Cargando…

Nonface-to-Face Visitation to Restrict Patient Visits for Infection Control: Integrative Review

BACKGROUND: In the COVID-19 pandemic, a visit restriction policy for patients has been implemented in medical institutions worldwide and visits are being made using alternative communication technologies. This shift has also required the use of platforms to prevent negative consequences of these res...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jeong, Hyunwoo, Choi, Yonsu, Kim, Heejung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10686251/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38015595
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/43572
_version_ 1785151753945088000
author Jeong, Hyunwoo
Choi, Yonsu
Kim, Heejung
author_facet Jeong, Hyunwoo
Choi, Yonsu
Kim, Heejung
author_sort Jeong, Hyunwoo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In the COVID-19 pandemic, a visit restriction policy for patients has been implemented in medical institutions worldwide and visits are being made using alternative communication technologies. This shift has also required the use of platforms to prevent negative consequences of these restrictions. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this review was to comprehensively explore nonface-to-face visits as an alternative during infection prevention and to synthesize the scientific evidence of their benefits and disadvantages. METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted via the PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane, and Web of Science electronic databases; unpublished trials in the clinical trials register ClinicalTrials.gov; and Virginia Henderson International Nursing Library up to September 10, 2021. The search query was developed according to the guidelines of the Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies and included keywords on the topics of telemedicine and visitation restrictions. The inclusion criteria were a nonface-to-face modality using telemedicine with family in a hospital setting, experimental and observational studies, and articles written in English. The exclusion criteria were inaccessible in full text, not related to patient or family involvement, mainly focused on the study protocol, or only discussing the pros and cons of telemedicine. RESULTS: Overall, patients’ families experienced emotional distress due to restrictions on face-to-face visits. Nonface-to-face virtual visits compensating for these restrictions had a positive effect on reducing the risk of infection to the patient and the family. This further encouraged psychological and physical recovery and decreased psychological distress. However, nonface-to-face virtual technology could not replace the existence of actual families, and technical problems with networks and devices are reported as limitations. CONCLUSIONS: Ensuring the availability of technology and educating on the same in alignment with the characteristics of patients and their families, nonface-to-face virtual visits need to show more potential as an effective patient-centered treatment strategy based on more research and advanced practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10686251
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106862512023-11-30 Nonface-to-Face Visitation to Restrict Patient Visits for Infection Control: Integrative Review Jeong, Hyunwoo Choi, Yonsu Kim, Heejung Interact J Med Res Review BACKGROUND: In the COVID-19 pandemic, a visit restriction policy for patients has been implemented in medical institutions worldwide and visits are being made using alternative communication technologies. This shift has also required the use of platforms to prevent negative consequences of these restrictions. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this review was to comprehensively explore nonface-to-face visits as an alternative during infection prevention and to synthesize the scientific evidence of their benefits and disadvantages. METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted via the PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane, and Web of Science electronic databases; unpublished trials in the clinical trials register ClinicalTrials.gov; and Virginia Henderson International Nursing Library up to September 10, 2021. The search query was developed according to the guidelines of the Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies and included keywords on the topics of telemedicine and visitation restrictions. The inclusion criteria were a nonface-to-face modality using telemedicine with family in a hospital setting, experimental and observational studies, and articles written in English. The exclusion criteria were inaccessible in full text, not related to patient or family involvement, mainly focused on the study protocol, or only discussing the pros and cons of telemedicine. RESULTS: Overall, patients’ families experienced emotional distress due to restrictions on face-to-face visits. Nonface-to-face virtual visits compensating for these restrictions had a positive effect on reducing the risk of infection to the patient and the family. This further encouraged psychological and physical recovery and decreased psychological distress. However, nonface-to-face virtual technology could not replace the existence of actual families, and technical problems with networks and devices are reported as limitations. CONCLUSIONS: Ensuring the availability of technology and educating on the same in alignment with the characteristics of patients and their families, nonface-to-face virtual visits need to show more potential as an effective patient-centered treatment strategy based on more research and advanced practice. JMIR Publications 2023-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10686251/ /pubmed/38015595 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/43572 Text en ©Hyunwoo Jeong, Yonsu Choi, Heejung Kim. Originally published in the Interactive Journal of Medical Research (https://www.i-jmr.org/), 28.11.2023. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Interactive Journal of Medical Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.i-jmr.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Review
Jeong, Hyunwoo
Choi, Yonsu
Kim, Heejung
Nonface-to-Face Visitation to Restrict Patient Visits for Infection Control: Integrative Review
title Nonface-to-Face Visitation to Restrict Patient Visits for Infection Control: Integrative Review
title_full Nonface-to-Face Visitation to Restrict Patient Visits for Infection Control: Integrative Review
title_fullStr Nonface-to-Face Visitation to Restrict Patient Visits for Infection Control: Integrative Review
title_full_unstemmed Nonface-to-Face Visitation to Restrict Patient Visits for Infection Control: Integrative Review
title_short Nonface-to-Face Visitation to Restrict Patient Visits for Infection Control: Integrative Review
title_sort nonface-to-face visitation to restrict patient visits for infection control: integrative review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10686251/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38015595
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/43572
work_keys_str_mv AT jeonghyunwoo nonfacetofacevisitationtorestrictpatientvisitsforinfectioncontrolintegrativereview
AT choiyonsu nonfacetofacevisitationtorestrictpatientvisitsforinfectioncontrolintegrativereview
AT kimheejung nonfacetofacevisitationtorestrictpatientvisitsforinfectioncontrolintegrativereview