Cargando…

Induction of Labour with a Double Balloon Catheter – Comparison of Effectiveness of Six Versus Twelve Hours Insertion Time: a Prospective Case Control Study

INTRODUCTION: Induction of labour is a common obstetric procedure to initiate or augment contractions when labour is delayed or uncertain. The double balloon catheter is a safe and effective mechanical method for cervical ripening during induction of labour. This study evaluates the effectiveness of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Strößner, Lena, Heimann, Yvonne, Schleußner, Ekkehard, Kolterer, Anna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2023
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10689105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38046528
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-2177-0290
_version_ 1785152301706510336
author Strößner, Lena
Heimann, Yvonne
Schleußner, Ekkehard
Kolterer, Anna
author_facet Strößner, Lena
Heimann, Yvonne
Schleußner, Ekkehard
Kolterer, Anna
author_sort Strößner, Lena
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Induction of labour is a common obstetric procedure to initiate or augment contractions when labour is delayed or uncertain. The double balloon catheter is a safe and effective mechanical method for cervical ripening during induction of labour. This study evaluates the effectiveness of reducing double balloon catheter insertion time from 12 to 6 hours. METHODS: 248 women undergoing induction with a double balloon catheter at term were divided into two groups: catheter placed for 12 hours at 8 pm in the first half of 2021 (P12) and catheter placed for 6 hours at 7 am in the second half of 2021 (P6). T-tests, chi-squared tests, and Wilcoxon signed rank test were used for statistical analysis. Primary and secondary endpoints included induction to delivery interval, prostaglandin to delivery interval, mode of delivery, and maternal and neonatal outcomes. RESULTS: The P6 group had a significantly reduced induction to delivery interval of 558 min (P6: 1348 min, P12: 1906 min, p < 0.01, 95% CI: 376–710) within demographically comparable groups. Multiparous women also showed a significant reduction in prostaglandin to delivery interval of 260 min (P6: 590 min, P12: 850 min, p = 0.038, 95% CI: 9–299). There were no significant differences in mode of delivery, maternal blood loss, or neonatal outcome. CONCLUSION: Reducing double balloon catheter placement time from 12 to 6 hours resulted in almost 9 hours less induction to delivery interval without adverse effects on maternal and neonatal outcome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10689105
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106891052023-12-01 Induction of Labour with a Double Balloon Catheter – Comparison of Effectiveness of Six Versus Twelve Hours Insertion Time: a Prospective Case Control Study Strößner, Lena Heimann, Yvonne Schleußner, Ekkehard Kolterer, Anna Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd INTRODUCTION: Induction of labour is a common obstetric procedure to initiate or augment contractions when labour is delayed or uncertain. The double balloon catheter is a safe and effective mechanical method for cervical ripening during induction of labour. This study evaluates the effectiveness of reducing double balloon catheter insertion time from 12 to 6 hours. METHODS: 248 women undergoing induction with a double balloon catheter at term were divided into two groups: catheter placed for 12 hours at 8 pm in the first half of 2021 (P12) and catheter placed for 6 hours at 7 am in the second half of 2021 (P6). T-tests, chi-squared tests, and Wilcoxon signed rank test were used for statistical analysis. Primary and secondary endpoints included induction to delivery interval, prostaglandin to delivery interval, mode of delivery, and maternal and neonatal outcomes. RESULTS: The P6 group had a significantly reduced induction to delivery interval of 558 min (P6: 1348 min, P12: 1906 min, p < 0.01, 95% CI: 376–710) within demographically comparable groups. Multiparous women also showed a significant reduction in prostaglandin to delivery interval of 260 min (P6: 590 min, P12: 850 min, p = 0.038, 95% CI: 9–299). There were no significant differences in mode of delivery, maternal blood loss, or neonatal outcome. CONCLUSION: Reducing double balloon catheter placement time from 12 to 6 hours resulted in almost 9 hours less induction to delivery interval without adverse effects on maternal and neonatal outcome. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2023-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10689105/ /pubmed/38046528 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-2177-0290 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Strößner, Lena
Heimann, Yvonne
Schleußner, Ekkehard
Kolterer, Anna
Induction of Labour with a Double Balloon Catheter – Comparison of Effectiveness of Six Versus Twelve Hours Insertion Time: a Prospective Case Control Study
title Induction of Labour with a Double Balloon Catheter – Comparison of Effectiveness of Six Versus Twelve Hours Insertion Time: a Prospective Case Control Study
title_full Induction of Labour with a Double Balloon Catheter – Comparison of Effectiveness of Six Versus Twelve Hours Insertion Time: a Prospective Case Control Study
title_fullStr Induction of Labour with a Double Balloon Catheter – Comparison of Effectiveness of Six Versus Twelve Hours Insertion Time: a Prospective Case Control Study
title_full_unstemmed Induction of Labour with a Double Balloon Catheter – Comparison of Effectiveness of Six Versus Twelve Hours Insertion Time: a Prospective Case Control Study
title_short Induction of Labour with a Double Balloon Catheter – Comparison of Effectiveness of Six Versus Twelve Hours Insertion Time: a Prospective Case Control Study
title_sort induction of labour with a double balloon catheter – comparison of effectiveness of six versus twelve hours insertion time: a prospective case control study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10689105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38046528
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-2177-0290
work_keys_str_mv AT stroßnerlena inductionoflabourwithadoubleballooncathetercomparisonofeffectivenessofsixversustwelvehoursinsertiontimeaprospectivecasecontrolstudy
AT heimannyvonne inductionoflabourwithadoubleballooncathetercomparisonofeffectivenessofsixversustwelvehoursinsertiontimeaprospectivecasecontrolstudy
AT schleußnerekkehard inductionoflabourwithadoubleballooncathetercomparisonofeffectivenessofsixversustwelvehoursinsertiontimeaprospectivecasecontrolstudy
AT koltereranna inductionoflabourwithadoubleballooncathetercomparisonofeffectivenessofsixversustwelvehoursinsertiontimeaprospectivecasecontrolstudy