Cargando…

Could twinkling artifact be a parameter in predicting the success of shock wave lithotripsy? A prospective study

INTRODUCTION: It is important to predict success before the treatment of urolithiasis. We aimed to predict the success of shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) by comparing twinkling artifact (TA) revealed through colour Doppler ultrasonography (CDUS) with stone density in non-contrast computed tomography (N...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sevim, Mehmet, Alkis, Okan, Kartal, İbrahim Güven, Kazan, Huseyin Ozgur, Sonmez, Oguzhan Yusuf, Korkmaz, Mehmet, Aras, Bekir
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Polish Urological Association 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10690377/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38045786
http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2023.20
_version_ 1785152512654835712
author Sevim, Mehmet
Alkis, Okan
Kartal, İbrahim Güven
Kazan, Huseyin Ozgur
Sonmez, Oguzhan Yusuf
Korkmaz, Mehmet
Aras, Bekir
author_facet Sevim, Mehmet
Alkis, Okan
Kartal, İbrahim Güven
Kazan, Huseyin Ozgur
Sonmez, Oguzhan Yusuf
Korkmaz, Mehmet
Aras, Bekir
author_sort Sevim, Mehmet
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: It is important to predict success before the treatment of urolithiasis. We aimed to predict the success of shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) by comparing twinkling artifact (TA) revealed through colour Doppler ultrasonography (CDUS) with stone density in non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eighty patients who underwent SWL between January 2021 and January 2022 were included in the study. Patients with stones of 5–20 mm in the renal pelvis and proximal ureter at NCCT were included. Patients’ demographics, Hounsfield units (HU) in NCCT, and TA grades in CDUS were recorded. The stone-free rate after SWL, additional treatments, overall success rates, and the association between TA and success rates were evaluated. RESULTS: The mean age was 47.41 ±15.08 years. The mean BMI was 24.49 ±3.67 kg/m(2). Twenty-three (28.8%) patients were TA grade 0, 33 (41.2%) patients were grade 1, and 24 (30%) were grade 2. The mean HU of TA grades 0, 1, and 2 of stones were 628 ±107, 864 ±123, and 1166 ±292, respectively. The HU increased along with the increase in the TA grade of the stone (p <0.01). The mean number of SWL sessions was 2.26 ±0.75 in patients with TA grade 0, and 2.92 ±0.40 in patients with TA grade 2. The mean number of SWL sessions increased along with the increase in TA grade (p <0.01). The stone-free rate decreased as the TA grade increased. Stone diameter and TA were the only predictors of SWL success. CONCLUSIONS: We think that TA may be useful in predicting SWL success.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10690377
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Polish Urological Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106903772023-12-02 Could twinkling artifact be a parameter in predicting the success of shock wave lithotripsy? A prospective study Sevim, Mehmet Alkis, Okan Kartal, İbrahim Güven Kazan, Huseyin Ozgur Sonmez, Oguzhan Yusuf Korkmaz, Mehmet Aras, Bekir Cent European J Urol Original Paper INTRODUCTION: It is important to predict success before the treatment of urolithiasis. We aimed to predict the success of shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) by comparing twinkling artifact (TA) revealed through colour Doppler ultrasonography (CDUS) with stone density in non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eighty patients who underwent SWL between January 2021 and January 2022 were included in the study. Patients with stones of 5–20 mm in the renal pelvis and proximal ureter at NCCT were included. Patients’ demographics, Hounsfield units (HU) in NCCT, and TA grades in CDUS were recorded. The stone-free rate after SWL, additional treatments, overall success rates, and the association between TA and success rates were evaluated. RESULTS: The mean age was 47.41 ±15.08 years. The mean BMI was 24.49 ±3.67 kg/m(2). Twenty-three (28.8%) patients were TA grade 0, 33 (41.2%) patients were grade 1, and 24 (30%) were grade 2. The mean HU of TA grades 0, 1, and 2 of stones were 628 ±107, 864 ±123, and 1166 ±292, respectively. The HU increased along with the increase in the TA grade of the stone (p <0.01). The mean number of SWL sessions was 2.26 ±0.75 in patients with TA grade 0, and 2.92 ±0.40 in patients with TA grade 2. The mean number of SWL sessions increased along with the increase in TA grade (p <0.01). The stone-free rate decreased as the TA grade increased. Stone diameter and TA were the only predictors of SWL success. CONCLUSIONS: We think that TA may be useful in predicting SWL success. Polish Urological Association 2023-08-26 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10690377/ /pubmed/38045786 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2023.20 Text en Copyright by Polish Urological Association https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Sevim, Mehmet
Alkis, Okan
Kartal, İbrahim Güven
Kazan, Huseyin Ozgur
Sonmez, Oguzhan Yusuf
Korkmaz, Mehmet
Aras, Bekir
Could twinkling artifact be a parameter in predicting the success of shock wave lithotripsy? A prospective study
title Could twinkling artifact be a parameter in predicting the success of shock wave lithotripsy? A prospective study
title_full Could twinkling artifact be a parameter in predicting the success of shock wave lithotripsy? A prospective study
title_fullStr Could twinkling artifact be a parameter in predicting the success of shock wave lithotripsy? A prospective study
title_full_unstemmed Could twinkling artifact be a parameter in predicting the success of shock wave lithotripsy? A prospective study
title_short Could twinkling artifact be a parameter in predicting the success of shock wave lithotripsy? A prospective study
title_sort could twinkling artifact be a parameter in predicting the success of shock wave lithotripsy? a prospective study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10690377/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38045786
http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2023.20
work_keys_str_mv AT sevimmehmet couldtwinklingartifactbeaparameterinpredictingthesuccessofshockwavelithotripsyaprospectivestudy
AT alkisokan couldtwinklingartifactbeaparameterinpredictingthesuccessofshockwavelithotripsyaprospectivestudy
AT kartalibrahimguven couldtwinklingartifactbeaparameterinpredictingthesuccessofshockwavelithotripsyaprospectivestudy
AT kazanhuseyinozgur couldtwinklingartifactbeaparameterinpredictingthesuccessofshockwavelithotripsyaprospectivestudy
AT sonmezoguzhanyusuf couldtwinklingartifactbeaparameterinpredictingthesuccessofshockwavelithotripsyaprospectivestudy
AT korkmazmehmet couldtwinklingartifactbeaparameterinpredictingthesuccessofshockwavelithotripsyaprospectivestudy
AT arasbekir couldtwinklingartifactbeaparameterinpredictingthesuccessofshockwavelithotripsyaprospectivestudy