of this survey was to conduct a qualitative exploration of how oncologists use teleconsultation in their daily practice in a post-COVID 19 period. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For this qualitative study, semi-structured interviews were conducted with oncologists in France who utilized teleconsultation in the field of oncology during the COVID-19 period. The interview guide included questions on the interests and limitations of using teleconsultation in oncology, on reluctance to use it among oncologists, and invited participants to formulate proposals for more optimal use. RESULTS: Fourteen oncologists participated in the survey. Currently, 12% of the consultations of the surveyed practitioners are conducted via teleconsultation. Seven themes were identified in the analysis of the interviews: (a) The oncologist and teleconsultation; (b) Clinical motivations for using teleconsultation; (c) Comparison between teleconsultation and in-person consultation; (d) Advantages and disadvantages of teleconsultation; (e) Technical modalities of teleconsultation; (f) Role of Covid and confinement in the use of teleconsultation; (h) Epistemic judgments about teleconsultation. Optimal teleconsultation occurs when seamlessly incorporated into patient care, offering reduced patient inconvenience, and providing economic and environmental benefits. Although there's a lack of unified agreement in research literature regarding time efficiency, teleconsultation facilitates more customized patient monitoring and addresses the challenge of “medical deserts” nationally. Considering patient preferences is crucial when contemplating the use of teleconsultation. Predominantly, technical issues stand as the principal barriers to teleconsultation implementation. CONCLUSION: Even after the end of the health crisis, teleconsultation is still used in clinical practice. Recommendations for effective use are suggested. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10685777 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106857772023-11-30 A qualitative study of teleconsultation practices among French oncologists in a post-COVID-19 period Lantheaume, Sophie Doublet, Louis Mory, Jean-Eudes Durand, Thierry Lebosse, William Heudel, Pierre-Etienne Digit Health Best Practice BACKGROUND: The Covid-19 pandemic has prompted healthcare professionals to adapt and implement new tools to ensure continuity of patient care. Teleconsultation became the only option for some practitioners who had never used it previously and boosted its use for others who already used it. Several studies have reviewed the use of teleconsultation in oncology during the epidemic, but few have addressed its continued use and how practitioners view it in a post-epidemic period. The aim of this survey was to conduct a qualitative exploration of how oncologists use teleconsultation in their daily practice in a post-COVID 19 period. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For this qualitative study, semi-structured interviews were conducted with oncologists in France who utilized teleconsultation in the field of oncology during the COVID-19 period. The interview guide included questions on the interests and limitations of using teleconsultation in oncology, on reluctance to use it among oncologists, and invited participants to formulate proposals for more optimal use. RESULTS: Fourteen oncologists participated in the survey. Currently, 12% of the consultations of the surveyed practitioners are conducted via teleconsultation. Seven themes were identified in the analysis of the interviews: (a) The oncologist and teleconsultation; (b) Clinical motivations for using teleconsultation; (c) Comparison between teleconsultation and in-person consultation; (d) Advantages and disadvantages of teleconsultation; (e) Technical modalities of teleconsultation; (f) Role of Covid and confinement in the use of teleconsultation; (h) Epistemic judgments about teleconsultation. Optimal teleconsultation occurs when seamlessly incorporated into patient care, offering reduced patient inconvenience, and providing economic and environmental benefits. Although there's a lack of unified agreement in research literature regarding time efficiency, teleconsultation facilitates more customized patient monitoring and addresses the challenge of “medical deserts” nationally. Considering patient preferences is crucial when contemplating the use of teleconsultation. Predominantly, technical issues stand as the principal barriers to teleconsultation implementation. CONCLUSION: Even after the end of the health crisis, teleconsultation is still used in clinical practice. Recommendations for effective use are suggested. SAGE Publications 2023-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10685777/ /pubmed/38033511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20552076231215906 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Best Practice Lantheaume, Sophie Doublet, Louis Mory, Jean-Eudes Durand, Thierry Lebosse, William Heudel, Pierre-Etienne A qualitative study of teleconsultation practices among French oncologists in a post-COVID-19 period |
title | A qualitative study of teleconsultation practices among French oncologists in a post-COVID-19 period |
title_full | A qualitative study of teleconsultation practices among French oncologists in a post-COVID-19 period |
title_fullStr | A qualitative study of teleconsultation practices among French oncologists in a post-COVID-19 period |
title_full_unstemmed | A qualitative study of teleconsultation practices among French oncologists in a post-COVID-19 period |
title_short | A qualitative study of teleconsultation practices among French oncologists in a post-COVID-19 period |
title_sort | qualitative study of teleconsultation practices among french oncologists in a post-covid-19 period |
topic | Best Practice |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10685777/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20552076231215906 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lantheaumesophie aqualitativestudyofteleconsultationpracticesamongfrenchoncologistsinapostcovid19period AT doubletlouis aqualitativestudyofteleconsultationpracticesamongfrenchoncologistsinapostcovid19period AT moryjeaneudes aqualitativestudyofteleconsultationpracticesamongfrenchoncologistsinapostcovid19period AT durandthierry aqualitativestudyofteleconsultationpracticesamongfrenchoncologistsinapostcovid19period AT lebossewilliam aqualitativestudyofteleconsultationpracticesamongfrenchoncologistsinapostcovid19period AT heudelpierreetienne aqualitativestudyofteleconsultationpracticesamongfrenchoncologistsinapostcovid19period AT lantheaumesophie qualitativestudyofteleconsultationpracticesamongfrenchoncologistsinapostcovid19period AT doubletlouis qualitativestudyofteleconsultationpracticesamongfrenchoncologistsinapostcovid19period AT moryjeaneudes qualitativestudyofteleconsultationpracticesamongfrenchoncologistsinapostcovid19period AT durandthierry qualitativestudyofteleconsultationpracticesamongfrenchoncologistsinapostcovid19period AT lebossewilliam qualitativestudyofteleconsultationpracticesamongfrenchoncologistsinapostcovid19period AT heudelpierreetienne qualitativestudyofteleconsultationpracticesamongfrenchoncologistsinapostcovid19period |