Cargando…
Optimal Embryo Selection: The Irreplaceable Role of the Embryologist in an Age of Advancing Technology
BACKGROUND: Time-lapse incubators allow for ongoing evaluation of embryos without culture condition disruption. The use of time-lapse incubation has been shown to improve outcomes either by improving overall conditions or providing additional information to aid in embryo selection for transfer. Time...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10688284/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38045503 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_98_23 |
_version_ | 1785152152284430336 |
---|---|
author | Rauchfuss, Lauren Kendall Zhao, Yulian Walker, David Galantis, Terri Fredrickson, Jolene Barud, Kathrynne Shenoy, Chandra |
author_facet | Rauchfuss, Lauren Kendall Zhao, Yulian Walker, David Galantis, Terri Fredrickson, Jolene Barud, Kathrynne Shenoy, Chandra |
author_sort | Rauchfuss, Lauren Kendall |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Time-lapse incubators allow for ongoing evaluation of embryos without culture condition disruption. The use of time-lapse incubation has been shown to improve outcomes either by improving overall conditions or providing additional information to aid in embryo selection for transfer. Time-lapse incubators can also utilise morphokinetic models to rank embryos based on morphokinetic parameters. We sought to compare a morphokinetic model for embryo comparison to traditional morphologic evaluation. AIMS: The aim of the study is to compare a morphokinetic model for embryo comparison to traditional morphologic evaluation. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort design. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Embryos cultured in a time-lapse culture system that had traditional morphologic evaluation, morphokinetic modelling and known live birth outcomes were included in this study. Embryos with unknown competence were excluded, including when two embryos were transferred with a single live birth resulted. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were determined for both the morphologic analysis and the morphokinetic model on culture day 3 and day 5. Using the ROC-determined cutoff that optimised both sensitivity and specificity, a binary outcome for each test was analysed using agreement statistics to determine if one method of embryo evaluation was superior to the other. RESULTS: Morphological and morphokinetic grading were both predictive of embryo competence on days 3 and 5. However, on day 3, morphologic grading was superior to morphokinetic grading with area under the curve (AUC) of 0.66 (P < 0.001) and 0.58 (P = 0.009), respectively. Contrarily, on day 5, the morphokinetic model had a higher AUC of 0.65 (P = 0.03) compared to the morphologic grading, AUC 0.56 (P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Traditional morphology was noted to be a better diagnostic tool (higher AUC) on culture day 3 while a morphokinetic model was superior on day 5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10688284 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106882842023-12-01 Optimal Embryo Selection: The Irreplaceable Role of the Embryologist in an Age of Advancing Technology Rauchfuss, Lauren Kendall Zhao, Yulian Walker, David Galantis, Terri Fredrickson, Jolene Barud, Kathrynne Shenoy, Chandra J Hum Reprod Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: Time-lapse incubators allow for ongoing evaluation of embryos without culture condition disruption. The use of time-lapse incubation has been shown to improve outcomes either by improving overall conditions or providing additional information to aid in embryo selection for transfer. Time-lapse incubators can also utilise morphokinetic models to rank embryos based on morphokinetic parameters. We sought to compare a morphokinetic model for embryo comparison to traditional morphologic evaluation. AIMS: The aim of the study is to compare a morphokinetic model for embryo comparison to traditional morphologic evaluation. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort design. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Embryos cultured in a time-lapse culture system that had traditional morphologic evaluation, morphokinetic modelling and known live birth outcomes were included in this study. Embryos with unknown competence were excluded, including when two embryos were transferred with a single live birth resulted. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were determined for both the morphologic analysis and the morphokinetic model on culture day 3 and day 5. Using the ROC-determined cutoff that optimised both sensitivity and specificity, a binary outcome for each test was analysed using agreement statistics to determine if one method of embryo evaluation was superior to the other. RESULTS: Morphological and morphokinetic grading were both predictive of embryo competence on days 3 and 5. However, on day 3, morphologic grading was superior to morphokinetic grading with area under the curve (AUC) of 0.66 (P < 0.001) and 0.58 (P = 0.009), respectively. Contrarily, on day 5, the morphokinetic model had a higher AUC of 0.65 (P = 0.03) compared to the morphologic grading, AUC 0.56 (P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Traditional morphology was noted to be a better diagnostic tool (higher AUC) on culture day 3 while a morphokinetic model was superior on day 5. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023 2023-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10688284/ /pubmed/38045503 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_98_23 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Rauchfuss, Lauren Kendall Zhao, Yulian Walker, David Galantis, Terri Fredrickson, Jolene Barud, Kathrynne Shenoy, Chandra Optimal Embryo Selection: The Irreplaceable Role of the Embryologist in an Age of Advancing Technology |
title | Optimal Embryo Selection: The Irreplaceable Role of the Embryologist in an Age of Advancing Technology |
title_full | Optimal Embryo Selection: The Irreplaceable Role of the Embryologist in an Age of Advancing Technology |
title_fullStr | Optimal Embryo Selection: The Irreplaceable Role of the Embryologist in an Age of Advancing Technology |
title_full_unstemmed | Optimal Embryo Selection: The Irreplaceable Role of the Embryologist in an Age of Advancing Technology |
title_short | Optimal Embryo Selection: The Irreplaceable Role of the Embryologist in an Age of Advancing Technology |
title_sort | optimal embryo selection: the irreplaceable role of the embryologist in an age of advancing technology |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10688284/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38045503 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_98_23 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rauchfusslaurenkendall optimalembryoselectiontheirreplaceableroleoftheembryologistinanageofadvancingtechnology AT zhaoyulian optimalembryoselectiontheirreplaceableroleoftheembryologistinanageofadvancingtechnology AT walkerdavid optimalembryoselectiontheirreplaceableroleoftheembryologistinanageofadvancingtechnology AT galantisterri optimalembryoselectiontheirreplaceableroleoftheembryologistinanageofadvancingtechnology AT fredricksonjolene optimalembryoselectiontheirreplaceableroleoftheembryologistinanageofadvancingtechnology AT barudkathrynne optimalembryoselectiontheirreplaceableroleoftheembryologistinanageofadvancingtechnology AT shenoychandra optimalembryoselectiontheirreplaceableroleoftheembryologistinanageofadvancingtechnology |