Cargando…

Is moderate resistance training adequate for older adults with sarcopenia? A systematic review and network meta-analysis of RCTs

BACKGROUND: Resistance training (RT) and nutritional supplementation are recommended for the management of sarcopenia in older adults. However, optimal RT intensity for the treatment of sarcopenia has not been well investigated. METHODS: This network meta-analysis aims to determine the comparative e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Yu Chang, Chen, Wang-Chun, Liu, Chia-Wei, Huang, Wei-Yu, Lu, ICheng, Lin, Chi Wei, Huang, Ru Yi, Chen, Jung Sheng, Huang, Chi Hsien
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10687931/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38030985
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s11556-023-00333-4
_version_ 1785152075455266816
author Chen, Yu Chang
Chen, Wang-Chun
Liu, Chia-Wei
Huang, Wei-Yu
Lu, ICheng
Lin, Chi Wei
Huang, Ru Yi
Chen, Jung Sheng
Huang, Chi Hsien
author_facet Chen, Yu Chang
Chen, Wang-Chun
Liu, Chia-Wei
Huang, Wei-Yu
Lu, ICheng
Lin, Chi Wei
Huang, Ru Yi
Chen, Jung Sheng
Huang, Chi Hsien
author_sort Chen, Yu Chang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Resistance training (RT) and nutritional supplementation are recommended for the management of sarcopenia in older adults. However, optimal RT intensity for the treatment of sarcopenia has not been well investigated. METHODS: This network meta-analysis aims to determine the comparative effectiveness of interventions for sarcopenia, taking RT intensity into consideration. RT intensity was classified into light-to-moderate intensity RT(LMRT), moderate intensity RT(MRT), and moderate-to-vigorous intensity RT(MVRT) based on percentage of one repetition maximum (%1RM) and/or rating of perceived exertion. RESULTS: A total of 50 RCTs (N = 4,085) were included after screening 3,485 articles. The results confirmed that RT with or without nutrition was positively associated with improved measures of muscle strength and physical performance. Regarding RT intensity, LMRT only demonstrated positive effects on hand grip (aerobic training + LMRT + nutrition: mean difference [MD] = 2.88; 95% credential intervals [CrI] = 0.43,5.32). MRT provided benefits on improvement in the 30-s chair stand test (repetitions) (MRT: MD = 2.98, 95% CrI = 0.35,5.59), timed up and go test (MRT: MD = -1.74, 95% CrI: = -3.34,-0.56), hand grip (MRT: MD = 2.44; 95% CrI = 0.03,5.70), and leg press (MRT: MD = 8.36; 95% CrI = 1.87,13.4). MVRT also improved chair stand test repetitions (MVRT: MD = 5.64, 95% CrI = 0.14,11.4), gait speed (MVRT + nutrition: MD = 0.21, 95% CrI = 0.003,0.48), appendicular skeletal muscle index (MVRT + nutrition: MD = 0.25, 95% CrI = 0.01,0.5), and leg press (MVRT: MD = 14.7, 95% CrI: 5.96,22.4; MVRT + nutrition: MD = 17.8, 95% CrI: 7.55,28.6). CONCLUSION: MVRT had greater benefits on muscle mass, lower extremity strength, and physical performance compared to MRT. Increasing RT intensity may be recommended for sarcopenic older adults. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s11556-023-00333-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10687931
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106879312023-11-30 Is moderate resistance training adequate for older adults with sarcopenia? A systematic review and network meta-analysis of RCTs Chen, Yu Chang Chen, Wang-Chun Liu, Chia-Wei Huang, Wei-Yu Lu, ICheng Lin, Chi Wei Huang, Ru Yi Chen, Jung Sheng Huang, Chi Hsien Eur Rev Aging Phys Act Review Article BACKGROUND: Resistance training (RT) and nutritional supplementation are recommended for the management of sarcopenia in older adults. However, optimal RT intensity for the treatment of sarcopenia has not been well investigated. METHODS: This network meta-analysis aims to determine the comparative effectiveness of interventions for sarcopenia, taking RT intensity into consideration. RT intensity was classified into light-to-moderate intensity RT(LMRT), moderate intensity RT(MRT), and moderate-to-vigorous intensity RT(MVRT) based on percentage of one repetition maximum (%1RM) and/or rating of perceived exertion. RESULTS: A total of 50 RCTs (N = 4,085) were included after screening 3,485 articles. The results confirmed that RT with or without nutrition was positively associated with improved measures of muscle strength and physical performance. Regarding RT intensity, LMRT only demonstrated positive effects on hand grip (aerobic training + LMRT + nutrition: mean difference [MD] = 2.88; 95% credential intervals [CrI] = 0.43,5.32). MRT provided benefits on improvement in the 30-s chair stand test (repetitions) (MRT: MD = 2.98, 95% CrI = 0.35,5.59), timed up and go test (MRT: MD = -1.74, 95% CrI: = -3.34,-0.56), hand grip (MRT: MD = 2.44; 95% CrI = 0.03,5.70), and leg press (MRT: MD = 8.36; 95% CrI = 1.87,13.4). MVRT also improved chair stand test repetitions (MVRT: MD = 5.64, 95% CrI = 0.14,11.4), gait speed (MVRT + nutrition: MD = 0.21, 95% CrI = 0.003,0.48), appendicular skeletal muscle index (MVRT + nutrition: MD = 0.25, 95% CrI = 0.01,0.5), and leg press (MVRT: MD = 14.7, 95% CrI: 5.96,22.4; MVRT + nutrition: MD = 17.8, 95% CrI: 7.55,28.6). CONCLUSION: MVRT had greater benefits on muscle mass, lower extremity strength, and physical performance compared to MRT. Increasing RT intensity may be recommended for sarcopenic older adults. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s11556-023-00333-4. BioMed Central 2023-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10687931/ /pubmed/38030985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s11556-023-00333-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review Article
Chen, Yu Chang
Chen, Wang-Chun
Liu, Chia-Wei
Huang, Wei-Yu
Lu, ICheng
Lin, Chi Wei
Huang, Ru Yi
Chen, Jung Sheng
Huang, Chi Hsien
Is moderate resistance training adequate for older adults with sarcopenia? A systematic review and network meta-analysis of RCTs
title Is moderate resistance training adequate for older adults with sarcopenia? A systematic review and network meta-analysis of RCTs
title_full Is moderate resistance training adequate for older adults with sarcopenia? A systematic review and network meta-analysis of RCTs
title_fullStr Is moderate resistance training adequate for older adults with sarcopenia? A systematic review and network meta-analysis of RCTs
title_full_unstemmed Is moderate resistance training adequate for older adults with sarcopenia? A systematic review and network meta-analysis of RCTs
title_short Is moderate resistance training adequate for older adults with sarcopenia? A systematic review and network meta-analysis of RCTs
title_sort is moderate resistance training adequate for older adults with sarcopenia? a systematic review and network meta-analysis of rcts
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10687931/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38030985
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s11556-023-00333-4
work_keys_str_mv AT chenyuchang ismoderateresistancetrainingadequateforolderadultswithsarcopeniaasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrcts
AT chenwangchun ismoderateresistancetrainingadequateforolderadultswithsarcopeniaasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrcts
AT liuchiawei ismoderateresistancetrainingadequateforolderadultswithsarcopeniaasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrcts
AT huangweiyu ismoderateresistancetrainingadequateforolderadultswithsarcopeniaasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrcts
AT luicheng ismoderateresistancetrainingadequateforolderadultswithsarcopeniaasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrcts
AT linchiwei ismoderateresistancetrainingadequateforolderadultswithsarcopeniaasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrcts
AT huangruyi ismoderateresistancetrainingadequateforolderadultswithsarcopeniaasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrcts
AT chenjungsheng ismoderateresistancetrainingadequateforolderadultswithsarcopeniaasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrcts
AT huangchihsien ismoderateresistancetrainingadequateforolderadultswithsarcopeniaasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrcts