Cargando…
Sponsorship bias in published pharmacoeconomic evaluations of national reimbursement negotiation drugs in China: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: China’s National Reimbursement Drug List (NRDL) has become the primary route for drug reimbursement in China. More recently, the authority has made pharmacoeconomic evaluation an integral part of the application for NRDL inclusion. The underlying financial conflict of interests (FCOI) of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10689407/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38030227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012780 |
_version_ | 1785152360601878528 |
---|---|
author | He, Zixuan Huang, Xianqin Chen, Dingyi Wang, Guoan Zhu, Yuezhen Li, Huangqianyu Han, Sheng Shi, Luwen Guan, Xiaodong |
author_facet | He, Zixuan Huang, Xianqin Chen, Dingyi Wang, Guoan Zhu, Yuezhen Li, Huangqianyu Han, Sheng Shi, Luwen Guan, Xiaodong |
author_sort | He, Zixuan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: China’s National Reimbursement Drug List (NRDL) has become the primary route for drug reimbursement in China. More recently, the authority has made pharmacoeconomic evaluation an integral part of the application for NRDL inclusion. The underlying financial conflict of interests (FCOI) of pharmacoeconomic evaluations, however, has the potential to influence evidence generated and thus subsequent decision-making yet remains poorly understood. METHODS: We searched for studies published between January 2012 and January 2022 on the 174 drugs added to the 2017–2020 NRDLs after successful negotiation. We categorised the study’s FCOI status into no funding, industry funding, non-profit funding and multiple fundings based on authors’ disclosure and assessed the reporting quality of included studies using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 checklist. We compiled descriptive statistics of funding types and study outcomes using t-tests and χ(2) tests and conducted multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: We identified 378 records and our final sample included 92 pharmacoeconomic evaluations, among which 69.6% were conducted with at least one funding source. More than half (57.6%) of the evaluations reached favourable conclusions towards the intervention drug and 12.6% reached a dominant result of the intervention drug over the comparison from model simulation. The reporting quality of included studies ranged from 19 to 25 (on a scale of 28), with an average of 22.3. The statistical tests indicated that industry-funded studies were significantly more likely to conclude that the intervention therapy was economical (p<0.01) and had a significantly higher proportion of resulting target drug economically dominated the comparison drug (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The study revealed that FCOI bias is common in published pharmacoeconomic evaluations conducted in Chinese settings and could significantly influence the study’s economical results and conclusions through various mechanisms. Multifaceted efforts are needed to improve transparency, comparability and reporting standardisation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10689407 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106894072023-12-02 Sponsorship bias in published pharmacoeconomic evaluations of national reimbursement negotiation drugs in China: a systematic review He, Zixuan Huang, Xianqin Chen, Dingyi Wang, Guoan Zhu, Yuezhen Li, Huangqianyu Han, Sheng Shi, Luwen Guan, Xiaodong BMJ Glob Health Original Research BACKGROUND: China’s National Reimbursement Drug List (NRDL) has become the primary route for drug reimbursement in China. More recently, the authority has made pharmacoeconomic evaluation an integral part of the application for NRDL inclusion. The underlying financial conflict of interests (FCOI) of pharmacoeconomic evaluations, however, has the potential to influence evidence generated and thus subsequent decision-making yet remains poorly understood. METHODS: We searched for studies published between January 2012 and January 2022 on the 174 drugs added to the 2017–2020 NRDLs after successful negotiation. We categorised the study’s FCOI status into no funding, industry funding, non-profit funding and multiple fundings based on authors’ disclosure and assessed the reporting quality of included studies using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 checklist. We compiled descriptive statistics of funding types and study outcomes using t-tests and χ(2) tests and conducted multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: We identified 378 records and our final sample included 92 pharmacoeconomic evaluations, among which 69.6% were conducted with at least one funding source. More than half (57.6%) of the evaluations reached favourable conclusions towards the intervention drug and 12.6% reached a dominant result of the intervention drug over the comparison from model simulation. The reporting quality of included studies ranged from 19 to 25 (on a scale of 28), with an average of 22.3. The statistical tests indicated that industry-funded studies were significantly more likely to conclude that the intervention therapy was economical (p<0.01) and had a significantly higher proportion of resulting target drug economically dominated the comparison drug (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The study revealed that FCOI bias is common in published pharmacoeconomic evaluations conducted in Chinese settings and could significantly influence the study’s economical results and conclusions through various mechanisms. Multifaceted efforts are needed to improve transparency, comparability and reporting standardisation. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10689407/ /pubmed/38030227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012780 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research He, Zixuan Huang, Xianqin Chen, Dingyi Wang, Guoan Zhu, Yuezhen Li, Huangqianyu Han, Sheng Shi, Luwen Guan, Xiaodong Sponsorship bias in published pharmacoeconomic evaluations of national reimbursement negotiation drugs in China: a systematic review |
title | Sponsorship bias in published pharmacoeconomic evaluations of national reimbursement negotiation drugs in China: a systematic review |
title_full | Sponsorship bias in published pharmacoeconomic evaluations of national reimbursement negotiation drugs in China: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Sponsorship bias in published pharmacoeconomic evaluations of national reimbursement negotiation drugs in China: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Sponsorship bias in published pharmacoeconomic evaluations of national reimbursement negotiation drugs in China: a systematic review |
title_short | Sponsorship bias in published pharmacoeconomic evaluations of national reimbursement negotiation drugs in China: a systematic review |
title_sort | sponsorship bias in published pharmacoeconomic evaluations of national reimbursement negotiation drugs in china: a systematic review |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10689407/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38030227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012780 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hezixuan sponsorshipbiasinpublishedpharmacoeconomicevaluationsofnationalreimbursementnegotiationdrugsinchinaasystematicreview AT huangxianqin sponsorshipbiasinpublishedpharmacoeconomicevaluationsofnationalreimbursementnegotiationdrugsinchinaasystematicreview AT chendingyi sponsorshipbiasinpublishedpharmacoeconomicevaluationsofnationalreimbursementnegotiationdrugsinchinaasystematicreview AT wangguoan sponsorshipbiasinpublishedpharmacoeconomicevaluationsofnationalreimbursementnegotiationdrugsinchinaasystematicreview AT zhuyuezhen sponsorshipbiasinpublishedpharmacoeconomicevaluationsofnationalreimbursementnegotiationdrugsinchinaasystematicreview AT lihuangqianyu sponsorshipbiasinpublishedpharmacoeconomicevaluationsofnationalreimbursementnegotiationdrugsinchinaasystematicreview AT hansheng sponsorshipbiasinpublishedpharmacoeconomicevaluationsofnationalreimbursementnegotiationdrugsinchinaasystematicreview AT shiluwen sponsorshipbiasinpublishedpharmacoeconomicevaluationsofnationalreimbursementnegotiationdrugsinchinaasystematicreview AT guanxiaodong sponsorshipbiasinpublishedpharmacoeconomicevaluationsofnationalreimbursementnegotiationdrugsinchinaasystematicreview |