Cargando…

Implementing PCR testing in general practice—a qualitative study using normalization process theory

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic brought attention to a need for rapid testing of large populations. Experiences from community-based testing settings show that there can be workload difficulties, logistical challenges and socioeconomic downsides to large scale Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) testi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shahrzad, Sinead, Balasubramaniam, Kirubakaran, Kousgaard, Marius Brostrøm, Thilsing, Trine, Søndergaard, Jens, Overbeck, Gritt
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10687998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38037044
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-10355-4
_version_ 1785152090566295552
author Shahrzad, Sinead
Balasubramaniam, Kirubakaran
Kousgaard, Marius Brostrøm
Thilsing, Trine
Søndergaard, Jens
Overbeck, Gritt
author_facet Shahrzad, Sinead
Balasubramaniam, Kirubakaran
Kousgaard, Marius Brostrøm
Thilsing, Trine
Søndergaard, Jens
Overbeck, Gritt
author_sort Shahrzad, Sinead
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic brought attention to a need for rapid testing of large populations. Experiences from community-based testing settings show that there can be workload difficulties, logistical challenges and socioeconomic downsides to large scale Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) testing. Alternative testing arenas have therefore been considered. Rapid point-of-care (POC) PCR test methods have since been developed and could have potential to surveille viral respiratory infections. It is, however, unknown if PCR testing can be successfully implemented routinely in general practice. The aim of this study was to assess factors that enable and inhibit the implementation of point-of-care PCR testing for acute respiratory tract infection in general practice. METHODS: Fourteen general practices in the east Zealand area in Denmark were included in the study and given access to POC PCR testing equipment during a flu season. The participating clinics were initially trained in the use of a POC PCR testing device and then spent 6 weeks testing it. We conducted qualitative interviews with general practitioners (GPs) and their staff, before and after the testing period, specifically focusing on their clinical decision-making and internal collaboration in relation to POC PCR testing. We used normalization process theory to design the interview guides and to analyze the data. RESULTS: Professionals reported no clinical need for a POC PCR testing device in a non-pandemic clinical setting. Results were delivered faster, but this was only timesaving for the patient and not the GP, who had to perform more tasks. CONCLUSION: In its current form, the added diagnostic value of using POC PCR testing in general practice was not sufficient for the professionals to justify the increased work connected to the usage of the diagnostic procedure in daily practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: n/a. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-023-10355-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10687998
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106879982023-11-30 Implementing PCR testing in general practice—a qualitative study using normalization process theory Shahrzad, Sinead Balasubramaniam, Kirubakaran Kousgaard, Marius Brostrøm Thilsing, Trine Søndergaard, Jens Overbeck, Gritt BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic brought attention to a need for rapid testing of large populations. Experiences from community-based testing settings show that there can be workload difficulties, logistical challenges and socioeconomic downsides to large scale Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) testing. Alternative testing arenas have therefore been considered. Rapid point-of-care (POC) PCR test methods have since been developed and could have potential to surveille viral respiratory infections. It is, however, unknown if PCR testing can be successfully implemented routinely in general practice. The aim of this study was to assess factors that enable and inhibit the implementation of point-of-care PCR testing for acute respiratory tract infection in general practice. METHODS: Fourteen general practices in the east Zealand area in Denmark were included in the study and given access to POC PCR testing equipment during a flu season. The participating clinics were initially trained in the use of a POC PCR testing device and then spent 6 weeks testing it. We conducted qualitative interviews with general practitioners (GPs) and their staff, before and after the testing period, specifically focusing on their clinical decision-making and internal collaboration in relation to POC PCR testing. We used normalization process theory to design the interview guides and to analyze the data. RESULTS: Professionals reported no clinical need for a POC PCR testing device in a non-pandemic clinical setting. Results were delivered faster, but this was only timesaving for the patient and not the GP, who had to perform more tasks. CONCLUSION: In its current form, the added diagnostic value of using POC PCR testing in general practice was not sufficient for the professionals to justify the increased work connected to the usage of the diagnostic procedure in daily practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: n/a. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-023-10355-4. BioMed Central 2023-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10687998/ /pubmed/38037044 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-10355-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Shahrzad, Sinead
Balasubramaniam, Kirubakaran
Kousgaard, Marius Brostrøm
Thilsing, Trine
Søndergaard, Jens
Overbeck, Gritt
Implementing PCR testing in general practice—a qualitative study using normalization process theory
title Implementing PCR testing in general practice—a qualitative study using normalization process theory
title_full Implementing PCR testing in general practice—a qualitative study using normalization process theory
title_fullStr Implementing PCR testing in general practice—a qualitative study using normalization process theory
title_full_unstemmed Implementing PCR testing in general practice—a qualitative study using normalization process theory
title_short Implementing PCR testing in general practice—a qualitative study using normalization process theory
title_sort implementing pcr testing in general practice—a qualitative study using normalization process theory
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10687998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38037044
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-10355-4
work_keys_str_mv AT shahrzadsinead implementingpcrtestingingeneralpracticeaqualitativestudyusingnormalizationprocesstheory
AT balasubramaniamkirubakaran implementingpcrtestingingeneralpracticeaqualitativestudyusingnormalizationprocesstheory
AT kousgaardmariusbrostrøm implementingpcrtestingingeneralpracticeaqualitativestudyusingnormalizationprocesstheory
AT thilsingtrine implementingpcrtestingingeneralpracticeaqualitativestudyusingnormalizationprocesstheory
AT søndergaardjens implementingpcrtestingingeneralpracticeaqualitativestudyusingnormalizationprocesstheory
AT overbeckgritt implementingpcrtestingingeneralpracticeaqualitativestudyusingnormalizationprocesstheory