Cargando…

Patients’ and GPs’ views and expectations of home monitoring with a pulse oximeter: a mixed-methods process evaluation of a pilot randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Research on how home monitoring with a pulse oximeter is executed and experienced by patients with an acute illness such as COVID-19 and their GPs is scarce. AIM: To examine the process of structured home monitoring with a pulse oximeter for patients with COVID-19, their caregivers, and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smit, Karin, Venekamp, Roderick P, Geersing, Geert-Jan, Rutten, Frans H, Schoonhoven, Lisette, Zwart, Dorien LM
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Royal College of General Practitioners 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10688924/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38035815
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2023.0139
_version_ 1785152266751180800
author Smit, Karin
Venekamp, Roderick P
Geersing, Geert-Jan
Rutten, Frans H
Schoonhoven, Lisette
Zwart, Dorien LM
author_facet Smit, Karin
Venekamp, Roderick P
Geersing, Geert-Jan
Rutten, Frans H
Schoonhoven, Lisette
Zwart, Dorien LM
author_sort Smit, Karin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Research on how home monitoring with a pulse oximeter is executed and experienced by patients with an acute illness such as COVID-19 and their GPs is scarce. AIM: To examine the process of structured home monitoring with a pulse oximeter for patients with COVID-19, their caregivers, and their GPs. DESIGN AND SETTING: This was a mixed-method process evaluation alongside a pilot feasibility randomised controlled trial. Patients drawn from a general practice setting, with COVID-19, and aged ≥40 years with cardiovascular comorbidities were included. METHOD: Quantitative trial data from 21 intervention group participants (age 63.2 years) were used, plus qualitative data from semi-structured interviews with 15 patients (age 62.9 years), eight informal caregivers, and 10 GPs. RESULTS: Adherence to the intervention was very high; 97.6% of protocolised peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO(2)) measurements in the first 14 days until admission to hospital were recorded (677/694, median daily per patient 2.7). Three identified themes from the interviews were: (a) user-friendliness of home monitoring: easy use of the pulse oximeter and patient preference of a three times daily measurement scheme; (b) patient empowerment: pulse oximeter use enhanced patient self-assurance and empowered patients and informal caregivers in disease management; and (c) added value to current clinical decision making. GPs perceived the pulse oximeter as a useful diagnostic tool and did not experience any additional workload. They felt more secure with remote monitoring with a pulse oximeter than only phone-based monitoring, but emphasised the need to keep an overall view on the patient’s condition. CONCLUSION: Structured home monitoring by pulse oximetry supports patients and their informal caregivers in managing, and GPs in monitoring, acute COVID-19 disease. It appears suitable for use in acutely ill patients in general practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10688924
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Royal College of General Practitioners
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106889242023-12-01 Patients’ and GPs’ views and expectations of home monitoring with a pulse oximeter: a mixed-methods process evaluation of a pilot randomised controlled trial Smit, Karin Venekamp, Roderick P Geersing, Geert-Jan Rutten, Frans H Schoonhoven, Lisette Zwart, Dorien LM Br J Gen Pract Research BACKGROUND: Research on how home monitoring with a pulse oximeter is executed and experienced by patients with an acute illness such as COVID-19 and their GPs is scarce. AIM: To examine the process of structured home monitoring with a pulse oximeter for patients with COVID-19, their caregivers, and their GPs. DESIGN AND SETTING: This was a mixed-method process evaluation alongside a pilot feasibility randomised controlled trial. Patients drawn from a general practice setting, with COVID-19, and aged ≥40 years with cardiovascular comorbidities were included. METHOD: Quantitative trial data from 21 intervention group participants (age 63.2 years) were used, plus qualitative data from semi-structured interviews with 15 patients (age 62.9 years), eight informal caregivers, and 10 GPs. RESULTS: Adherence to the intervention was very high; 97.6% of protocolised peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO(2)) measurements in the first 14 days until admission to hospital were recorded (677/694, median daily per patient 2.7). Three identified themes from the interviews were: (a) user-friendliness of home monitoring: easy use of the pulse oximeter and patient preference of a three times daily measurement scheme; (b) patient empowerment: pulse oximeter use enhanced patient self-assurance and empowered patients and informal caregivers in disease management; and (c) added value to current clinical decision making. GPs perceived the pulse oximeter as a useful diagnostic tool and did not experience any additional workload. They felt more secure with remote monitoring with a pulse oximeter than only phone-based monitoring, but emphasised the need to keep an overall view on the patient’s condition. CONCLUSION: Structured home monitoring by pulse oximetry supports patients and their informal caregivers in managing, and GPs in monitoring, acute COVID-19 disease. It appears suitable for use in acutely ill patients in general practice. Royal College of General Practitioners 2023-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10688924/ /pubmed/38035815 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2023.0139 Text en © The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is Open Access: CC BY 4.0 licence (http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Research
Smit, Karin
Venekamp, Roderick P
Geersing, Geert-Jan
Rutten, Frans H
Schoonhoven, Lisette
Zwart, Dorien LM
Patients’ and GPs’ views and expectations of home monitoring with a pulse oximeter: a mixed-methods process evaluation of a pilot randomised controlled trial
title Patients’ and GPs’ views and expectations of home monitoring with a pulse oximeter: a mixed-methods process evaluation of a pilot randomised controlled trial
title_full Patients’ and GPs’ views and expectations of home monitoring with a pulse oximeter: a mixed-methods process evaluation of a pilot randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Patients’ and GPs’ views and expectations of home monitoring with a pulse oximeter: a mixed-methods process evaluation of a pilot randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Patients’ and GPs’ views and expectations of home monitoring with a pulse oximeter: a mixed-methods process evaluation of a pilot randomised controlled trial
title_short Patients’ and GPs’ views and expectations of home monitoring with a pulse oximeter: a mixed-methods process evaluation of a pilot randomised controlled trial
title_sort patients’ and gps’ views and expectations of home monitoring with a pulse oximeter: a mixed-methods process evaluation of a pilot randomised controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10688924/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38035815
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2023.0139
work_keys_str_mv AT smitkarin patientsandgpsviewsandexpectationsofhomemonitoringwithapulseoximeteramixedmethodsprocessevaluationofapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT venekamproderickp patientsandgpsviewsandexpectationsofhomemonitoringwithapulseoximeteramixedmethodsprocessevaluationofapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT geersinggeertjan patientsandgpsviewsandexpectationsofhomemonitoringwithapulseoximeteramixedmethodsprocessevaluationofapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT ruttenfransh patientsandgpsviewsandexpectationsofhomemonitoringwithapulseoximeteramixedmethodsprocessevaluationofapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT schoonhovenlisette patientsandgpsviewsandexpectationsofhomemonitoringwithapulseoximeteramixedmethodsprocessevaluationofapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT zwartdorienlm patientsandgpsviewsandexpectationsofhomemonitoringwithapulseoximeteramixedmethodsprocessevaluationofapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial