Cargando…

Evaluation of the accuracy of implant placement by using implant positional guide versus freehand: a prospective clinical study

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to examine and compare the accuracy of implant placement using implant positional guide and freehand. METHODS: 48 implants were placed in patients with single tooth loss with implant positional guide and freehand, respectively. The accuracy of implant placement was...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Lixuan, Liu, Linfeng, Yang, Shengtao, Khadka, Prapti, Zhang, Shiwen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10689697/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38036932
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-023-00512-z
_version_ 1785152406831497216
author Huang, Lixuan
Liu, Linfeng
Yang, Shengtao
Khadka, Prapti
Zhang, Shiwen
author_facet Huang, Lixuan
Liu, Linfeng
Yang, Shengtao
Khadka, Prapti
Zhang, Shiwen
author_sort Huang, Lixuan
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to examine and compare the accuracy of implant placement using implant positional guide and freehand. METHODS: 48 implants were placed in patients with single tooth loss with implant positional guide and freehand, respectively. The accuracy of implant placement was assessed by comparing the actual and planned position, including four parameters: coronal deviation, apical deviation, angular deviation, and vertical deviation. RESULTS: Comparing all the variables, it has been found that the implant positional guide is more accurate than the freehand. All parameters describing in the deviation were significantly lower in the implant positional guide group than the freehand. CONCLUSIONS: The implant positional guide can act as a practicable tool for dental implant surgery. It is a promising technology that guarantees low cost and high precision in implant surgery. However, based on the restricted evidence from clinical studies, longer follow-up periods, larger population studies, and standardized experimental studies are required. Trial registration CHICTR, ChiCTR2300071024. Registered 28 April 2023—CHICTR, ChiCTR2300071024. Registered 28 April 2023—Retrospectively registered, https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=195424.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10689697
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106896972023-12-02 Evaluation of the accuracy of implant placement by using implant positional guide versus freehand: a prospective clinical study Huang, Lixuan Liu, Linfeng Yang, Shengtao Khadka, Prapti Zhang, Shiwen Int J Implant Dent Research PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to examine and compare the accuracy of implant placement using implant positional guide and freehand. METHODS: 48 implants were placed in patients with single tooth loss with implant positional guide and freehand, respectively. The accuracy of implant placement was assessed by comparing the actual and planned position, including four parameters: coronal deviation, apical deviation, angular deviation, and vertical deviation. RESULTS: Comparing all the variables, it has been found that the implant positional guide is more accurate than the freehand. All parameters describing in the deviation were significantly lower in the implant positional guide group than the freehand. CONCLUSIONS: The implant positional guide can act as a practicable tool for dental implant surgery. It is a promising technology that guarantees low cost and high precision in implant surgery. However, based on the restricted evidence from clinical studies, longer follow-up periods, larger population studies, and standardized experimental studies are required. Trial registration CHICTR, ChiCTR2300071024. Registered 28 April 2023—CHICTR, ChiCTR2300071024. Registered 28 April 2023—Retrospectively registered, https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=195424. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10689697/ /pubmed/38036932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-023-00512-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Huang, Lixuan
Liu, Linfeng
Yang, Shengtao
Khadka, Prapti
Zhang, Shiwen
Evaluation of the accuracy of implant placement by using implant positional guide versus freehand: a prospective clinical study
title Evaluation of the accuracy of implant placement by using implant positional guide versus freehand: a prospective clinical study
title_full Evaluation of the accuracy of implant placement by using implant positional guide versus freehand: a prospective clinical study
title_fullStr Evaluation of the accuracy of implant placement by using implant positional guide versus freehand: a prospective clinical study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the accuracy of implant placement by using implant positional guide versus freehand: a prospective clinical study
title_short Evaluation of the accuracy of implant placement by using implant positional guide versus freehand: a prospective clinical study
title_sort evaluation of the accuracy of implant placement by using implant positional guide versus freehand: a prospective clinical study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10689697/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38036932
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-023-00512-z
work_keys_str_mv AT huanglixuan evaluationoftheaccuracyofimplantplacementbyusingimplantpositionalguideversusfreehandaprospectiveclinicalstudy
AT liulinfeng evaluationoftheaccuracyofimplantplacementbyusingimplantpositionalguideversusfreehandaprospectiveclinicalstudy
AT yangshengtao evaluationoftheaccuracyofimplantplacementbyusingimplantpositionalguideversusfreehandaprospectiveclinicalstudy
AT khadkaprapti evaluationoftheaccuracyofimplantplacementbyusingimplantpositionalguideversusfreehandaprospectiveclinicalstudy
AT zhangshiwen evaluationoftheaccuracyofimplantplacementbyusingimplantpositionalguideversusfreehandaprospectiveclinicalstudy