Cargando…
Occupational exposure to respirable crystalline silica and lung cancer: a systematic review of cut-off points
BACKGROUND: Respirable crystalline silica (RCS) is associated with the development of lung cancer. However, there is uncertainty around the exposure threshold at which exposure to RCS may pose a clear risk for the development of lung cancer. The objective of this study was to review the cut-off poin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10687911/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38031062 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12940-023-01036-0 |
_version_ | 1785152070713606144 |
---|---|
author | Rey-Brandariz, Julia Martínez, Cristina Candal-Pedreira, Cristina Pérez-Ríos, Mónica Varela-Lema, Leonor Ruano-Ravina, Alberto |
author_facet | Rey-Brandariz, Julia Martínez, Cristina Candal-Pedreira, Cristina Pérez-Ríos, Mónica Varela-Lema, Leonor Ruano-Ravina, Alberto |
author_sort | Rey-Brandariz, Julia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Respirable crystalline silica (RCS) is associated with the development of lung cancer. However, there is uncertainty around the exposure threshold at which exposure to RCS may pose a clear risk for the development of lung cancer. The objective of this study was to review the cut-off points at which the risk of mortality or incidence of lung cancer due to occupational exposure to RCS becomes evident through a systematic review. METHODS: We conducted a search in PubMed, including cohort and case-control studies which assessed various categories of RCS exposure. A search was also conducted on the webpages of institutional organizations. A qualitative data synthesis was performed. RESULTS: Twenty studies were included. Studies that assessed lung cancer mortality and incidence displayed wide variability both in RCS exposure categories and related risks. Although most studies found no significant association for RCS exposure categories, it appears to be a low risk of lung cancer for mean concentrations of less than 0.07mg/m(3). Regulatory agencies set annual RCS exposure limits ranging from 0.025mg/m(3) through 0.1mg/m(3). CONCLUSIONS: There is a wide degree of heterogeneity in RCS exposure categories, with most studies observing no significant risk of lung cancer for the lowest exposure categories. Cut-off points differ between agencies but are nonetheless very similar and do not exceed 0.1mg/m(3). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12940-023-01036-0. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10687911 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106879112023-11-30 Occupational exposure to respirable crystalline silica and lung cancer: a systematic review of cut-off points Rey-Brandariz, Julia Martínez, Cristina Candal-Pedreira, Cristina Pérez-Ríos, Mónica Varela-Lema, Leonor Ruano-Ravina, Alberto Environ Health Review BACKGROUND: Respirable crystalline silica (RCS) is associated with the development of lung cancer. However, there is uncertainty around the exposure threshold at which exposure to RCS may pose a clear risk for the development of lung cancer. The objective of this study was to review the cut-off points at which the risk of mortality or incidence of lung cancer due to occupational exposure to RCS becomes evident through a systematic review. METHODS: We conducted a search in PubMed, including cohort and case-control studies which assessed various categories of RCS exposure. A search was also conducted on the webpages of institutional organizations. A qualitative data synthesis was performed. RESULTS: Twenty studies were included. Studies that assessed lung cancer mortality and incidence displayed wide variability both in RCS exposure categories and related risks. Although most studies found no significant association for RCS exposure categories, it appears to be a low risk of lung cancer for mean concentrations of less than 0.07mg/m(3). Regulatory agencies set annual RCS exposure limits ranging from 0.025mg/m(3) through 0.1mg/m(3). CONCLUSIONS: There is a wide degree of heterogeneity in RCS exposure categories, with most studies observing no significant risk of lung cancer for the lowest exposure categories. Cut-off points differ between agencies but are nonetheless very similar and do not exceed 0.1mg/m(3). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12940-023-01036-0. BioMed Central 2023-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10687911/ /pubmed/38031062 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12940-023-01036-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Review Rey-Brandariz, Julia Martínez, Cristina Candal-Pedreira, Cristina Pérez-Ríos, Mónica Varela-Lema, Leonor Ruano-Ravina, Alberto Occupational exposure to respirable crystalline silica and lung cancer: a systematic review of cut-off points |
title | Occupational exposure to respirable crystalline silica and lung cancer: a systematic review of cut-off points |
title_full | Occupational exposure to respirable crystalline silica and lung cancer: a systematic review of cut-off points |
title_fullStr | Occupational exposure to respirable crystalline silica and lung cancer: a systematic review of cut-off points |
title_full_unstemmed | Occupational exposure to respirable crystalline silica and lung cancer: a systematic review of cut-off points |
title_short | Occupational exposure to respirable crystalline silica and lung cancer: a systematic review of cut-off points |
title_sort | occupational exposure to respirable crystalline silica and lung cancer: a systematic review of cut-off points |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10687911/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38031062 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12940-023-01036-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT reybrandarizjulia occupationalexposuretorespirablecrystallinesilicaandlungcancerasystematicreviewofcutoffpoints AT martinezcristina occupationalexposuretorespirablecrystallinesilicaandlungcancerasystematicreviewofcutoffpoints AT candalpedreiracristina occupationalexposuretorespirablecrystallinesilicaandlungcancerasystematicreviewofcutoffpoints AT perezriosmonica occupationalexposuretorespirablecrystallinesilicaandlungcancerasystematicreviewofcutoffpoints AT varelalemaleonor occupationalexposuretorespirablecrystallinesilicaandlungcancerasystematicreviewofcutoffpoints AT ruanoravinaalberto occupationalexposuretorespirablecrystallinesilicaandlungcancerasystematicreviewofcutoffpoints |