Cargando…

Evaluation of video review tools for assessing non-technical skills in emergency department resuscitation teams: a systematic review

BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE: Use of video review in medicine is established in contexts such as surgery. Although not widely used in the emergency department (ED), some centres use it to evaluate non-technical skills (NTS) to support teaching and quality improvement. OBJECTIVE: There is no consensus o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alexander, Emily G, Denny, Fraser, Gordon, Malcom WG, McKiernan, Cieran, Lowe, David J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10687788/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38030981
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-023-00895-7
_version_ 1785152043220992000
author Alexander, Emily G
Denny, Fraser
Gordon, Malcom WG
McKiernan, Cieran
Lowe, David J
author_facet Alexander, Emily G
Denny, Fraser
Gordon, Malcom WG
McKiernan, Cieran
Lowe, David J
author_sort Alexander, Emily G
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE: Use of video review in medicine is established in contexts such as surgery. Although not widely used in the emergency department (ED), some centres use it to evaluate non-technical skills (NTS) to support teaching and quality improvement. OBJECTIVE: There is no consensus on assessment of NTS using video review in the ED and the purpose of this review was to identify tools used in this context. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Studies were identified using Embase, Medline, CINAHL and Google Scholar. Inclusion criterion for the review was NTS of resuscitation teams working within the ED were assessed using video review. A systematic search method was used, and results were synthesised after search criteria was checked by two independent reviewers. Authors settled on the same 9 studies eligible for inclusion. OUTCOME MEASURES AND ANALYSIS: Reliability and validity of tools identified for use in this context. Due to the heterogeneity of studies, no meta-analysis occurred. MAIN RESULTS: There are 9 studies included in the review. The review was registered with PROSPERO (Ref No: CRD42022306129). Four unique tools were identified – 6 studies used T-NOTECHS, 1 used TTCA-24, 1 used CALM and 1 used the Communication tool. T-NOTECHS is validated in the literature for use in this context. CONCLUSION: T-NOTECHS is the tool of choice for assessing ED teams in this context. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12873-023-00895-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10687788
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106877882023-11-30 Evaluation of video review tools for assessing non-technical skills in emergency department resuscitation teams: a systematic review Alexander, Emily G Denny, Fraser Gordon, Malcom WG McKiernan, Cieran Lowe, David J BMC Emerg Med Research BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE: Use of video review in medicine is established in contexts such as surgery. Although not widely used in the emergency department (ED), some centres use it to evaluate non-technical skills (NTS) to support teaching and quality improvement. OBJECTIVE: There is no consensus on assessment of NTS using video review in the ED and the purpose of this review was to identify tools used in this context. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Studies were identified using Embase, Medline, CINAHL and Google Scholar. Inclusion criterion for the review was NTS of resuscitation teams working within the ED were assessed using video review. A systematic search method was used, and results were synthesised after search criteria was checked by two independent reviewers. Authors settled on the same 9 studies eligible for inclusion. OUTCOME MEASURES AND ANALYSIS: Reliability and validity of tools identified for use in this context. Due to the heterogeneity of studies, no meta-analysis occurred. MAIN RESULTS: There are 9 studies included in the review. The review was registered with PROSPERO (Ref No: CRD42022306129). Four unique tools were identified – 6 studies used T-NOTECHS, 1 used TTCA-24, 1 used CALM and 1 used the Communication tool. T-NOTECHS is validated in the literature for use in this context. CONCLUSION: T-NOTECHS is the tool of choice for assessing ED teams in this context. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12873-023-00895-7. BioMed Central 2023-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10687788/ /pubmed/38030981 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-023-00895-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Alexander, Emily G
Denny, Fraser
Gordon, Malcom WG
McKiernan, Cieran
Lowe, David J
Evaluation of video review tools for assessing non-technical skills in emergency department resuscitation teams: a systematic review
title Evaluation of video review tools for assessing non-technical skills in emergency department resuscitation teams: a systematic review
title_full Evaluation of video review tools for assessing non-technical skills in emergency department resuscitation teams: a systematic review
title_fullStr Evaluation of video review tools for assessing non-technical skills in emergency department resuscitation teams: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of video review tools for assessing non-technical skills in emergency department resuscitation teams: a systematic review
title_short Evaluation of video review tools for assessing non-technical skills in emergency department resuscitation teams: a systematic review
title_sort evaluation of video review tools for assessing non-technical skills in emergency department resuscitation teams: a systematic review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10687788/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38030981
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-023-00895-7
work_keys_str_mv AT alexanderemilyg evaluationofvideoreviewtoolsforassessingnontechnicalskillsinemergencydepartmentresuscitationteamsasystematicreview
AT dennyfraser evaluationofvideoreviewtoolsforassessingnontechnicalskillsinemergencydepartmentresuscitationteamsasystematicreview
AT gordonmalcomwg evaluationofvideoreviewtoolsforassessingnontechnicalskillsinemergencydepartmentresuscitationteamsasystematicreview
AT mckiernancieran evaluationofvideoreviewtoolsforassessingnontechnicalskillsinemergencydepartmentresuscitationteamsasystematicreview
AT lowedavidj evaluationofvideoreviewtoolsforassessingnontechnicalskillsinemergencydepartmentresuscitationteamsasystematicreview