Cargando…
Should I take aspirin? A qualitative study on the implementation of a decision aid on taking aspirin for bowel cancer prevention
OBJECTIVES: Australian guidelines recommend 50–70 years consider taking aspirin to reduce their bowel cancer risk. We trialled a decision aid in general practice to facilitate the implementation of these guidelines into clinical practice. This publication reports on the qualitative results from the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10689404/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38035774 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2023-002423 |
_version_ | 1785152359899332608 |
---|---|
author | Onwuka, Shakira McIntosh, Jennifer Boyd, Lucy Karnchanachari, Napin Macrae, Finlay Fishman, George Emery, Jon |
author_facet | Onwuka, Shakira McIntosh, Jennifer Boyd, Lucy Karnchanachari, Napin Macrae, Finlay Fishman, George Emery, Jon |
author_sort | Onwuka, Shakira |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Australian guidelines recommend 50–70 years consider taking aspirin to reduce their bowel cancer risk. We trialled a decision aid in general practice to facilitate the implementation of these guidelines into clinical practice. This publication reports on the qualitative results from the process evaluation of the trial. We aimed to explore general practitioners’ (GPs) and their patients’ approach to shared decision-making (SDM) about taking aspirin to prevent bowel cancer and how the decision aids were used in practice. METHODS: Semistructured interviews were conducted with 17 participants who received the decision aid and 12 GPs who participated in the trial between June and November 2021. The interviews were coded inductively, and emerging themes were mapped onto the Revised Programme Theory for SDM. RESULTS: The study highlighted the dynamics of SDM for taking aspirin to prevent bowel cancer. Some participants discussed the decision aid with their GPs as advised prior to taking aspirin, others either took aspirin or dismissed it outright without discussing it with their GPs. Notably, participants’ trust in their GPs, and participants’ diverse worldviews played pivotal roles in their decisions. Although the decision aid supported SDM for some, it was not always prioritised in a consultation. This was likely impacted during the trial period as the COVID-19 pandemic was the focus for general practice. CONCLUSION: In summary, this study illustrated the complexities of SDM through using a decision aid in general practice to implement the guidelines for low-dose aspirin to prevent bowel cancer. While the decision aid prompted some participants to speak to their GPs, they were also heavily influenced by their unwavering trust in the GPs and their different worldviews. In the face of the COVID-19 pandemic, SDM was not highly prioritised. This study provides insights into the implementation of guidelines into clinical practice and highlights the need for ongoing support and prioritisation of cancer prevention in general practice consultations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12620001003965. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10689404 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106894042023-12-02 Should I take aspirin? A qualitative study on the implementation of a decision aid on taking aspirin for bowel cancer prevention Onwuka, Shakira McIntosh, Jennifer Boyd, Lucy Karnchanachari, Napin Macrae, Finlay Fishman, George Emery, Jon Fam Med Community Health Original Research OBJECTIVES: Australian guidelines recommend 50–70 years consider taking aspirin to reduce their bowel cancer risk. We trialled a decision aid in general practice to facilitate the implementation of these guidelines into clinical practice. This publication reports on the qualitative results from the process evaluation of the trial. We aimed to explore general practitioners’ (GPs) and their patients’ approach to shared decision-making (SDM) about taking aspirin to prevent bowel cancer and how the decision aids were used in practice. METHODS: Semistructured interviews were conducted with 17 participants who received the decision aid and 12 GPs who participated in the trial between June and November 2021. The interviews were coded inductively, and emerging themes were mapped onto the Revised Programme Theory for SDM. RESULTS: The study highlighted the dynamics of SDM for taking aspirin to prevent bowel cancer. Some participants discussed the decision aid with their GPs as advised prior to taking aspirin, others either took aspirin or dismissed it outright without discussing it with their GPs. Notably, participants’ trust in their GPs, and participants’ diverse worldviews played pivotal roles in their decisions. Although the decision aid supported SDM for some, it was not always prioritised in a consultation. This was likely impacted during the trial period as the COVID-19 pandemic was the focus for general practice. CONCLUSION: In summary, this study illustrated the complexities of SDM through using a decision aid in general practice to implement the guidelines for low-dose aspirin to prevent bowel cancer. While the decision aid prompted some participants to speak to their GPs, they were also heavily influenced by their unwavering trust in the GPs and their different worldviews. In the face of the COVID-19 pandemic, SDM was not highly prioritised. This study provides insights into the implementation of guidelines into clinical practice and highlights the need for ongoing support and prioritisation of cancer prevention in general practice consultations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12620001003965. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10689404/ /pubmed/38035774 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2023-002423 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Onwuka, Shakira McIntosh, Jennifer Boyd, Lucy Karnchanachari, Napin Macrae, Finlay Fishman, George Emery, Jon Should I take aspirin? A qualitative study on the implementation of a decision aid on taking aspirin for bowel cancer prevention |
title | Should I take aspirin? A qualitative study on the implementation of a decision aid on taking aspirin for bowel cancer prevention |
title_full | Should I take aspirin? A qualitative study on the implementation of a decision aid on taking aspirin for bowel cancer prevention |
title_fullStr | Should I take aspirin? A qualitative study on the implementation of a decision aid on taking aspirin for bowel cancer prevention |
title_full_unstemmed | Should I take aspirin? A qualitative study on the implementation of a decision aid on taking aspirin for bowel cancer prevention |
title_short | Should I take aspirin? A qualitative study on the implementation of a decision aid on taking aspirin for bowel cancer prevention |
title_sort | should i take aspirin? a qualitative study on the implementation of a decision aid on taking aspirin for bowel cancer prevention |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10689404/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38035774 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2023-002423 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT onwukashakira shoulditakeaspirinaqualitativestudyontheimplementationofadecisionaidontakingaspirinforbowelcancerprevention AT mcintoshjennifer shoulditakeaspirinaqualitativestudyontheimplementationofadecisionaidontakingaspirinforbowelcancerprevention AT boydlucy shoulditakeaspirinaqualitativestudyontheimplementationofadecisionaidontakingaspirinforbowelcancerprevention AT karnchanacharinapin shoulditakeaspirinaqualitativestudyontheimplementationofadecisionaidontakingaspirinforbowelcancerprevention AT macraefinlay shoulditakeaspirinaqualitativestudyontheimplementationofadecisionaidontakingaspirinforbowelcancerprevention AT fishmangeorge shoulditakeaspirinaqualitativestudyontheimplementationofadecisionaidontakingaspirinforbowelcancerprevention AT emeryjon shoulditakeaspirinaqualitativestudyontheimplementationofadecisionaidontakingaspirinforbowelcancerprevention |