Cargando…

Individual-level patterns of resource selection do not predict hotspots of contact

Contact among animals is crucial for various ecological processes, including social behaviors, disease transmission, and predator–prey interactions. However, the distribution of contact events across time and space is heterogeneous, influenced by environmental factors and biological purposes. Previo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Anni, Boughton, Raoul, Miller, Ryan S., Snow, Nathan P., Vercauteren, Kurt C., Pepin, Kim M., Wittemyer, George
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10687890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38037089
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40462-023-00435-9
_version_ 1785152065770618880
author Yang, Anni
Boughton, Raoul
Miller, Ryan S.
Snow, Nathan P.
Vercauteren, Kurt C.
Pepin, Kim M.
Wittemyer, George
author_facet Yang, Anni
Boughton, Raoul
Miller, Ryan S.
Snow, Nathan P.
Vercauteren, Kurt C.
Pepin, Kim M.
Wittemyer, George
author_sort Yang, Anni
collection PubMed
description Contact among animals is crucial for various ecological processes, including social behaviors, disease transmission, and predator–prey interactions. However, the distribution of contact events across time and space is heterogeneous, influenced by environmental factors and biological purposes. Previous studies have assumed that areas with abundant resources and preferred habitats attract more individuals and, therefore, lead to more contact. To examine the accuracy of this assumption, we used a use-available framework to compare landscape factors influencing the location of contacts between wild pigs (Sus scrofa) in two study areas in Florida and Texas (USA) from those influencing non-contact space use. We employed a contact-resource selection function (RSF) model, where contact locations were defined as used points and locations without contact as available points. By comparing outputs from this contact RSF with a general, population-level RSF, we assessed the factors driving both habitat selection and contact. We found that the landscape predictors (e.g., wetland, linear features, and food resources) played different roles in habitat selection from contact processes for wild pigs in both study areas. This indicated that pigs interacted with their landscapes differently when choosing habitats compared to when they encountered other individuals. Consequently, relying solely on the spatial overlap of individual or population-level RSF models may lead to a misleading understanding of contact-related ecology. Our findings challenge prevailing assumptions about contact and introduce innovative approaches to better understand the ecological drivers of spatially explicit contact. By accurately predicting the spatial distribution of contact events, we can enhance our understanding of contact based ecological processes and their spatial dynamics. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40462-023-00435-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10687890
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106878902023-11-30 Individual-level patterns of resource selection do not predict hotspots of contact Yang, Anni Boughton, Raoul Miller, Ryan S. Snow, Nathan P. Vercauteren, Kurt C. Pepin, Kim M. Wittemyer, George Mov Ecol Research Contact among animals is crucial for various ecological processes, including social behaviors, disease transmission, and predator–prey interactions. However, the distribution of contact events across time and space is heterogeneous, influenced by environmental factors and biological purposes. Previous studies have assumed that areas with abundant resources and preferred habitats attract more individuals and, therefore, lead to more contact. To examine the accuracy of this assumption, we used a use-available framework to compare landscape factors influencing the location of contacts between wild pigs (Sus scrofa) in two study areas in Florida and Texas (USA) from those influencing non-contact space use. We employed a contact-resource selection function (RSF) model, where contact locations were defined as used points and locations without contact as available points. By comparing outputs from this contact RSF with a general, population-level RSF, we assessed the factors driving both habitat selection and contact. We found that the landscape predictors (e.g., wetland, linear features, and food resources) played different roles in habitat selection from contact processes for wild pigs in both study areas. This indicated that pigs interacted with their landscapes differently when choosing habitats compared to when they encountered other individuals. Consequently, relying solely on the spatial overlap of individual or population-level RSF models may lead to a misleading understanding of contact-related ecology. Our findings challenge prevailing assumptions about contact and introduce innovative approaches to better understand the ecological drivers of spatially explicit contact. By accurately predicting the spatial distribution of contact events, we can enhance our understanding of contact based ecological processes and their spatial dynamics. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40462-023-00435-9. BioMed Central 2023-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10687890/ /pubmed/38037089 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40462-023-00435-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Yang, Anni
Boughton, Raoul
Miller, Ryan S.
Snow, Nathan P.
Vercauteren, Kurt C.
Pepin, Kim M.
Wittemyer, George
Individual-level patterns of resource selection do not predict hotspots of contact
title Individual-level patterns of resource selection do not predict hotspots of contact
title_full Individual-level patterns of resource selection do not predict hotspots of contact
title_fullStr Individual-level patterns of resource selection do not predict hotspots of contact
title_full_unstemmed Individual-level patterns of resource selection do not predict hotspots of contact
title_short Individual-level patterns of resource selection do not predict hotspots of contact
title_sort individual-level patterns of resource selection do not predict hotspots of contact
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10687890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38037089
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40462-023-00435-9
work_keys_str_mv AT yanganni individuallevelpatternsofresourceselectiondonotpredicthotspotsofcontact
AT boughtonraoul individuallevelpatternsofresourceselectiondonotpredicthotspotsofcontact
AT millerryans individuallevelpatternsofresourceselectiondonotpredicthotspotsofcontact
AT snownathanp individuallevelpatternsofresourceselectiondonotpredicthotspotsofcontact
AT vercauterenkurtc individuallevelpatternsofresourceselectiondonotpredicthotspotsofcontact
AT pepinkimm individuallevelpatternsofresourceselectiondonotpredicthotspotsofcontact
AT wittemyergeorge individuallevelpatternsofresourceselectiondonotpredicthotspotsofcontact