Cargando…
Incidence, management, and outcome of incidental meningioma: what has happened in 10 years?
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to study the use of brain scanning, and the subsequent findings of presumed incidental meningioma in two time periods, and to study differences in follow-up, treatment, and outcome. METHODS: Records of all performed CT and MRI of the brain during two time periods w...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10689551/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37938444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11060-023-04482-5 |
_version_ | 1785152391136411648 |
---|---|
author | Näslund, Olivia Strand, Per Sveino Solheim, Ole Al Masri, Mohammad Rapi, Okizeva Thurin, Erik Jakola, Asgeir S. |
author_facet | Näslund, Olivia Strand, Per Sveino Solheim, Ole Al Masri, Mohammad Rapi, Okizeva Thurin, Erik Jakola, Asgeir S. |
author_sort | Näslund, Olivia |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to study the use of brain scanning, and the subsequent findings of presumed incidental meningioma in two time periods, and to study differences in follow-up, treatment, and outcome. METHODS: Records of all performed CT and MRI of the brain during two time periods were retrospectively reviewed in search of patients with presumed incidental meningioma. These patients were further analyzed using medical health records, with the purpose to study clinical handling and outcome during a 3 year follow up. RESULTS: An identical number of unique patients underwent brain imaging during the two time periods (n = 22 259 vs. 22 013). In 2018–2019, 25% more incidental meningiomas were diagnosed compared to 2008–2009 (n = 161 vs. 129, p = 0.052). MRI was used more often in 2018–2019 (26.1 vs. 12.4%, p = 0.004), and the use of contrast enhancement, irrespective of modality, also increased (26.8 vs. 12.2%, p < 0.001). In the most recent cohort, patients were older (median 79 years vs. 73 years, p = 0.03). Indications showed a significant increase of cancer without known metastases among scanned patients. 29.5 and 35.4% of patients in the cohorts were deceased 3 years after diagnosis for causes unrelated to their meningioma. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the same number of unique patients undergoing brain scans in the time periods, there was a trend towards more patients diagnosed with an incidental asymptomatic meningioma in the more recent years. This difference may be attributed to more contrast enhanced scans and more scans among the elderly but needs to be further studied. Patients in the cohort from 2018 to 2019 more often had non-metastatic cancer, with their cause of scan screening for metastases. There was no significant difference in management decision at diagnosis, but within 3 years of follow up significantly more patients in the latter cohort had been re-scanned. Almost a third of all patients were deceased within 3 years after diagnosis, due to causes other than their meningioma. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11060-023-04482-5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10689551 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106895512023-12-02 Incidence, management, and outcome of incidental meningioma: what has happened in 10 years? Näslund, Olivia Strand, Per Sveino Solheim, Ole Al Masri, Mohammad Rapi, Okizeva Thurin, Erik Jakola, Asgeir S. J Neurooncol Research PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to study the use of brain scanning, and the subsequent findings of presumed incidental meningioma in two time periods, and to study differences in follow-up, treatment, and outcome. METHODS: Records of all performed CT and MRI of the brain during two time periods were retrospectively reviewed in search of patients with presumed incidental meningioma. These patients were further analyzed using medical health records, with the purpose to study clinical handling and outcome during a 3 year follow up. RESULTS: An identical number of unique patients underwent brain imaging during the two time periods (n = 22 259 vs. 22 013). In 2018–2019, 25% more incidental meningiomas were diagnosed compared to 2008–2009 (n = 161 vs. 129, p = 0.052). MRI was used more often in 2018–2019 (26.1 vs. 12.4%, p = 0.004), and the use of contrast enhancement, irrespective of modality, also increased (26.8 vs. 12.2%, p < 0.001). In the most recent cohort, patients were older (median 79 years vs. 73 years, p = 0.03). Indications showed a significant increase of cancer without known metastases among scanned patients. 29.5 and 35.4% of patients in the cohorts were deceased 3 years after diagnosis for causes unrelated to their meningioma. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the same number of unique patients undergoing brain scans in the time periods, there was a trend towards more patients diagnosed with an incidental asymptomatic meningioma in the more recent years. This difference may be attributed to more contrast enhanced scans and more scans among the elderly but needs to be further studied. Patients in the cohort from 2018 to 2019 more often had non-metastatic cancer, with their cause of scan screening for metastases. There was no significant difference in management decision at diagnosis, but within 3 years of follow up significantly more patients in the latter cohort had been re-scanned. Almost a third of all patients were deceased within 3 years after diagnosis, due to causes other than their meningioma. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11060-023-04482-5. Springer US 2023-11-08 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10689551/ /pubmed/37938444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11060-023-04482-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Näslund, Olivia Strand, Per Sveino Solheim, Ole Al Masri, Mohammad Rapi, Okizeva Thurin, Erik Jakola, Asgeir S. Incidence, management, and outcome of incidental meningioma: what has happened in 10 years? |
title | Incidence, management, and outcome of incidental meningioma: what has happened in 10 years? |
title_full | Incidence, management, and outcome of incidental meningioma: what has happened in 10 years? |
title_fullStr | Incidence, management, and outcome of incidental meningioma: what has happened in 10 years? |
title_full_unstemmed | Incidence, management, and outcome of incidental meningioma: what has happened in 10 years? |
title_short | Incidence, management, and outcome of incidental meningioma: what has happened in 10 years? |
title_sort | incidence, management, and outcome of incidental meningioma: what has happened in 10 years? |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10689551/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37938444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11060-023-04482-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT naslundolivia incidencemanagementandoutcomeofincidentalmeningiomawhathashappenedin10years AT strandpersveino incidencemanagementandoutcomeofincidentalmeningiomawhathashappenedin10years AT solheimole incidencemanagementandoutcomeofincidentalmeningiomawhathashappenedin10years AT almasrimohammad incidencemanagementandoutcomeofincidentalmeningiomawhathashappenedin10years AT rapiokizeva incidencemanagementandoutcomeofincidentalmeningiomawhathashappenedin10years AT thurinerik incidencemanagementandoutcomeofincidentalmeningiomawhathashappenedin10years AT jakolaasgeirs incidencemanagementandoutcomeofincidentalmeningiomawhathashappenedin10years |