Cargando…

Valvulotomy of the great saphenous vein in ex situ non-reversed and in situ setting: a multicenter post-market study to assess the safety and efficacy of the AndraValvulotome™”

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and technical success of the AndraValvulotome™ device (Andramed GmbH, Reutlingen, Germany) in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) requiring bypass surgery using the great saphenous vein (GSV) as graft. METHODS: This was a multicenter, post-market observati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Souri, Yaser, Liebetrau, Dominik, Hyhlik-Dürr, Alexander
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10687093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38030864
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-023-03189-5
_version_ 1785151906750922752
author Souri, Yaser
Liebetrau, Dominik
Hyhlik-Dürr, Alexander
author_facet Souri, Yaser
Liebetrau, Dominik
Hyhlik-Dürr, Alexander
author_sort Souri, Yaser
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and technical success of the AndraValvulotome™ device (Andramed GmbH, Reutlingen, Germany) in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) requiring bypass surgery using the great saphenous vein (GSV) as graft. METHODS: This was a multicenter, post-market observational study conducted in 2021 in 11 German centers. Safety and efficacy data were prospectively collected and analyzed. Primary endpoints were the absence of device-related serious adverse events until 30 ± 7 days follow-up, the clinical efficacy of valvulotomy, which was defined as pulsatile blood flow in the bypass and the number of insufficiently destroyed vein valves. Secondary endpoints were the number of valvulotomy passages, the primary patency rate of the venous bypass (determined by a color-duplex sonography showing a normal blood flow through the bypass and absence of stenosis or occlusion), and the primary technical success defined as the absence of product-specific (serious) adverse events and clinical efficacy. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients were enrolled. The mean age of the patients was 71 years (46–91), and 74.6% were males. The vein material used for bypass grafting had a median length of 47.5 cm (range 20–70 cm) with a median diameter of 5.0 mm (range 3–6 mm) and 4.0 mm (range 2–6 mm) in the proximal and distal segments, respectively. The technical success rate was 96.6%. The primary patency rate was 89.9% at 30 days follow-up. The clinical efficacy was rated as very good in 81% of patients, fair in 17%, and poor in 2%. Between 1 and 5 (average 2.9) valvulotome passages were performed. One product-related serious adverse event was recorded (bypass vein dissection). CONCLUSION: The AndraValvulotome™ can be considered a safe and effective device to disrupt venous valves during in situ non-reversed bypass surgeries using GSV grafts in patients with PAD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10687093
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106870932023-12-01 Valvulotomy of the great saphenous vein in ex situ non-reversed and in situ setting: a multicenter post-market study to assess the safety and efficacy of the AndraValvulotome™” Souri, Yaser Liebetrau, Dominik Hyhlik-Dürr, Alexander Langenbecks Arch Surg Research PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and technical success of the AndraValvulotome™ device (Andramed GmbH, Reutlingen, Germany) in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) requiring bypass surgery using the great saphenous vein (GSV) as graft. METHODS: This was a multicenter, post-market observational study conducted in 2021 in 11 German centers. Safety and efficacy data were prospectively collected and analyzed. Primary endpoints were the absence of device-related serious adverse events until 30 ± 7 days follow-up, the clinical efficacy of valvulotomy, which was defined as pulsatile blood flow in the bypass and the number of insufficiently destroyed vein valves. Secondary endpoints were the number of valvulotomy passages, the primary patency rate of the venous bypass (determined by a color-duplex sonography showing a normal blood flow through the bypass and absence of stenosis or occlusion), and the primary technical success defined as the absence of product-specific (serious) adverse events and clinical efficacy. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients were enrolled. The mean age of the patients was 71 years (46–91), and 74.6% were males. The vein material used for bypass grafting had a median length of 47.5 cm (range 20–70 cm) with a median diameter of 5.0 mm (range 3–6 mm) and 4.0 mm (range 2–6 mm) in the proximal and distal segments, respectively. The technical success rate was 96.6%. The primary patency rate was 89.9% at 30 days follow-up. The clinical efficacy was rated as very good in 81% of patients, fair in 17%, and poor in 2%. Between 1 and 5 (average 2.9) valvulotome passages were performed. One product-related serious adverse event was recorded (bypass vein dissection). CONCLUSION: The AndraValvulotome™ can be considered a safe and effective device to disrupt venous valves during in situ non-reversed bypass surgeries using GSV grafts in patients with PAD. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-11-30 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10687093/ /pubmed/38030864 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-023-03189-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Souri, Yaser
Liebetrau, Dominik
Hyhlik-Dürr, Alexander
Valvulotomy of the great saphenous vein in ex situ non-reversed and in situ setting: a multicenter post-market study to assess the safety and efficacy of the AndraValvulotome™”
title Valvulotomy of the great saphenous vein in ex situ non-reversed and in situ setting: a multicenter post-market study to assess the safety and efficacy of the AndraValvulotome™”
title_full Valvulotomy of the great saphenous vein in ex situ non-reversed and in situ setting: a multicenter post-market study to assess the safety and efficacy of the AndraValvulotome™”
title_fullStr Valvulotomy of the great saphenous vein in ex situ non-reversed and in situ setting: a multicenter post-market study to assess the safety and efficacy of the AndraValvulotome™”
title_full_unstemmed Valvulotomy of the great saphenous vein in ex situ non-reversed and in situ setting: a multicenter post-market study to assess the safety and efficacy of the AndraValvulotome™”
title_short Valvulotomy of the great saphenous vein in ex situ non-reversed and in situ setting: a multicenter post-market study to assess the safety and efficacy of the AndraValvulotome™”
title_sort valvulotomy of the great saphenous vein in ex situ non-reversed and in situ setting: a multicenter post-market study to assess the safety and efficacy of the andravalvulotome™”
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10687093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38030864
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-023-03189-5
work_keys_str_mv AT souriyaser valvulotomyofthegreatsaphenousveininexsitunonreversedandinsitusettingamulticenterpostmarketstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyoftheandravalvulotome
AT liebetraudominik valvulotomyofthegreatsaphenousveininexsitunonreversedandinsitusettingamulticenterpostmarketstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyoftheandravalvulotome
AT hyhlikdurralexander valvulotomyofthegreatsaphenousveininexsitunonreversedandinsitusettingamulticenterpostmarketstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyoftheandravalvulotome
AT valvulotomyofthegreatsaphenousveininexsitunonreversedandinsitusettingamulticenterpostmarketstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyoftheandravalvulotome