Cargando…
Estimated diameter increase from a 4S to a 6S hamstring graft configuration – A cadaveric study
Purpose: Graft diameter in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions has been shown to influence the risk of failure. It is therefore important to be able to adjust the graft configuration to modify the diameter. To measure the impact of a 6-strand (6S) hamstring autograft configuration on graft di...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
EDP Sciences
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10688256/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38032265 http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2023033 |
_version_ | 1785152146333761536 |
---|---|
author | Bourgeault-Gagnon, Yoan Leang, Alexandre Keith Bédard, Sonia Lebel, Karina Balg, Frédéric Vézina, François |
author_facet | Bourgeault-Gagnon, Yoan Leang, Alexandre Keith Bédard, Sonia Lebel, Karina Balg, Frédéric Vézina, François |
author_sort | Bourgeault-Gagnon, Yoan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose: Graft diameter in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions has been shown to influence the risk of failure. It is therefore important to be able to adjust the graft configuration to modify the diameter. To measure the impact of a 6-strand (6S) hamstring autograft configuration on graft diameter compared to the standard 4-strand (4S) configuration. Methods: Cadaveric study on 33 knees, using the usual hamstring graft harvesting technique. Semitendinosus and gracilis tendons were harvested and their length, width, and diameter were measured in 4S and 6S configurations separately by three evaluators. Results: 6S configuration leads to a median increase of 1.5 (range: 0.0–2.0) mm in diameter compared to 4S (p < 0.001). A graft diameter of more than 8 mm is attained in less than a third of 4S grafts within this population in comparison to 84% when the 6S configuration is used. Discussion: The 6S hamstring graft configuration increases the graft diameter by a median of 1.5 millimeters compared to the traditional 4S configuration. It can reliably be used to obtain an 8.5 mm graft diameter or more in cases where the semitendinosus measures at least 270.5 mm and the 4S configuration has a diameter of 7.5 mm or 8 mm. This information helps to better delineate the impact of a 6S configuration in a pre-operative or intra-operative setting to optimize the decisional process and surgical flow and to easily adapt the graft diameter. Level of evidence: V (cadaveric study) |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10688256 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | EDP Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106882562023-11-30 Estimated diameter increase from a 4S to a 6S hamstring graft configuration – A cadaveric study Bourgeault-Gagnon, Yoan Leang, Alexandre Keith Bédard, Sonia Lebel, Karina Balg, Frédéric Vézina, François SICOT J Original Article Purpose: Graft diameter in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions has been shown to influence the risk of failure. It is therefore important to be able to adjust the graft configuration to modify the diameter. To measure the impact of a 6-strand (6S) hamstring autograft configuration on graft diameter compared to the standard 4-strand (4S) configuration. Methods: Cadaveric study on 33 knees, using the usual hamstring graft harvesting technique. Semitendinosus and gracilis tendons were harvested and their length, width, and diameter were measured in 4S and 6S configurations separately by three evaluators. Results: 6S configuration leads to a median increase of 1.5 (range: 0.0–2.0) mm in diameter compared to 4S (p < 0.001). A graft diameter of more than 8 mm is attained in less than a third of 4S grafts within this population in comparison to 84% when the 6S configuration is used. Discussion: The 6S hamstring graft configuration increases the graft diameter by a median of 1.5 millimeters compared to the traditional 4S configuration. It can reliably be used to obtain an 8.5 mm graft diameter or more in cases where the semitendinosus measures at least 270.5 mm and the 4S configuration has a diameter of 7.5 mm or 8 mm. This information helps to better delineate the impact of a 6S configuration in a pre-operative or intra-operative setting to optimize the decisional process and surgical flow and to easily adapt the graft diameter. Level of evidence: V (cadaveric study) EDP Sciences 2023-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10688256/ /pubmed/38032265 http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2023033 Text en © The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Bourgeault-Gagnon, Yoan Leang, Alexandre Keith Bédard, Sonia Lebel, Karina Balg, Frédéric Vézina, François Estimated diameter increase from a 4S to a 6S hamstring graft configuration – A cadaveric study |
title | Estimated diameter increase from a 4S to a 6S hamstring graft configuration – A cadaveric study |
title_full | Estimated diameter increase from a 4S to a 6S hamstring graft configuration – A cadaveric study |
title_fullStr | Estimated diameter increase from a 4S to a 6S hamstring graft configuration – A cadaveric study |
title_full_unstemmed | Estimated diameter increase from a 4S to a 6S hamstring graft configuration – A cadaveric study |
title_short | Estimated diameter increase from a 4S to a 6S hamstring graft configuration – A cadaveric study |
title_sort | estimated diameter increase from a 4s to a 6s hamstring graft configuration – a cadaveric study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10688256/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38032265 http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2023033 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bourgeaultgagnonyoan estimateddiameterincreasefroma4stoa6shamstringgraftconfigurationacadavericstudy AT leangalexandrekeith estimateddiameterincreasefroma4stoa6shamstringgraftconfigurationacadavericstudy AT bedardsonia estimateddiameterincreasefroma4stoa6shamstringgraftconfigurationacadavericstudy AT lebelkarina estimateddiameterincreasefroma4stoa6shamstringgraftconfigurationacadavericstudy AT balgfrederic estimateddiameterincreasefroma4stoa6shamstringgraftconfigurationacadavericstudy AT vezinafrancois estimateddiameterincreasefroma4stoa6shamstringgraftconfigurationacadavericstudy |