Cargando…

Coaches’ Perceptions of Factors Driving Training Adaptation: An International Survey

OBJECTIVE: We surveyed coaches’ views on topics related to the training process to elucidate whether their opinions are aligned with the current literature. Here the results for a sub-set of questions regarding factors affecting the training adaptation process are presented and discussed. METHODS: 1...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anyadike-Danes, Kechi, Donath, Lars, Kiely, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10687123/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37552460
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40279-023-01894-1
_version_ 1785151913502703616
author Anyadike-Danes, Kechi
Donath, Lars
Kiely, John
author_facet Anyadike-Danes, Kechi
Donath, Lars
Kiely, John
author_sort Anyadike-Danes, Kechi
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: We surveyed coaches’ views on topics related to the training process to elucidate whether their opinions are aligned with the current literature. Here the results for a sub-set of questions regarding factors affecting the training adaptation process are presented and discussed. METHODS: 106 coaches [age range 18–65 + years, 31% 15 + years coaching, 58% individual-events/sports and 32% international level] from a number of countries completed a novel cross-sectional online survey about the planning of training and the training process. RESULTS: Only 28% of participants indicated that physical training was the most important factor in determining sport performance; whereas 99% indicated non-physical factors influence physical training response. The top five factors in modifying an athlete’s ability to physically adapt to a training plan, as rated ‘absolutely essential’, were ‘coach-athlete relationship’ (56%), ‘life stress’ (41%), ‘athletes’ belief in the plan’ (37%), ‘psychological and emotional stress’ (35%) and ‘physical training’ (33%). CONCLUSIONS: Amongst coaches surveyed less than a third rated physical training as the most important factor in determining sports performance. Non-physical factors were acknowledged by the majority to exert an influence on physical training response and adaptation, despite the lack of discussion in training research, though there was no consensus on the relative importance of each individual factor. We echo previous sentiments that coaches need to be engaged in the research process. If training research continues as present the field runs the risk of not only becoming detached but increasingly irrelevant to those it is trying to help. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40279-023-01894-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10687123
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106871232023-12-01 Coaches’ Perceptions of Factors Driving Training Adaptation: An International Survey Anyadike-Danes, Kechi Donath, Lars Kiely, John Sports Med Original Research Article OBJECTIVE: We surveyed coaches’ views on topics related to the training process to elucidate whether their opinions are aligned with the current literature. Here the results for a sub-set of questions regarding factors affecting the training adaptation process are presented and discussed. METHODS: 106 coaches [age range 18–65 + years, 31% 15 + years coaching, 58% individual-events/sports and 32% international level] from a number of countries completed a novel cross-sectional online survey about the planning of training and the training process. RESULTS: Only 28% of participants indicated that physical training was the most important factor in determining sport performance; whereas 99% indicated non-physical factors influence physical training response. The top five factors in modifying an athlete’s ability to physically adapt to a training plan, as rated ‘absolutely essential’, were ‘coach-athlete relationship’ (56%), ‘life stress’ (41%), ‘athletes’ belief in the plan’ (37%), ‘psychological and emotional stress’ (35%) and ‘physical training’ (33%). CONCLUSIONS: Amongst coaches surveyed less than a third rated physical training as the most important factor in determining sports performance. Non-physical factors were acknowledged by the majority to exert an influence on physical training response and adaptation, despite the lack of discussion in training research, though there was no consensus on the relative importance of each individual factor. We echo previous sentiments that coaches need to be engaged in the research process. If training research continues as present the field runs the risk of not only becoming detached but increasingly irrelevant to those it is trying to help. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40279-023-01894-1. Springer International Publishing 2023-08-08 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10687123/ /pubmed/37552460 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40279-023-01894-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Anyadike-Danes, Kechi
Donath, Lars
Kiely, John
Coaches’ Perceptions of Factors Driving Training Adaptation: An International Survey
title Coaches’ Perceptions of Factors Driving Training Adaptation: An International Survey
title_full Coaches’ Perceptions of Factors Driving Training Adaptation: An International Survey
title_fullStr Coaches’ Perceptions of Factors Driving Training Adaptation: An International Survey
title_full_unstemmed Coaches’ Perceptions of Factors Driving Training Adaptation: An International Survey
title_short Coaches’ Perceptions of Factors Driving Training Adaptation: An International Survey
title_sort coaches’ perceptions of factors driving training adaptation: an international survey
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10687123/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37552460
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40279-023-01894-1
work_keys_str_mv AT anyadikedaneskechi coachesperceptionsoffactorsdrivingtrainingadaptationaninternationalsurvey
AT donathlars coachesperceptionsoffactorsdrivingtrainingadaptationaninternationalsurvey
AT kielyjohn coachesperceptionsoffactorsdrivingtrainingadaptationaninternationalsurvey