Cargando…

Influence of Intraoral Scanners, Operators, and Data Processing on Dimensional Accuracy of Dental Casts for Unsupervised Clinical Machine Learning: An In Vitro Comparative Study

PURPOSE: This study assessed the impact of intraoral scanner type, operator, and data augmentation on the dimensional accuracy of in vitro dental cast digital scans. It also evaluated the validation accuracy of an unsupervised machine-learning model trained with these scans. METHODS: Twenty-two dent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Farook, Taseef Hasan, Ahmed, Saif, Giri, Jamal, Rashid, Farah, Hughes, Toby, Dudley, James
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10686707/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033456
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/7542813
_version_ 1785151821879181312
author Farook, Taseef Hasan
Ahmed, Saif
Giri, Jamal
Rashid, Farah
Hughes, Toby
Dudley, James
author_facet Farook, Taseef Hasan
Ahmed, Saif
Giri, Jamal
Rashid, Farah
Hughes, Toby
Dudley, James
author_sort Farook, Taseef Hasan
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study assessed the impact of intraoral scanner type, operator, and data augmentation on the dimensional accuracy of in vitro dental cast digital scans. It also evaluated the validation accuracy of an unsupervised machine-learning model trained with these scans. METHODS: Twenty-two dental casts were scanned using two handheld intraoral scanners and one laboratory scanner, resulting in 110 3D cast scans across five independent groups. The scans underwent uniform augmentation and were validated using Hausdorff's distance (HD) and root mean squared error (RMSE), with the laboratory scanner as reference. A 3-factor analysis of variance examined interactions between scanners, operators, and augmentation methods. Scans were divided into training and validation sets and processed through a pretrained 3D visual transformer, and validation accuracy was assessed for each of the five groups. RESULTS: No significant differences in HD and RMSE were found across handheld scanners and operators. However, significant changes in RMSE were observed between native and augmented scans with no specific interaction between scanner or operator. The 3D visual transformer achieved 96.2% validation accuracy for differentiating upper and lower scans in the augmented dataset. Native scans lacked volumetric depth, preventing their use for deep learning. CONCLUSION: Scanner, operator, and processing method did not significantly affect the dimensional accuracy of 3D scans for unsupervised deep learning. However, data augmentation was crucial for processing intraoral scans in deep learning algorithms, introducing structural differences in the 3D scans. Clinical Significance. The specific type of intraoral scanner or the operator has no substantial influence on the quality of the generated 3D scans, but controlled data augmentation of the native scans is necessary to obtain reliable results with unsupervised deep learning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10686707
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106867072023-11-30 Influence of Intraoral Scanners, Operators, and Data Processing on Dimensional Accuracy of Dental Casts for Unsupervised Clinical Machine Learning: An In Vitro Comparative Study Farook, Taseef Hasan Ahmed, Saif Giri, Jamal Rashid, Farah Hughes, Toby Dudley, James Int J Dent Research Article PURPOSE: This study assessed the impact of intraoral scanner type, operator, and data augmentation on the dimensional accuracy of in vitro dental cast digital scans. It also evaluated the validation accuracy of an unsupervised machine-learning model trained with these scans. METHODS: Twenty-two dental casts were scanned using two handheld intraoral scanners and one laboratory scanner, resulting in 110 3D cast scans across five independent groups. The scans underwent uniform augmentation and were validated using Hausdorff's distance (HD) and root mean squared error (RMSE), with the laboratory scanner as reference. A 3-factor analysis of variance examined interactions between scanners, operators, and augmentation methods. Scans were divided into training and validation sets and processed through a pretrained 3D visual transformer, and validation accuracy was assessed for each of the five groups. RESULTS: No significant differences in HD and RMSE were found across handheld scanners and operators. However, significant changes in RMSE were observed between native and augmented scans with no specific interaction between scanner or operator. The 3D visual transformer achieved 96.2% validation accuracy for differentiating upper and lower scans in the augmented dataset. Native scans lacked volumetric depth, preventing their use for deep learning. CONCLUSION: Scanner, operator, and processing method did not significantly affect the dimensional accuracy of 3D scans for unsupervised deep learning. However, data augmentation was crucial for processing intraoral scans in deep learning algorithms, introducing structural differences in the 3D scans. Clinical Significance. The specific type of intraoral scanner or the operator has no substantial influence on the quality of the generated 3D scans, but controlled data augmentation of the native scans is necessary to obtain reliable results with unsupervised deep learning. Hindawi 2023-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10686707/ /pubmed/38033456 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/7542813 Text en Copyright © 2023 Taseef Hasan Farook et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Farook, Taseef Hasan
Ahmed, Saif
Giri, Jamal
Rashid, Farah
Hughes, Toby
Dudley, James
Influence of Intraoral Scanners, Operators, and Data Processing on Dimensional Accuracy of Dental Casts for Unsupervised Clinical Machine Learning: An In Vitro Comparative Study
title Influence of Intraoral Scanners, Operators, and Data Processing on Dimensional Accuracy of Dental Casts for Unsupervised Clinical Machine Learning: An In Vitro Comparative Study
title_full Influence of Intraoral Scanners, Operators, and Data Processing on Dimensional Accuracy of Dental Casts for Unsupervised Clinical Machine Learning: An In Vitro Comparative Study
title_fullStr Influence of Intraoral Scanners, Operators, and Data Processing on Dimensional Accuracy of Dental Casts for Unsupervised Clinical Machine Learning: An In Vitro Comparative Study
title_full_unstemmed Influence of Intraoral Scanners, Operators, and Data Processing on Dimensional Accuracy of Dental Casts for Unsupervised Clinical Machine Learning: An In Vitro Comparative Study
title_short Influence of Intraoral Scanners, Operators, and Data Processing on Dimensional Accuracy of Dental Casts for Unsupervised Clinical Machine Learning: An In Vitro Comparative Study
title_sort influence of intraoral scanners, operators, and data processing on dimensional accuracy of dental casts for unsupervised clinical machine learning: an in vitro comparative study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10686707/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033456
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/7542813
work_keys_str_mv AT farooktaseefhasan influenceofintraoralscannersoperatorsanddataprocessingondimensionalaccuracyofdentalcastsforunsupervisedclinicalmachinelearninganinvitrocomparativestudy
AT ahmedsaif influenceofintraoralscannersoperatorsanddataprocessingondimensionalaccuracyofdentalcastsforunsupervisedclinicalmachinelearninganinvitrocomparativestudy
AT girijamal influenceofintraoralscannersoperatorsanddataprocessingondimensionalaccuracyofdentalcastsforunsupervisedclinicalmachinelearninganinvitrocomparativestudy
AT rashidfarah influenceofintraoralscannersoperatorsanddataprocessingondimensionalaccuracyofdentalcastsforunsupervisedclinicalmachinelearninganinvitrocomparativestudy
AT hughestoby influenceofintraoralscannersoperatorsanddataprocessingondimensionalaccuracyofdentalcastsforunsupervisedclinicalmachinelearninganinvitrocomparativestudy
AT dudleyjames influenceofintraoralscannersoperatorsanddataprocessingondimensionalaccuracyofdentalcastsforunsupervisedclinicalmachinelearninganinvitrocomparativestudy