Cargando…

Occupational exposure to respirable crystalline silica and lung cancer: a systematic review of cut-off points

BACKGROUND: Respirable crystalline silica (RCS) is associated with the development of lung cancer. However, there is uncertainty around the exposure threshold at which exposure to RCS may pose a clear risk for the development of lung cancer. The objective of this study was to review the cut-off poin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rey-Brandariz, Julia, Martínez, Cristina, Candal-Pedreira, Cristina, Pérez-Ríos, Mónica, Varela-Lema, Leonor, Ruano-Ravina, Alberto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10687911/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38031062
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12940-023-01036-0
_version_ 1785152070713606144
author Rey-Brandariz, Julia
Martínez, Cristina
Candal-Pedreira, Cristina
Pérez-Ríos, Mónica
Varela-Lema, Leonor
Ruano-Ravina, Alberto
author_facet Rey-Brandariz, Julia
Martínez, Cristina
Candal-Pedreira, Cristina
Pérez-Ríos, Mónica
Varela-Lema, Leonor
Ruano-Ravina, Alberto
author_sort Rey-Brandariz, Julia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Respirable crystalline silica (RCS) is associated with the development of lung cancer. However, there is uncertainty around the exposure threshold at which exposure to RCS may pose a clear risk for the development of lung cancer. The objective of this study was to review the cut-off points at which the risk of mortality or incidence of lung cancer due to occupational exposure to RCS becomes evident through a systematic review. METHODS: We conducted a search in PubMed, including cohort and case-control studies which assessed various categories of RCS exposure. A search was also conducted on the webpages of institutional organizations. A qualitative data synthesis was performed. RESULTS: Twenty studies were included. Studies that assessed lung cancer mortality and incidence displayed wide variability both in RCS exposure categories and related risks. Although most studies found no significant association for RCS exposure categories, it appears to be a low risk of lung cancer for mean concentrations of less than 0.07mg/m(3). Regulatory agencies set annual RCS exposure limits ranging from 0.025mg/m(3) through 0.1mg/m(3). CONCLUSIONS: There is a wide degree of heterogeneity in RCS exposure categories, with most studies observing no significant risk of lung cancer for the lowest exposure categories. Cut-off points differ between agencies but are nonetheless very similar and do not exceed 0.1mg/m(3). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12940-023-01036-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10687911
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106879112023-11-30 Occupational exposure to respirable crystalline silica and lung cancer: a systematic review of cut-off points Rey-Brandariz, Julia Martínez, Cristina Candal-Pedreira, Cristina Pérez-Ríos, Mónica Varela-Lema, Leonor Ruano-Ravina, Alberto Environ Health Review BACKGROUND: Respirable crystalline silica (RCS) is associated with the development of lung cancer. However, there is uncertainty around the exposure threshold at which exposure to RCS may pose a clear risk for the development of lung cancer. The objective of this study was to review the cut-off points at which the risk of mortality or incidence of lung cancer due to occupational exposure to RCS becomes evident through a systematic review. METHODS: We conducted a search in PubMed, including cohort and case-control studies which assessed various categories of RCS exposure. A search was also conducted on the webpages of institutional organizations. A qualitative data synthesis was performed. RESULTS: Twenty studies were included. Studies that assessed lung cancer mortality and incidence displayed wide variability both in RCS exposure categories and related risks. Although most studies found no significant association for RCS exposure categories, it appears to be a low risk of lung cancer for mean concentrations of less than 0.07mg/m(3). Regulatory agencies set annual RCS exposure limits ranging from 0.025mg/m(3) through 0.1mg/m(3). CONCLUSIONS: There is a wide degree of heterogeneity in RCS exposure categories, with most studies observing no significant risk of lung cancer for the lowest exposure categories. Cut-off points differ between agencies but are nonetheless very similar and do not exceed 0.1mg/m(3). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12940-023-01036-0. BioMed Central 2023-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10687911/ /pubmed/38031062 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12940-023-01036-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Rey-Brandariz, Julia
Martínez, Cristina
Candal-Pedreira, Cristina
Pérez-Ríos, Mónica
Varela-Lema, Leonor
Ruano-Ravina, Alberto
Occupational exposure to respirable crystalline silica and lung cancer: a systematic review of cut-off points
title Occupational exposure to respirable crystalline silica and lung cancer: a systematic review of cut-off points
title_full Occupational exposure to respirable crystalline silica and lung cancer: a systematic review of cut-off points
title_fullStr Occupational exposure to respirable crystalline silica and lung cancer: a systematic review of cut-off points
title_full_unstemmed Occupational exposure to respirable crystalline silica and lung cancer: a systematic review of cut-off points
title_short Occupational exposure to respirable crystalline silica and lung cancer: a systematic review of cut-off points
title_sort occupational exposure to respirable crystalline silica and lung cancer: a systematic review of cut-off points
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10687911/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38031062
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12940-023-01036-0
work_keys_str_mv AT reybrandarizjulia occupationalexposuretorespirablecrystallinesilicaandlungcancerasystematicreviewofcutoffpoints
AT martinezcristina occupationalexposuretorespirablecrystallinesilicaandlungcancerasystematicreviewofcutoffpoints
AT candalpedreiracristina occupationalexposuretorespirablecrystallinesilicaandlungcancerasystematicreviewofcutoffpoints
AT perezriosmonica occupationalexposuretorespirablecrystallinesilicaandlungcancerasystematicreviewofcutoffpoints
AT varelalemaleonor occupationalexposuretorespirablecrystallinesilicaandlungcancerasystematicreviewofcutoffpoints
AT ruanoravinaalberto occupationalexposuretorespirablecrystallinesilicaandlungcancerasystematicreviewofcutoffpoints