Cargando…
Optimizing process flow diagrams to guide implementation of a colorectal cancer screening intervention in new settings
PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to assess acceptability of using process flow diagrams (or process maps) depicting a previously implemented evidence-based intervention (EBI) to inform the implementation of similar interventions in new settings. METHODS: We developed three different versions of p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10689519/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37731072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10552-023-01769-w |
_version_ | 1785152384770506752 |
---|---|
author | O’Leary, Meghan C. Hassmiller Lich, Kristen Reuland, Daniel S. Brenner, Alison T. Moore, Alexis A. Ratner, Shana Birken, Sarah A. Wheeler, Stephanie B. |
author_facet | O’Leary, Meghan C. Hassmiller Lich, Kristen Reuland, Daniel S. Brenner, Alison T. Moore, Alexis A. Ratner, Shana Birken, Sarah A. Wheeler, Stephanie B. |
author_sort | O’Leary, Meghan C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to assess acceptability of using process flow diagrams (or process maps) depicting a previously implemented evidence-based intervention (EBI) to inform the implementation of similar interventions in new settings. METHODS: We developed three different versions of process maps, each visualizing the implementation of the same multicomponent colorectal cancer (CRC) screening EBI in community health centers but including varying levels of detail about how it was implemented. Interviews with community health professionals and practitioners at other sites not affiliated with this intervention were conducted. We assessed their preferences related to the map designs, their potential utility for guiding EBI implementation, and the feasibility of implementing a similar intervention in their local setting given the information available in the process maps. RESULTS: Eleven community health representatives were interviewed. Participants were able to understand how the intervention was implemented and engage in discussions around the feasibility of implementing this type of complex intervention in their local system. Potential uses of the maps for supporting implementation included staff training, role delineation, monitoring and quality control, and adapting the components and implementation activities of the existing intervention. CONCLUSION: Process maps can potentially support decision-making about the adoption, implementation, and adaptation of existing EBIs in new contexts. Given the complexities involved in deciding whether and how to implement EBIs, these diagrams serve as visual, easily understood tools to inform potential future adopters of the EBI about the activities, resources, and staffing needed for implementation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10552-023-01769-w. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10689519 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106895192023-12-02 Optimizing process flow diagrams to guide implementation of a colorectal cancer screening intervention in new settings O’Leary, Meghan C. Hassmiller Lich, Kristen Reuland, Daniel S. Brenner, Alison T. Moore, Alexis A. Ratner, Shana Birken, Sarah A. Wheeler, Stephanie B. Cancer Causes Control Original Paper PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to assess acceptability of using process flow diagrams (or process maps) depicting a previously implemented evidence-based intervention (EBI) to inform the implementation of similar interventions in new settings. METHODS: We developed three different versions of process maps, each visualizing the implementation of the same multicomponent colorectal cancer (CRC) screening EBI in community health centers but including varying levels of detail about how it was implemented. Interviews with community health professionals and practitioners at other sites not affiliated with this intervention were conducted. We assessed their preferences related to the map designs, their potential utility for guiding EBI implementation, and the feasibility of implementing a similar intervention in their local setting given the information available in the process maps. RESULTS: Eleven community health representatives were interviewed. Participants were able to understand how the intervention was implemented and engage in discussions around the feasibility of implementing this type of complex intervention in their local system. Potential uses of the maps for supporting implementation included staff training, role delineation, monitoring and quality control, and adapting the components and implementation activities of the existing intervention. CONCLUSION: Process maps can potentially support decision-making about the adoption, implementation, and adaptation of existing EBIs in new contexts. Given the complexities involved in deciding whether and how to implement EBIs, these diagrams serve as visual, easily understood tools to inform potential future adopters of the EBI about the activities, resources, and staffing needed for implementation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10552-023-01769-w. Springer International Publishing 2023-09-21 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10689519/ /pubmed/37731072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10552-023-01769-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Paper O’Leary, Meghan C. Hassmiller Lich, Kristen Reuland, Daniel S. Brenner, Alison T. Moore, Alexis A. Ratner, Shana Birken, Sarah A. Wheeler, Stephanie B. Optimizing process flow diagrams to guide implementation of a colorectal cancer screening intervention in new settings |
title | Optimizing process flow diagrams to guide implementation of a colorectal cancer screening intervention in new settings |
title_full | Optimizing process flow diagrams to guide implementation of a colorectal cancer screening intervention in new settings |
title_fullStr | Optimizing process flow diagrams to guide implementation of a colorectal cancer screening intervention in new settings |
title_full_unstemmed | Optimizing process flow diagrams to guide implementation of a colorectal cancer screening intervention in new settings |
title_short | Optimizing process flow diagrams to guide implementation of a colorectal cancer screening intervention in new settings |
title_sort | optimizing process flow diagrams to guide implementation of a colorectal cancer screening intervention in new settings |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10689519/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37731072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10552-023-01769-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT olearymeghanc optimizingprocessflowdiagramstoguideimplementationofacolorectalcancerscreeninginterventioninnewsettings AT hassmillerlichkristen optimizingprocessflowdiagramstoguideimplementationofacolorectalcancerscreeninginterventioninnewsettings AT reulanddaniels optimizingprocessflowdiagramstoguideimplementationofacolorectalcancerscreeninginterventioninnewsettings AT brenneralisont optimizingprocessflowdiagramstoguideimplementationofacolorectalcancerscreeninginterventioninnewsettings AT moorealexisa optimizingprocessflowdiagramstoguideimplementationofacolorectalcancerscreeninginterventioninnewsettings AT ratnershana optimizingprocessflowdiagramstoguideimplementationofacolorectalcancerscreeninginterventioninnewsettings AT birkensaraha optimizingprocessflowdiagramstoguideimplementationofacolorectalcancerscreeninginterventioninnewsettings AT wheelerstephanieb optimizingprocessflowdiagramstoguideimplementationofacolorectalcancerscreeninginterventioninnewsettings |