Cargando…
Is moderate resistance training adequate for older adults with sarcopenia? A systematic review and network meta-analysis of RCTs
BACKGROUND: Resistance training (RT) and nutritional supplementation are recommended for the management of sarcopenia in older adults. However, optimal RT intensity for the treatment of sarcopenia has not been well investigated. METHODS: This network meta-analysis aims to determine the comparative e...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10687931/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38030985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s11556-023-00333-4 |
_version_ | 1785152075455266816 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Yu Chang Chen, Wang-Chun Liu, Chia-Wei Huang, Wei-Yu Lu, ICheng Lin, Chi Wei Huang, Ru Yi Chen, Jung Sheng Huang, Chi Hsien |
author_facet | Chen, Yu Chang Chen, Wang-Chun Liu, Chia-Wei Huang, Wei-Yu Lu, ICheng Lin, Chi Wei Huang, Ru Yi Chen, Jung Sheng Huang, Chi Hsien |
author_sort | Chen, Yu Chang |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Resistance training (RT) and nutritional supplementation are recommended for the management of sarcopenia in older adults. However, optimal RT intensity for the treatment of sarcopenia has not been well investigated. METHODS: This network meta-analysis aims to determine the comparative effectiveness of interventions for sarcopenia, taking RT intensity into consideration. RT intensity was classified into light-to-moderate intensity RT(LMRT), moderate intensity RT(MRT), and moderate-to-vigorous intensity RT(MVRT) based on percentage of one repetition maximum (%1RM) and/or rating of perceived exertion. RESULTS: A total of 50 RCTs (N = 4,085) were included after screening 3,485 articles. The results confirmed that RT with or without nutrition was positively associated with improved measures of muscle strength and physical performance. Regarding RT intensity, LMRT only demonstrated positive effects on hand grip (aerobic training + LMRT + nutrition: mean difference [MD] = 2.88; 95% credential intervals [CrI] = 0.43,5.32). MRT provided benefits on improvement in the 30-s chair stand test (repetitions) (MRT: MD = 2.98, 95% CrI = 0.35,5.59), timed up and go test (MRT: MD = -1.74, 95% CrI: = -3.34,-0.56), hand grip (MRT: MD = 2.44; 95% CrI = 0.03,5.70), and leg press (MRT: MD = 8.36; 95% CrI = 1.87,13.4). MVRT also improved chair stand test repetitions (MVRT: MD = 5.64, 95% CrI = 0.14,11.4), gait speed (MVRT + nutrition: MD = 0.21, 95% CrI = 0.003,0.48), appendicular skeletal muscle index (MVRT + nutrition: MD = 0.25, 95% CrI = 0.01,0.5), and leg press (MVRT: MD = 14.7, 95% CrI: 5.96,22.4; MVRT + nutrition: MD = 17.8, 95% CrI: 7.55,28.6). CONCLUSION: MVRT had greater benefits on muscle mass, lower extremity strength, and physical performance compared to MRT. Increasing RT intensity may be recommended for sarcopenic older adults. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s11556-023-00333-4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10687931 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106879312023-11-30 Is moderate resistance training adequate for older adults with sarcopenia? A systematic review and network meta-analysis of RCTs Chen, Yu Chang Chen, Wang-Chun Liu, Chia-Wei Huang, Wei-Yu Lu, ICheng Lin, Chi Wei Huang, Ru Yi Chen, Jung Sheng Huang, Chi Hsien Eur Rev Aging Phys Act Review Article BACKGROUND: Resistance training (RT) and nutritional supplementation are recommended for the management of sarcopenia in older adults. However, optimal RT intensity for the treatment of sarcopenia has not been well investigated. METHODS: This network meta-analysis aims to determine the comparative effectiveness of interventions for sarcopenia, taking RT intensity into consideration. RT intensity was classified into light-to-moderate intensity RT(LMRT), moderate intensity RT(MRT), and moderate-to-vigorous intensity RT(MVRT) based on percentage of one repetition maximum (%1RM) and/or rating of perceived exertion. RESULTS: A total of 50 RCTs (N = 4,085) were included after screening 3,485 articles. The results confirmed that RT with or without nutrition was positively associated with improved measures of muscle strength and physical performance. Regarding RT intensity, LMRT only demonstrated positive effects on hand grip (aerobic training + LMRT + nutrition: mean difference [MD] = 2.88; 95% credential intervals [CrI] = 0.43,5.32). MRT provided benefits on improvement in the 30-s chair stand test (repetitions) (MRT: MD = 2.98, 95% CrI = 0.35,5.59), timed up and go test (MRT: MD = -1.74, 95% CrI: = -3.34,-0.56), hand grip (MRT: MD = 2.44; 95% CrI = 0.03,5.70), and leg press (MRT: MD = 8.36; 95% CrI = 1.87,13.4). MVRT also improved chair stand test repetitions (MVRT: MD = 5.64, 95% CrI = 0.14,11.4), gait speed (MVRT + nutrition: MD = 0.21, 95% CrI = 0.003,0.48), appendicular skeletal muscle index (MVRT + nutrition: MD = 0.25, 95% CrI = 0.01,0.5), and leg press (MVRT: MD = 14.7, 95% CrI: 5.96,22.4; MVRT + nutrition: MD = 17.8, 95% CrI: 7.55,28.6). CONCLUSION: MVRT had greater benefits on muscle mass, lower extremity strength, and physical performance compared to MRT. Increasing RT intensity may be recommended for sarcopenic older adults. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s11556-023-00333-4. BioMed Central 2023-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10687931/ /pubmed/38030985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s11556-023-00333-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Chen, Yu Chang Chen, Wang-Chun Liu, Chia-Wei Huang, Wei-Yu Lu, ICheng Lin, Chi Wei Huang, Ru Yi Chen, Jung Sheng Huang, Chi Hsien Is moderate resistance training adequate for older adults with sarcopenia? A systematic review and network meta-analysis of RCTs |
title | Is moderate resistance training adequate for older adults with sarcopenia? A systematic review and network meta-analysis of RCTs |
title_full | Is moderate resistance training adequate for older adults with sarcopenia? A systematic review and network meta-analysis of RCTs |
title_fullStr | Is moderate resistance training adequate for older adults with sarcopenia? A systematic review and network meta-analysis of RCTs |
title_full_unstemmed | Is moderate resistance training adequate for older adults with sarcopenia? A systematic review and network meta-analysis of RCTs |
title_short | Is moderate resistance training adequate for older adults with sarcopenia? A systematic review and network meta-analysis of RCTs |
title_sort | is moderate resistance training adequate for older adults with sarcopenia? a systematic review and network meta-analysis of rcts |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10687931/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38030985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s11556-023-00333-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenyuchang ismoderateresistancetrainingadequateforolderadultswithsarcopeniaasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrcts AT chenwangchun ismoderateresistancetrainingadequateforolderadultswithsarcopeniaasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrcts AT liuchiawei ismoderateresistancetrainingadequateforolderadultswithsarcopeniaasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrcts AT huangweiyu ismoderateresistancetrainingadequateforolderadultswithsarcopeniaasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrcts AT luicheng ismoderateresistancetrainingadequateforolderadultswithsarcopeniaasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrcts AT linchiwei ismoderateresistancetrainingadequateforolderadultswithsarcopeniaasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrcts AT huangruyi ismoderateresistancetrainingadequateforolderadultswithsarcopeniaasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrcts AT chenjungsheng ismoderateresistancetrainingadequateforolderadultswithsarcopeniaasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrcts AT huangchihsien ismoderateresistancetrainingadequateforolderadultswithsarcopeniaasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrcts |