Location of ureteral access sheath in the ureter. Does it affect the fluid flow in different calyces?

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate outflow variation in different locations of the pyelocaliceal system with the use of different ureteral access sheath (UAS) sizes and different UAS positioning. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The experimental setup included an anaesthetised porcine model, a 7.5-Fr ureteroscope with a 200-μm laser fibre inserted in the working channel, a hand-held pumping irrigating system, and UAS of different sizes, namely: 9.5/11.5 Fr, 12/14 Fr, and 14/16 Fr. Each UAS was placed just below the ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) or in the mid-ureter. The ureteroscope was placed in the renal pelvis, upper and lower calyces, and outflow measurements were obtained with 3-second interval pumping for one minute in every experimental setup. RESULTS: The UAS positioning in the mid-ureter was associated with significantly higher outflow rates in the lower calyx (p = 0.041). While the UAS was below the UPJ, we observed a trend of lower outflow rate in the lower calyx, which was completely inverted when the UAS was in the mid-ureter. Increasing the UAS size from 9.5/11.5 Fr to 12/14 Fr led to a significant increase in outflow in the renal pelvis and upper calyx (p = 0.007), but not in the lower calyx. A further increase to 14/16 Fr did not produce increased flow. CONCLUSIONS: Different locations of the pyelocaliceal system have different fluid mechanics during fURS. In the renal pelvis and upper calyx increasing the diameter of the UAS improved the outflow, whereas in the lower calyx the position of the UAS seems to be the most relevant factor. These variables should be considered when performing fURS, especially with high-power laser lithotripsy.