Cargando…

Sponsorship bias in published pharmacoeconomic evaluations of national reimbursement negotiation drugs in China: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: China’s National Reimbursement Drug List (NRDL) has become the primary route for drug reimbursement in China. More recently, the authority has made pharmacoeconomic evaluation an integral part of the application for NRDL inclusion. The underlying financial conflict of interests (FCOI) of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: He, Zixuan, Huang, Xianqin, Chen, Dingyi, Wang, Guoan, Zhu, Yuezhen, Li, Huangqianyu, Han, Sheng, Shi, Luwen, Guan, Xiaodong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10689407/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38030227
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012780
_version_ 1785152360601878528
author He, Zixuan
Huang, Xianqin
Chen, Dingyi
Wang, Guoan
Zhu, Yuezhen
Li, Huangqianyu
Han, Sheng
Shi, Luwen
Guan, Xiaodong
author_facet He, Zixuan
Huang, Xianqin
Chen, Dingyi
Wang, Guoan
Zhu, Yuezhen
Li, Huangqianyu
Han, Sheng
Shi, Luwen
Guan, Xiaodong
author_sort He, Zixuan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: China’s National Reimbursement Drug List (NRDL) has become the primary route for drug reimbursement in China. More recently, the authority has made pharmacoeconomic evaluation an integral part of the application for NRDL inclusion. The underlying financial conflict of interests (FCOI) of pharmacoeconomic evaluations, however, has the potential to influence evidence generated and thus subsequent decision-making yet remains poorly understood. METHODS: We searched for studies published between January 2012 and January 2022 on the 174 drugs added to the 2017–2020 NRDLs after successful negotiation. We categorised the study’s FCOI status into no funding, industry funding, non-profit funding and multiple fundings based on authors’ disclosure and assessed the reporting quality of included studies using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 checklist. We compiled descriptive statistics of funding types and study outcomes using t-tests and χ(2) tests and conducted multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: We identified 378 records and our final sample included 92 pharmacoeconomic evaluations, among which 69.6% were conducted with at least one funding source. More than half (57.6%) of the evaluations reached favourable conclusions towards the intervention drug and 12.6% reached a dominant result of the intervention drug over the comparison from model simulation. The reporting quality of included studies ranged from 19 to 25 (on a scale of 28), with an average of 22.3. The statistical tests indicated that industry-funded studies were significantly more likely to conclude that the intervention therapy was economical (p<0.01) and had a significantly higher proportion of resulting target drug economically dominated the comparison drug (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The study revealed that FCOI bias is common in published pharmacoeconomic evaluations conducted in Chinese settings and could significantly influence the study’s economical results and conclusions through various mechanisms. Multifaceted efforts are needed to improve transparency, comparability and reporting standardisation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10689407
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106894072023-12-02 Sponsorship bias in published pharmacoeconomic evaluations of national reimbursement negotiation drugs in China: a systematic review He, Zixuan Huang, Xianqin Chen, Dingyi Wang, Guoan Zhu, Yuezhen Li, Huangqianyu Han, Sheng Shi, Luwen Guan, Xiaodong BMJ Glob Health Original Research BACKGROUND: China’s National Reimbursement Drug List (NRDL) has become the primary route for drug reimbursement in China. More recently, the authority has made pharmacoeconomic evaluation an integral part of the application for NRDL inclusion. The underlying financial conflict of interests (FCOI) of pharmacoeconomic evaluations, however, has the potential to influence evidence generated and thus subsequent decision-making yet remains poorly understood. METHODS: We searched for studies published between January 2012 and January 2022 on the 174 drugs added to the 2017–2020 NRDLs after successful negotiation. We categorised the study’s FCOI status into no funding, industry funding, non-profit funding and multiple fundings based on authors’ disclosure and assessed the reporting quality of included studies using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 checklist. We compiled descriptive statistics of funding types and study outcomes using t-tests and χ(2) tests and conducted multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: We identified 378 records and our final sample included 92 pharmacoeconomic evaluations, among which 69.6% were conducted with at least one funding source. More than half (57.6%) of the evaluations reached favourable conclusions towards the intervention drug and 12.6% reached a dominant result of the intervention drug over the comparison from model simulation. The reporting quality of included studies ranged from 19 to 25 (on a scale of 28), with an average of 22.3. The statistical tests indicated that industry-funded studies were significantly more likely to conclude that the intervention therapy was economical (p<0.01) and had a significantly higher proportion of resulting target drug economically dominated the comparison drug (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The study revealed that FCOI bias is common in published pharmacoeconomic evaluations conducted in Chinese settings and could significantly influence the study’s economical results and conclusions through various mechanisms. Multifaceted efforts are needed to improve transparency, comparability and reporting standardisation. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10689407/ /pubmed/38030227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012780 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
He, Zixuan
Huang, Xianqin
Chen, Dingyi
Wang, Guoan
Zhu, Yuezhen
Li, Huangqianyu
Han, Sheng
Shi, Luwen
Guan, Xiaodong
Sponsorship bias in published pharmacoeconomic evaluations of national reimbursement negotiation drugs in China: a systematic review
title Sponsorship bias in published pharmacoeconomic evaluations of national reimbursement negotiation drugs in China: a systematic review
title_full Sponsorship bias in published pharmacoeconomic evaluations of national reimbursement negotiation drugs in China: a systematic review
title_fullStr Sponsorship bias in published pharmacoeconomic evaluations of national reimbursement negotiation drugs in China: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Sponsorship bias in published pharmacoeconomic evaluations of national reimbursement negotiation drugs in China: a systematic review
title_short Sponsorship bias in published pharmacoeconomic evaluations of national reimbursement negotiation drugs in China: a systematic review
title_sort sponsorship bias in published pharmacoeconomic evaluations of national reimbursement negotiation drugs in china: a systematic review
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10689407/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38030227
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012780
work_keys_str_mv AT hezixuan sponsorshipbiasinpublishedpharmacoeconomicevaluationsofnationalreimbursementnegotiationdrugsinchinaasystematicreview
AT huangxianqin sponsorshipbiasinpublishedpharmacoeconomicevaluationsofnationalreimbursementnegotiationdrugsinchinaasystematicreview
AT chendingyi sponsorshipbiasinpublishedpharmacoeconomicevaluationsofnationalreimbursementnegotiationdrugsinchinaasystematicreview
AT wangguoan sponsorshipbiasinpublishedpharmacoeconomicevaluationsofnationalreimbursementnegotiationdrugsinchinaasystematicreview
AT zhuyuezhen sponsorshipbiasinpublishedpharmacoeconomicevaluationsofnationalreimbursementnegotiationdrugsinchinaasystematicreview
AT lihuangqianyu sponsorshipbiasinpublishedpharmacoeconomicevaluationsofnationalreimbursementnegotiationdrugsinchinaasystematicreview
AT hansheng sponsorshipbiasinpublishedpharmacoeconomicevaluationsofnationalreimbursementnegotiationdrugsinchinaasystematicreview
AT shiluwen sponsorshipbiasinpublishedpharmacoeconomicevaluationsofnationalreimbursementnegotiationdrugsinchinaasystematicreview
AT guanxiaodong sponsorshipbiasinpublishedpharmacoeconomicevaluationsofnationalreimbursementnegotiationdrugsinchinaasystematicreview