Cargando…

Five-year outcomes of digital diabetic eye screening in individuals aged 80 and 85 years

OBJECTIVE: To assess the incidence of referable diabetic retinopathy (DR) in patients aged 80 and 85 years to determine whether screening interval can be extended safely in this age group. METHODS: Patients who were aged 80 and 85 years when they attended digital screening during April 2014–March 20...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thomas, Kevin, Albutt, Nichola, Hamid, Aisha, Wharton, Helen, Jacob, Sarita
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10686376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37210455
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41433-023-02577-x
_version_ 1785151767903731712
author Thomas, Kevin
Albutt, Nichola
Hamid, Aisha
Wharton, Helen
Jacob, Sarita
author_facet Thomas, Kevin
Albutt, Nichola
Hamid, Aisha
Wharton, Helen
Jacob, Sarita
author_sort Thomas, Kevin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess the incidence of referable diabetic retinopathy (DR) in patients aged 80 and 85 years to determine whether screening interval can be extended safely in this age group. METHODS: Patients who were aged 80 and 85 years when they attended digital screening during April 2014–March 2015 were included. Screening results at baseline and over the next four years were analysed. RESULTS: 1880 patients aged 80 and 1105 patients aged 85 were included. Patients referred to hospital eye service (HES) for DR ranged from 0.7% to 1.4% in the 80-year-old cohort over 5 years. In this cohort a total of 76 (4%) were referred to HES for DR, of which 11 (0.6%) received treatment. Over the course of the follow up (FU), 403 (21%) died. In the 85-year-old cohort, referral to HES for DR each year ranged from 0.1% to 1.3%. In this cohort a total of 27 (2.4%) were referred to HES for DR, of which 4 (0.4%) received treatment. Over the course of follow-up 541(49%) died. All treated cases were for maculopathy in both cohorts and there were no cases of proliferative diabetic retinopathy requiring treatment. CONCLUSION: This study showed that the risk of progression of retinopathy is quite low in this age group and only a small proportion of patients developed referable retinopathy requiring treatment. This suggests relooking at the need for screening and ideal screening intervals in patients aged 80 years and over with no referable DR as they can be potentially classed as a group with low risk of sight loss.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10686376
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106863762023-11-30 Five-year outcomes of digital diabetic eye screening in individuals aged 80 and 85 years Thomas, Kevin Albutt, Nichola Hamid, Aisha Wharton, Helen Jacob, Sarita Eye (Lond) Article OBJECTIVE: To assess the incidence of referable diabetic retinopathy (DR) in patients aged 80 and 85 years to determine whether screening interval can be extended safely in this age group. METHODS: Patients who were aged 80 and 85 years when they attended digital screening during April 2014–March 2015 were included. Screening results at baseline and over the next four years were analysed. RESULTS: 1880 patients aged 80 and 1105 patients aged 85 were included. Patients referred to hospital eye service (HES) for DR ranged from 0.7% to 1.4% in the 80-year-old cohort over 5 years. In this cohort a total of 76 (4%) were referred to HES for DR, of which 11 (0.6%) received treatment. Over the course of the follow up (FU), 403 (21%) died. In the 85-year-old cohort, referral to HES for DR each year ranged from 0.1% to 1.3%. In this cohort a total of 27 (2.4%) were referred to HES for DR, of which 4 (0.4%) received treatment. Over the course of follow-up 541(49%) died. All treated cases were for maculopathy in both cohorts and there were no cases of proliferative diabetic retinopathy requiring treatment. CONCLUSION: This study showed that the risk of progression of retinopathy is quite low in this age group and only a small proportion of patients developed referable retinopathy requiring treatment. This suggests relooking at the need for screening and ideal screening intervals in patients aged 80 years and over with no referable DR as they can be potentially classed as a group with low risk of sight loss. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-05-20 2023-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10686376/ /pubmed/37210455 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41433-023-02577-x Text en © Crown 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Thomas, Kevin
Albutt, Nichola
Hamid, Aisha
Wharton, Helen
Jacob, Sarita
Five-year outcomes of digital diabetic eye screening in individuals aged 80 and 85 years
title Five-year outcomes of digital diabetic eye screening in individuals aged 80 and 85 years
title_full Five-year outcomes of digital diabetic eye screening in individuals aged 80 and 85 years
title_fullStr Five-year outcomes of digital diabetic eye screening in individuals aged 80 and 85 years
title_full_unstemmed Five-year outcomes of digital diabetic eye screening in individuals aged 80 and 85 years
title_short Five-year outcomes of digital diabetic eye screening in individuals aged 80 and 85 years
title_sort five-year outcomes of digital diabetic eye screening in individuals aged 80 and 85 years
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10686376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37210455
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41433-023-02577-x
work_keys_str_mv AT thomaskevin fiveyearoutcomesofdigitaldiabeticeyescreeninginindividualsaged80and85years
AT albuttnichola fiveyearoutcomesofdigitaldiabeticeyescreeninginindividualsaged80and85years
AT hamidaisha fiveyearoutcomesofdigitaldiabeticeyescreeninginindividualsaged80and85years
AT whartonhelen fiveyearoutcomesofdigitaldiabeticeyescreeninginindividualsaged80and85years
AT jacobsarita fiveyearoutcomesofdigitaldiabeticeyescreeninginindividualsaged80and85years