Cargando…

Detecting isolated cognitive relapses in persons with MS

BACKGROUND: The existence of isolated cognitive relapses (ICRs) in persons with MS (PwMS) has been debated. OBJECTIVE: To examine relapses with decline on Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) but no change on Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). METHODS: This 3-year prospective cohort study ident...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morrow, Sarah A, Weinstock, Zachary L, Mirmosayyeb, Omid, Conway, Devon, Fuchs, Tom, Jaworski, Michael G, Eckert, Sveltlana, Hojnacki, David H, Dwyer, Michael G, Zivadinov, Robert, Weinstock-Guttman, Bianca, Benedict, Ralph H B
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10687840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37776097
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/13524585231201219
_version_ 1785152054794125312
author Morrow, Sarah A
Weinstock, Zachary L
Mirmosayyeb, Omid
Conway, Devon
Fuchs, Tom
Jaworski, Michael G
Eckert, Sveltlana
Hojnacki, David H
Dwyer, Michael G
Zivadinov, Robert
Weinstock-Guttman, Bianca
Benedict, Ralph H B
author_facet Morrow, Sarah A
Weinstock, Zachary L
Mirmosayyeb, Omid
Conway, Devon
Fuchs, Tom
Jaworski, Michael G
Eckert, Sveltlana
Hojnacki, David H
Dwyer, Michael G
Zivadinov, Robert
Weinstock-Guttman, Bianca
Benedict, Ralph H B
author_sort Morrow, Sarah A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The existence of isolated cognitive relapses (ICRs) in persons with MS (PwMS) has been debated. OBJECTIVE: To examine relapses with decline on Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) but no change on Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). METHODS: This 3-year prospective cohort study identified PwMS experiencing a relapse with decrease on SDMT. Participants with SDMT decline/stable EDSS were labeled “ICR,” while those with a corresponding decrease on EDSS were classified “Relapse with Cognitive Decline (RCD).” Two definitions of SDMT decline were explored: (1) ⩾ 8 points, and (2) ⩾ 4 points. Logistic regression was used to analyze the relationship between ICR and RCD. RESULTS: The full cohort had 592 participants: 83 experienced relapses; 22 (26.5%) had an SDMT decrease of ⩾ 8 points; 14 (63.6%) met ICR criteria. Logistic regression (X(2)(1) = 5.112, p = 0.024) using demographics and disease characteristics explained 28.4% of the variance in ICR versus RCD. Only the MS Neuropsychological Questionnaire was associated with ICR (odds ratio (OR): 8.6; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.1–16.4) 40 relapsing participants with SDMT decrease of ⩾ 4 points were identified: 26 (65%) had a stable EDSS (ICR). Logistic regression did not find any variable predictive of ICR. CONCLUSION: This prospective study demonstrates evidence of ICR in PwMS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10687840
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106878402023-12-01 Detecting isolated cognitive relapses in persons with MS Morrow, Sarah A Weinstock, Zachary L Mirmosayyeb, Omid Conway, Devon Fuchs, Tom Jaworski, Michael G Eckert, Sveltlana Hojnacki, David H Dwyer, Michael G Zivadinov, Robert Weinstock-Guttman, Bianca Benedict, Ralph H B Mult Scler Original Research Papers BACKGROUND: The existence of isolated cognitive relapses (ICRs) in persons with MS (PwMS) has been debated. OBJECTIVE: To examine relapses with decline on Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) but no change on Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). METHODS: This 3-year prospective cohort study identified PwMS experiencing a relapse with decrease on SDMT. Participants with SDMT decline/stable EDSS were labeled “ICR,” while those with a corresponding decrease on EDSS were classified “Relapse with Cognitive Decline (RCD).” Two definitions of SDMT decline were explored: (1) ⩾ 8 points, and (2) ⩾ 4 points. Logistic regression was used to analyze the relationship between ICR and RCD. RESULTS: The full cohort had 592 participants: 83 experienced relapses; 22 (26.5%) had an SDMT decrease of ⩾ 8 points; 14 (63.6%) met ICR criteria. Logistic regression (X(2)(1) = 5.112, p = 0.024) using demographics and disease characteristics explained 28.4% of the variance in ICR versus RCD. Only the MS Neuropsychological Questionnaire was associated with ICR (odds ratio (OR): 8.6; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.1–16.4) 40 relapsing participants with SDMT decrease of ⩾ 4 points were identified: 26 (65%) had a stable EDSS (ICR). Logistic regression did not find any variable predictive of ICR. CONCLUSION: This prospective study demonstrates evidence of ICR in PwMS. SAGE Publications 2023-09-30 2023-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10687840/ /pubmed/37776097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/13524585231201219 Text en © The Author(s), 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research Papers
Morrow, Sarah A
Weinstock, Zachary L
Mirmosayyeb, Omid
Conway, Devon
Fuchs, Tom
Jaworski, Michael G
Eckert, Sveltlana
Hojnacki, David H
Dwyer, Michael G
Zivadinov, Robert
Weinstock-Guttman, Bianca
Benedict, Ralph H B
Detecting isolated cognitive relapses in persons with MS
title Detecting isolated cognitive relapses in persons with MS
title_full Detecting isolated cognitive relapses in persons with MS
title_fullStr Detecting isolated cognitive relapses in persons with MS
title_full_unstemmed Detecting isolated cognitive relapses in persons with MS
title_short Detecting isolated cognitive relapses in persons with MS
title_sort detecting isolated cognitive relapses in persons with ms
topic Original Research Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10687840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37776097
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/13524585231201219
work_keys_str_mv AT morrowsaraha detectingisolatedcognitiverelapsesinpersonswithms
AT weinstockzacharyl detectingisolatedcognitiverelapsesinpersonswithms
AT mirmosayyebomid detectingisolatedcognitiverelapsesinpersonswithms
AT conwaydevon detectingisolatedcognitiverelapsesinpersonswithms
AT fuchstom detectingisolatedcognitiverelapsesinpersonswithms
AT jaworskimichaelg detectingisolatedcognitiverelapsesinpersonswithms
AT eckertsveltlana detectingisolatedcognitiverelapsesinpersonswithms
AT hojnackidavidh detectingisolatedcognitiverelapsesinpersonswithms
AT dwyermichaelg detectingisolatedcognitiverelapsesinpersonswithms
AT zivadinovrobert detectingisolatedcognitiverelapsesinpersonswithms
AT weinstockguttmanbianca detectingisolatedcognitiverelapsesinpersonswithms
AT benedictralphhb detectingisolatedcognitiverelapsesinpersonswithms