Cargando…
Could twinkling artifact be a parameter in predicting the success of shock wave lithotripsy? A prospective study
INTRODUCTION: It is important to predict success before the treatment of urolithiasis. We aimed to predict the success of shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) by comparing twinkling artifact (TA) revealed through colour Doppler ultrasonography (CDUS) with stone density in non-contrast computed tomography (N...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Polish Urological Association
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10690377/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38045786 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2023.20 |
_version_ | 1785152512654835712 |
---|---|
author | Sevim, Mehmet Alkis, Okan Kartal, İbrahim Güven Kazan, Huseyin Ozgur Sonmez, Oguzhan Yusuf Korkmaz, Mehmet Aras, Bekir |
author_facet | Sevim, Mehmet Alkis, Okan Kartal, İbrahim Güven Kazan, Huseyin Ozgur Sonmez, Oguzhan Yusuf Korkmaz, Mehmet Aras, Bekir |
author_sort | Sevim, Mehmet |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: It is important to predict success before the treatment of urolithiasis. We aimed to predict the success of shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) by comparing twinkling artifact (TA) revealed through colour Doppler ultrasonography (CDUS) with stone density in non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eighty patients who underwent SWL between January 2021 and January 2022 were included in the study. Patients with stones of 5–20 mm in the renal pelvis and proximal ureter at NCCT were included. Patients’ demographics, Hounsfield units (HU) in NCCT, and TA grades in CDUS were recorded. The stone-free rate after SWL, additional treatments, overall success rates, and the association between TA and success rates were evaluated. RESULTS: The mean age was 47.41 ±15.08 years. The mean BMI was 24.49 ±3.67 kg/m(2). Twenty-three (28.8%) patients were TA grade 0, 33 (41.2%) patients were grade 1, and 24 (30%) were grade 2. The mean HU of TA grades 0, 1, and 2 of stones were 628 ±107, 864 ±123, and 1166 ±292, respectively. The HU increased along with the increase in the TA grade of the stone (p <0.01). The mean number of SWL sessions was 2.26 ±0.75 in patients with TA grade 0, and 2.92 ±0.40 in patients with TA grade 2. The mean number of SWL sessions increased along with the increase in TA grade (p <0.01). The stone-free rate decreased as the TA grade increased. Stone diameter and TA were the only predictors of SWL success. CONCLUSIONS: We think that TA may be useful in predicting SWL success. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10690377 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Polish Urological Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106903772023-12-02 Could twinkling artifact be a parameter in predicting the success of shock wave lithotripsy? A prospective study Sevim, Mehmet Alkis, Okan Kartal, İbrahim Güven Kazan, Huseyin Ozgur Sonmez, Oguzhan Yusuf Korkmaz, Mehmet Aras, Bekir Cent European J Urol Original Paper INTRODUCTION: It is important to predict success before the treatment of urolithiasis. We aimed to predict the success of shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) by comparing twinkling artifact (TA) revealed through colour Doppler ultrasonography (CDUS) with stone density in non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eighty patients who underwent SWL between January 2021 and January 2022 were included in the study. Patients with stones of 5–20 mm in the renal pelvis and proximal ureter at NCCT were included. Patients’ demographics, Hounsfield units (HU) in NCCT, and TA grades in CDUS were recorded. The stone-free rate after SWL, additional treatments, overall success rates, and the association between TA and success rates were evaluated. RESULTS: The mean age was 47.41 ±15.08 years. The mean BMI was 24.49 ±3.67 kg/m(2). Twenty-three (28.8%) patients were TA grade 0, 33 (41.2%) patients were grade 1, and 24 (30%) were grade 2. The mean HU of TA grades 0, 1, and 2 of stones were 628 ±107, 864 ±123, and 1166 ±292, respectively. The HU increased along with the increase in the TA grade of the stone (p <0.01). The mean number of SWL sessions was 2.26 ±0.75 in patients with TA grade 0, and 2.92 ±0.40 in patients with TA grade 2. The mean number of SWL sessions increased along with the increase in TA grade (p <0.01). The stone-free rate decreased as the TA grade increased. Stone diameter and TA were the only predictors of SWL success. CONCLUSIONS: We think that TA may be useful in predicting SWL success. Polish Urological Association 2023-08-26 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10690377/ /pubmed/38045786 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2023.20 Text en Copyright by Polish Urological Association https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Sevim, Mehmet Alkis, Okan Kartal, İbrahim Güven Kazan, Huseyin Ozgur Sonmez, Oguzhan Yusuf Korkmaz, Mehmet Aras, Bekir Could twinkling artifact be a parameter in predicting the success of shock wave lithotripsy? A prospective study |
title | Could twinkling artifact be a parameter in predicting the success of shock wave lithotripsy? A prospective study |
title_full | Could twinkling artifact be a parameter in predicting the success of shock wave lithotripsy? A prospective study |
title_fullStr | Could twinkling artifact be a parameter in predicting the success of shock wave lithotripsy? A prospective study |
title_full_unstemmed | Could twinkling artifact be a parameter in predicting the success of shock wave lithotripsy? A prospective study |
title_short | Could twinkling artifact be a parameter in predicting the success of shock wave lithotripsy? A prospective study |
title_sort | could twinkling artifact be a parameter in predicting the success of shock wave lithotripsy? a prospective study |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10690377/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38045786 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2023.20 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sevimmehmet couldtwinklingartifactbeaparameterinpredictingthesuccessofshockwavelithotripsyaprospectivestudy AT alkisokan couldtwinklingartifactbeaparameterinpredictingthesuccessofshockwavelithotripsyaprospectivestudy AT kartalibrahimguven couldtwinklingartifactbeaparameterinpredictingthesuccessofshockwavelithotripsyaprospectivestudy AT kazanhuseyinozgur couldtwinklingartifactbeaparameterinpredictingthesuccessofshockwavelithotripsyaprospectivestudy AT sonmezoguzhanyusuf couldtwinklingartifactbeaparameterinpredictingthesuccessofshockwavelithotripsyaprospectivestudy AT korkmazmehmet couldtwinklingartifactbeaparameterinpredictingthesuccessofshockwavelithotripsyaprospectivestudy AT arasbekir couldtwinklingartifactbeaparameterinpredictingthesuccessofshockwavelithotripsyaprospectivestudy |