Cargando…
Comparison of 1064-nm Nd:YAG picosecond laser using fractional micro-lens array vs. ablative fractional 2940-nm Er:YAG laser for the treatment of atrophic acne scar in Asians: a 20-week prospective, randomized, split-face, controlled pilot study
BACKGROUND: The 1064-nm Nd:YAG picosecond lasers using fractional micro-lens array (P-MLA) was a promising therapy for skin resurfacing. However, no studies have compared P-MLA with ablative fractional 2940-nm Er:YAG lasers (AF-Er) in the treatment of atrophic acne scars. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10687437/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38034535 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1248831 |
_version_ | 1785151978313089024 |
---|---|
author | Dai, Ru Cao, Yiyu Su, Yiping Cai, Suiqing |
author_facet | Dai, Ru Cao, Yiyu Su, Yiping Cai, Suiqing |
author_sort | Dai, Ru |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The 1064-nm Nd:YAG picosecond lasers using fractional micro-lens array (P-MLA) was a promising therapy for skin resurfacing. However, no studies have compared P-MLA with ablative fractional 2940-nm Er:YAG lasers (AF-Er) in the treatment of atrophic acne scars. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of P-MLA and AF-Er for the treatment of atrophic acne scars. METHODS: We performed a prospective, randomized, split-face, controlled pilot study. Thirty-one Asian patients with mild to moderate atrophic acne scars underwent four consecutive sessions of randomized split-face treatment with P-MLA and AF-Fr at 4-week intervals. The efficacy of the two devices were evaluated by Echelle d’Evaluation Clinique des Cicatrices d’acne (ECCA) grading scale, Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA) score and patient’s satisfaction. VISIA analysis was also performed to evaluate the pore and skin texture. Adverse events were recorded at each follow-up. RESULTS: The P-MLA afforded comparable clinical responses in scar appearance as AF-Er based on the investigator’s assessments (ECCA percent reduction: 39.11% vs. 43.73%; IGA score: 2.97 ± 0.65 vs. 3.16 ± 0.68; P > 0.05 for both). However, the result of patient satisfaction indicated the AF-Er-treated side achieved a slightly greater improvement in scar appearance (3.97 ± 0.78 vs. 3.55 ± 0.71; P < 0.05). Overall, the two devices did not differ largely in terms of efficacy. VISIA analysis revealed similar changing patterns of the pore and skin texture between two devices. For safety profiles, no serious side effects were reported on both sides. The P-MLA showed lower pain level, shortened duration of crust shed and edema, and less occurrence of PIH (P < 0.05 for all). CONCLUSION: Compared with AF-Er, P-MLA afforded comparable effect and more safety profiles in treating atrophic acne scars in Asian patients. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT 05686603. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10687437 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106874372023-11-30 Comparison of 1064-nm Nd:YAG picosecond laser using fractional micro-lens array vs. ablative fractional 2940-nm Er:YAG laser for the treatment of atrophic acne scar in Asians: a 20-week prospective, randomized, split-face, controlled pilot study Dai, Ru Cao, Yiyu Su, Yiping Cai, Suiqing Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine BACKGROUND: The 1064-nm Nd:YAG picosecond lasers using fractional micro-lens array (P-MLA) was a promising therapy for skin resurfacing. However, no studies have compared P-MLA with ablative fractional 2940-nm Er:YAG lasers (AF-Er) in the treatment of atrophic acne scars. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of P-MLA and AF-Er for the treatment of atrophic acne scars. METHODS: We performed a prospective, randomized, split-face, controlled pilot study. Thirty-one Asian patients with mild to moderate atrophic acne scars underwent four consecutive sessions of randomized split-face treatment with P-MLA and AF-Fr at 4-week intervals. The efficacy of the two devices were evaluated by Echelle d’Evaluation Clinique des Cicatrices d’acne (ECCA) grading scale, Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA) score and patient’s satisfaction. VISIA analysis was also performed to evaluate the pore and skin texture. Adverse events were recorded at each follow-up. RESULTS: The P-MLA afforded comparable clinical responses in scar appearance as AF-Er based on the investigator’s assessments (ECCA percent reduction: 39.11% vs. 43.73%; IGA score: 2.97 ± 0.65 vs. 3.16 ± 0.68; P > 0.05 for both). However, the result of patient satisfaction indicated the AF-Er-treated side achieved a slightly greater improvement in scar appearance (3.97 ± 0.78 vs. 3.55 ± 0.71; P < 0.05). Overall, the two devices did not differ largely in terms of efficacy. VISIA analysis revealed similar changing patterns of the pore and skin texture between two devices. For safety profiles, no serious side effects were reported on both sides. The P-MLA showed lower pain level, shortened duration of crust shed and edema, and less occurrence of PIH (P < 0.05 for all). CONCLUSION: Compared with AF-Er, P-MLA afforded comparable effect and more safety profiles in treating atrophic acne scars in Asian patients. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT 05686603. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10687437/ /pubmed/38034535 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1248831 Text en Copyright © 2023 Dai, Cao, Su and Cai. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Medicine Dai, Ru Cao, Yiyu Su, Yiping Cai, Suiqing Comparison of 1064-nm Nd:YAG picosecond laser using fractional micro-lens array vs. ablative fractional 2940-nm Er:YAG laser for the treatment of atrophic acne scar in Asians: a 20-week prospective, randomized, split-face, controlled pilot study |
title | Comparison of 1064-nm Nd:YAG picosecond laser using fractional micro-lens array vs. ablative fractional 2940-nm Er:YAG laser for the treatment of atrophic acne scar in Asians: a 20-week prospective, randomized, split-face, controlled pilot study |
title_full | Comparison of 1064-nm Nd:YAG picosecond laser using fractional micro-lens array vs. ablative fractional 2940-nm Er:YAG laser for the treatment of atrophic acne scar in Asians: a 20-week prospective, randomized, split-face, controlled pilot study |
title_fullStr | Comparison of 1064-nm Nd:YAG picosecond laser using fractional micro-lens array vs. ablative fractional 2940-nm Er:YAG laser for the treatment of atrophic acne scar in Asians: a 20-week prospective, randomized, split-face, controlled pilot study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of 1064-nm Nd:YAG picosecond laser using fractional micro-lens array vs. ablative fractional 2940-nm Er:YAG laser for the treatment of atrophic acne scar in Asians: a 20-week prospective, randomized, split-face, controlled pilot study |
title_short | Comparison of 1064-nm Nd:YAG picosecond laser using fractional micro-lens array vs. ablative fractional 2940-nm Er:YAG laser for the treatment of atrophic acne scar in Asians: a 20-week prospective, randomized, split-face, controlled pilot study |
title_sort | comparison of 1064-nm nd:yag picosecond laser using fractional micro-lens array vs. ablative fractional 2940-nm er:yag laser for the treatment of atrophic acne scar in asians: a 20-week prospective, randomized, split-face, controlled pilot study |
topic | Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10687437/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38034535 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1248831 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dairu comparisonof1064nmndyagpicosecondlaserusingfractionalmicrolensarrayvsablativefractional2940nmeryaglaserforthetreatmentofatrophicacnescarinasiansa20weekprospectiverandomizedsplitfacecontrolledpilotstudy AT caoyiyu comparisonof1064nmndyagpicosecondlaserusingfractionalmicrolensarrayvsablativefractional2940nmeryaglaserforthetreatmentofatrophicacnescarinasiansa20weekprospectiverandomizedsplitfacecontrolledpilotstudy AT suyiping comparisonof1064nmndyagpicosecondlaserusingfractionalmicrolensarrayvsablativefractional2940nmeryaglaserforthetreatmentofatrophicacnescarinasiansa20weekprospectiverandomizedsplitfacecontrolledpilotstudy AT caisuiqing comparisonof1064nmndyagpicosecondlaserusingfractionalmicrolensarrayvsablativefractional2940nmeryaglaserforthetreatmentofatrophicacnescarinasiansa20weekprospectiverandomizedsplitfacecontrolledpilotstudy |