Cargando…

Incidence, management, and outcome of incidental meningioma: what has happened in 10 years?

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to study the use of brain scanning, and the subsequent findings of presumed incidental meningioma in two time periods, and to study differences in follow-up, treatment, and outcome. METHODS: Records of all performed CT and MRI of the brain during two time periods w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Näslund, Olivia, Strand, Per Sveino, Solheim, Ole, Al Masri, Mohammad, Rapi, Okizeva, Thurin, Erik, Jakola, Asgeir S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10689551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37938444
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11060-023-04482-5
_version_ 1785152391136411648
author Näslund, Olivia
Strand, Per Sveino
Solheim, Ole
Al Masri, Mohammad
Rapi, Okizeva
Thurin, Erik
Jakola, Asgeir S.
author_facet Näslund, Olivia
Strand, Per Sveino
Solheim, Ole
Al Masri, Mohammad
Rapi, Okizeva
Thurin, Erik
Jakola, Asgeir S.
author_sort Näslund, Olivia
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to study the use of brain scanning, and the subsequent findings of presumed incidental meningioma in two time periods, and to study differences in follow-up, treatment, and outcome. METHODS: Records of all performed CT and MRI of the brain during two time periods were retrospectively reviewed in search of patients with presumed incidental meningioma. These patients were further analyzed using medical health records, with the purpose to study clinical handling and outcome during a 3 year follow up. RESULTS: An identical number of unique patients underwent brain imaging during the two time periods (n = 22 259 vs. 22 013). In 2018–2019, 25% more incidental meningiomas were diagnosed compared to 2008–2009 (n = 161 vs. 129, p = 0.052). MRI was used more often in 2018–2019 (26.1 vs. 12.4%, p = 0.004), and the use of contrast enhancement, irrespective of modality, also increased (26.8 vs. 12.2%, p < 0.001). In the most recent cohort, patients were older (median 79 years vs. 73 years, p = 0.03). Indications showed a significant increase of cancer without known metastases among scanned patients. 29.5 and 35.4% of patients in the cohorts were deceased 3 years after diagnosis for causes unrelated to their meningioma. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the same number of unique patients undergoing brain scans in the time periods, there was a trend towards more patients diagnosed with an incidental asymptomatic meningioma in the more recent years. This difference may be attributed to more contrast enhanced scans and more scans among the elderly but needs to be further studied. Patients in the cohort from 2018 to 2019 more often had non-metastatic cancer, with their cause of scan screening for metastases. There was no significant difference in management decision at diagnosis, but within 3 years of follow up significantly more patients in the latter cohort had been re-scanned. Almost a third of all patients were deceased within 3 years after diagnosis, due to causes other than their meningioma. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11060-023-04482-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10689551
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106895512023-12-02 Incidence, management, and outcome of incidental meningioma: what has happened in 10 years? Näslund, Olivia Strand, Per Sveino Solheim, Ole Al Masri, Mohammad Rapi, Okizeva Thurin, Erik Jakola, Asgeir S. J Neurooncol Research PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to study the use of brain scanning, and the subsequent findings of presumed incidental meningioma in two time periods, and to study differences in follow-up, treatment, and outcome. METHODS: Records of all performed CT and MRI of the brain during two time periods were retrospectively reviewed in search of patients with presumed incidental meningioma. These patients were further analyzed using medical health records, with the purpose to study clinical handling and outcome during a 3 year follow up. RESULTS: An identical number of unique patients underwent brain imaging during the two time periods (n = 22 259 vs. 22 013). In 2018–2019, 25% more incidental meningiomas were diagnosed compared to 2008–2009 (n = 161 vs. 129, p = 0.052). MRI was used more often in 2018–2019 (26.1 vs. 12.4%, p = 0.004), and the use of contrast enhancement, irrespective of modality, also increased (26.8 vs. 12.2%, p < 0.001). In the most recent cohort, patients were older (median 79 years vs. 73 years, p = 0.03). Indications showed a significant increase of cancer without known metastases among scanned patients. 29.5 and 35.4% of patients in the cohorts were deceased 3 years after diagnosis for causes unrelated to their meningioma. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the same number of unique patients undergoing brain scans in the time periods, there was a trend towards more patients diagnosed with an incidental asymptomatic meningioma in the more recent years. This difference may be attributed to more contrast enhanced scans and more scans among the elderly but needs to be further studied. Patients in the cohort from 2018 to 2019 more often had non-metastatic cancer, with their cause of scan screening for metastases. There was no significant difference in management decision at diagnosis, but within 3 years of follow up significantly more patients in the latter cohort had been re-scanned. Almost a third of all patients were deceased within 3 years after diagnosis, due to causes other than their meningioma. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11060-023-04482-5. Springer US 2023-11-08 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10689551/ /pubmed/37938444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11060-023-04482-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Näslund, Olivia
Strand, Per Sveino
Solheim, Ole
Al Masri, Mohammad
Rapi, Okizeva
Thurin, Erik
Jakola, Asgeir S.
Incidence, management, and outcome of incidental meningioma: what has happened in 10 years?
title Incidence, management, and outcome of incidental meningioma: what has happened in 10 years?
title_full Incidence, management, and outcome of incidental meningioma: what has happened in 10 years?
title_fullStr Incidence, management, and outcome of incidental meningioma: what has happened in 10 years?
title_full_unstemmed Incidence, management, and outcome of incidental meningioma: what has happened in 10 years?
title_short Incidence, management, and outcome of incidental meningioma: what has happened in 10 years?
title_sort incidence, management, and outcome of incidental meningioma: what has happened in 10 years?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10689551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37938444
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11060-023-04482-5
work_keys_str_mv AT naslundolivia incidencemanagementandoutcomeofincidentalmeningiomawhathashappenedin10years
AT strandpersveino incidencemanagementandoutcomeofincidentalmeningiomawhathashappenedin10years
AT solheimole incidencemanagementandoutcomeofincidentalmeningiomawhathashappenedin10years
AT almasrimohammad incidencemanagementandoutcomeofincidentalmeningiomawhathashappenedin10years
AT rapiokizeva incidencemanagementandoutcomeofincidentalmeningiomawhathashappenedin10years
AT thurinerik incidencemanagementandoutcomeofincidentalmeningiomawhathashappenedin10years
AT jakolaasgeirs incidencemanagementandoutcomeofincidentalmeningiomawhathashappenedin10years