Cargando…
Implementing PCR testing in general practice—a qualitative study using normalization process theory
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic brought attention to a need for rapid testing of large populations. Experiences from community-based testing settings show that there can be workload difficulties, logistical challenges and socioeconomic downsides to large scale Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) testi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10687998/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38037044 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-10355-4 |
_version_ | 1785152090566295552 |
---|---|
author | Shahrzad, Sinead Balasubramaniam, Kirubakaran Kousgaard, Marius Brostrøm Thilsing, Trine Søndergaard, Jens Overbeck, Gritt |
author_facet | Shahrzad, Sinead Balasubramaniam, Kirubakaran Kousgaard, Marius Brostrøm Thilsing, Trine Søndergaard, Jens Overbeck, Gritt |
author_sort | Shahrzad, Sinead |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic brought attention to a need for rapid testing of large populations. Experiences from community-based testing settings show that there can be workload difficulties, logistical challenges and socioeconomic downsides to large scale Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) testing. Alternative testing arenas have therefore been considered. Rapid point-of-care (POC) PCR test methods have since been developed and could have potential to surveille viral respiratory infections. It is, however, unknown if PCR testing can be successfully implemented routinely in general practice. The aim of this study was to assess factors that enable and inhibit the implementation of point-of-care PCR testing for acute respiratory tract infection in general practice. METHODS: Fourteen general practices in the east Zealand area in Denmark were included in the study and given access to POC PCR testing equipment during a flu season. The participating clinics were initially trained in the use of a POC PCR testing device and then spent 6 weeks testing it. We conducted qualitative interviews with general practitioners (GPs) and their staff, before and after the testing period, specifically focusing on their clinical decision-making and internal collaboration in relation to POC PCR testing. We used normalization process theory to design the interview guides and to analyze the data. RESULTS: Professionals reported no clinical need for a POC PCR testing device in a non-pandemic clinical setting. Results were delivered faster, but this was only timesaving for the patient and not the GP, who had to perform more tasks. CONCLUSION: In its current form, the added diagnostic value of using POC PCR testing in general practice was not sufficient for the professionals to justify the increased work connected to the usage of the diagnostic procedure in daily practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: n/a. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-023-10355-4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10687998 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106879982023-11-30 Implementing PCR testing in general practice—a qualitative study using normalization process theory Shahrzad, Sinead Balasubramaniam, Kirubakaran Kousgaard, Marius Brostrøm Thilsing, Trine Søndergaard, Jens Overbeck, Gritt BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic brought attention to a need for rapid testing of large populations. Experiences from community-based testing settings show that there can be workload difficulties, logistical challenges and socioeconomic downsides to large scale Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) testing. Alternative testing arenas have therefore been considered. Rapid point-of-care (POC) PCR test methods have since been developed and could have potential to surveille viral respiratory infections. It is, however, unknown if PCR testing can be successfully implemented routinely in general practice. The aim of this study was to assess factors that enable and inhibit the implementation of point-of-care PCR testing for acute respiratory tract infection in general practice. METHODS: Fourteen general practices in the east Zealand area in Denmark were included in the study and given access to POC PCR testing equipment during a flu season. The participating clinics were initially trained in the use of a POC PCR testing device and then spent 6 weeks testing it. We conducted qualitative interviews with general practitioners (GPs) and their staff, before and after the testing period, specifically focusing on their clinical decision-making and internal collaboration in relation to POC PCR testing. We used normalization process theory to design the interview guides and to analyze the data. RESULTS: Professionals reported no clinical need for a POC PCR testing device in a non-pandemic clinical setting. Results were delivered faster, but this was only timesaving for the patient and not the GP, who had to perform more tasks. CONCLUSION: In its current form, the added diagnostic value of using POC PCR testing in general practice was not sufficient for the professionals to justify the increased work connected to the usage of the diagnostic procedure in daily practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: n/a. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-023-10355-4. BioMed Central 2023-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10687998/ /pubmed/38037044 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-10355-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Shahrzad, Sinead Balasubramaniam, Kirubakaran Kousgaard, Marius Brostrøm Thilsing, Trine Søndergaard, Jens Overbeck, Gritt Implementing PCR testing in general practice—a qualitative study using normalization process theory |
title | Implementing PCR testing in general practice—a qualitative study using normalization process theory |
title_full | Implementing PCR testing in general practice—a qualitative study using normalization process theory |
title_fullStr | Implementing PCR testing in general practice—a qualitative study using normalization process theory |
title_full_unstemmed | Implementing PCR testing in general practice—a qualitative study using normalization process theory |
title_short | Implementing PCR testing in general practice—a qualitative study using normalization process theory |
title_sort | implementing pcr testing in general practice—a qualitative study using normalization process theory |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10687998/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38037044 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-10355-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shahrzadsinead implementingpcrtestingingeneralpracticeaqualitativestudyusingnormalizationprocesstheory AT balasubramaniamkirubakaran implementingpcrtestingingeneralpracticeaqualitativestudyusingnormalizationprocesstheory AT kousgaardmariusbrostrøm implementingpcrtestingingeneralpracticeaqualitativestudyusingnormalizationprocesstheory AT thilsingtrine implementingpcrtestingingeneralpracticeaqualitativestudyusingnormalizationprocesstheory AT søndergaardjens implementingpcrtestingingeneralpracticeaqualitativestudyusingnormalizationprocesstheory AT overbeckgritt implementingpcrtestingingeneralpracticeaqualitativestudyusingnormalizationprocesstheory |