Cargando…

Optimal Embryo Selection: The Irreplaceable Role of the Embryologist in an Age of Advancing Technology

BACKGROUND: Time-lapse incubators allow for ongoing evaluation of embryos without culture condition disruption. The use of time-lapse incubation has been shown to improve outcomes either by improving overall conditions or providing additional information to aid in embryo selection for transfer. Time...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rauchfuss, Lauren Kendall, Zhao, Yulian, Walker, David, Galantis, Terri, Fredrickson, Jolene, Barud, Kathrynne, Shenoy, Chandra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10688284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38045503
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_98_23
_version_ 1785152152284430336
author Rauchfuss, Lauren Kendall
Zhao, Yulian
Walker, David
Galantis, Terri
Fredrickson, Jolene
Barud, Kathrynne
Shenoy, Chandra
author_facet Rauchfuss, Lauren Kendall
Zhao, Yulian
Walker, David
Galantis, Terri
Fredrickson, Jolene
Barud, Kathrynne
Shenoy, Chandra
author_sort Rauchfuss, Lauren Kendall
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Time-lapse incubators allow for ongoing evaluation of embryos without culture condition disruption. The use of time-lapse incubation has been shown to improve outcomes either by improving overall conditions or providing additional information to aid in embryo selection for transfer. Time-lapse incubators can also utilise morphokinetic models to rank embryos based on morphokinetic parameters. We sought to compare a morphokinetic model for embryo comparison to traditional morphologic evaluation. AIMS: The aim of the study is to compare a morphokinetic model for embryo comparison to traditional morphologic evaluation. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort design. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Embryos cultured in a time-lapse culture system that had traditional morphologic evaluation, morphokinetic modelling and known live birth outcomes were included in this study. Embryos with unknown competence were excluded, including when two embryos were transferred with a single live birth resulted. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were determined for both the morphologic analysis and the morphokinetic model on culture day 3 and day 5. Using the ROC-determined cutoff that optimised both sensitivity and specificity, a binary outcome for each test was analysed using agreement statistics to determine if one method of embryo evaluation was superior to the other. RESULTS: Morphological and morphokinetic grading were both predictive of embryo competence on days 3 and 5. However, on day 3, morphologic grading was superior to morphokinetic grading with area under the curve (AUC) of 0.66 (P < 0.001) and 0.58 (P = 0.009), respectively. Contrarily, on day 5, the morphokinetic model had a higher AUC of 0.65 (P = 0.03) compared to the morphologic grading, AUC 0.56 (P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Traditional morphology was noted to be a better diagnostic tool (higher AUC) on culture day 3 while a morphokinetic model was superior on day 5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10688284
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106882842023-12-01 Optimal Embryo Selection: The Irreplaceable Role of the Embryologist in an Age of Advancing Technology Rauchfuss, Lauren Kendall Zhao, Yulian Walker, David Galantis, Terri Fredrickson, Jolene Barud, Kathrynne Shenoy, Chandra J Hum Reprod Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: Time-lapse incubators allow for ongoing evaluation of embryos without culture condition disruption. The use of time-lapse incubation has been shown to improve outcomes either by improving overall conditions or providing additional information to aid in embryo selection for transfer. Time-lapse incubators can also utilise morphokinetic models to rank embryos based on morphokinetic parameters. We sought to compare a morphokinetic model for embryo comparison to traditional morphologic evaluation. AIMS: The aim of the study is to compare a morphokinetic model for embryo comparison to traditional morphologic evaluation. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort design. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Embryos cultured in a time-lapse culture system that had traditional morphologic evaluation, morphokinetic modelling and known live birth outcomes were included in this study. Embryos with unknown competence were excluded, including when two embryos were transferred with a single live birth resulted. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were determined for both the morphologic analysis and the morphokinetic model on culture day 3 and day 5. Using the ROC-determined cutoff that optimised both sensitivity and specificity, a binary outcome for each test was analysed using agreement statistics to determine if one method of embryo evaluation was superior to the other. RESULTS: Morphological and morphokinetic grading were both predictive of embryo competence on days 3 and 5. However, on day 3, morphologic grading was superior to morphokinetic grading with area under the curve (AUC) of 0.66 (P < 0.001) and 0.58 (P = 0.009), respectively. Contrarily, on day 5, the morphokinetic model had a higher AUC of 0.65 (P = 0.03) compared to the morphologic grading, AUC 0.56 (P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Traditional morphology was noted to be a better diagnostic tool (higher AUC) on culture day 3 while a morphokinetic model was superior on day 5. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023 2023-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10688284/ /pubmed/38045503 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_98_23 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Rauchfuss, Lauren Kendall
Zhao, Yulian
Walker, David
Galantis, Terri
Fredrickson, Jolene
Barud, Kathrynne
Shenoy, Chandra
Optimal Embryo Selection: The Irreplaceable Role of the Embryologist in an Age of Advancing Technology
title Optimal Embryo Selection: The Irreplaceable Role of the Embryologist in an Age of Advancing Technology
title_full Optimal Embryo Selection: The Irreplaceable Role of the Embryologist in an Age of Advancing Technology
title_fullStr Optimal Embryo Selection: The Irreplaceable Role of the Embryologist in an Age of Advancing Technology
title_full_unstemmed Optimal Embryo Selection: The Irreplaceable Role of the Embryologist in an Age of Advancing Technology
title_short Optimal Embryo Selection: The Irreplaceable Role of the Embryologist in an Age of Advancing Technology
title_sort optimal embryo selection: the irreplaceable role of the embryologist in an age of advancing technology
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10688284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38045503
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_98_23
work_keys_str_mv AT rauchfusslaurenkendall optimalembryoselectiontheirreplaceableroleoftheembryologistinanageofadvancingtechnology
AT zhaoyulian optimalembryoselectiontheirreplaceableroleoftheembryologistinanageofadvancingtechnology
AT walkerdavid optimalembryoselectiontheirreplaceableroleoftheembryologistinanageofadvancingtechnology
AT galantisterri optimalembryoselectiontheirreplaceableroleoftheembryologistinanageofadvancingtechnology
AT fredricksonjolene optimalembryoselectiontheirreplaceableroleoftheembryologistinanageofadvancingtechnology
AT barudkathrynne optimalembryoselectiontheirreplaceableroleoftheembryologistinanageofadvancingtechnology
AT shenoychandra optimalembryoselectiontheirreplaceableroleoftheembryologistinanageofadvancingtechnology