Cargando…
Evaluation of retinal structure and function in prediabetes
PURPOSE: Alterations in retinal structure and function have been well documented in type 2 diabetes (T2DM). However, few studies have evaluated the eye in prediabetes (preDM), a precursor to T2DM. It is unknown which retinal deficits, if any, occur before T2DM diagnosis. This study evaluates retinal...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10688557/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38037572 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.deman.2023.100154 |
Sumario: | PURPOSE: Alterations in retinal structure and function have been well documented in type 2 diabetes (T2DM). However, few studies have evaluated the eye in prediabetes (preDM), a precursor to T2DM. It is unknown which retinal deficits, if any, occur before T2DM diagnosis. This study evaluates retinal structure via optical coherence tomography (OCT) and retinal function via multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) N1 and P1 in those with PreDM. The goal is to evaluate associations between structure and function across glucose dysfunction. METHODS: 85 subjects (aged 28–69yrs) were tested with VERIS mfERG and Heidelberg Spectralis OCT. Demographic and health information was collected. Subjects were grouped by HbA1c: 33 controls (HbA1c <5.7%), 31 with preDM (HbA1c 5.7–6.4%), and 21 with T2DM (HbA1c >6.4% at the time of testing or diagnosed by physician) and mild or no retinopathy. mfERG N1 and P1 latency and amplitude were measured for the right eye in the foveal hexagon (central 2.4°). Average macular thickness was also measured over the central 3.3°. Groups were compared with ANOVA and corrected t-tests. Models of these associations with diabetes diagnosis (in groups above) were created with backward multivariate regression. RESULTS: The T2DM group was exceptionally well-controlled with an HbA1c of 7.0% ± 0.68 but also had elevated systolic blood pressure compared to other groups (P<0.01). The age of the control group was younger (P<0.01), so other testing was age controlled. There was a borderline but statistically significant difference in P1 between the control group and both the preDM and T2DM groups after Bonferroni corrections (P<0.03). There was also a difference in N1 latency between the control and other groups (P<0.001). A multivariate model demonstrated a significant relationship between T2DM/PreDM diagnosis and delayed N1 latency, reduced foveal thickness, and age. CONCLUSIONS: Structure and function together can provide an associative model of preDM or T2DM changes for patients. Based on this multivariate model, N1 is strongly associated with preDM and T2DM. N1 findings and decreasing foveal thickness are additive and can together inform ocular health related to preDM. Future longitudinal studies are needed to understand changes in function and structure in preDM and T2DM. |
---|