Cargando…

Surgical outcomes of low-power thulium laser enucleation of prostates >80 g. One-year of follow-up

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of low-power thulium (30 W) and the duration necessary to eliminate adenomas at the level of the surgical capsule, as well as its impact on postoperative urinary and sexual function. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with symptomatic b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morsy, Samer, Kamal, Islam, Meshref, Alaa, Abdel-Mohsen, Mostafa, Abdel-Hakim, Mahmoud, Yehia, Ahmed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Polish Urological Association 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10690385/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38045774
http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2023.50
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of low-power thulium (30 W) and the duration necessary to eliminate adenomas at the level of the surgical capsule, as well as its impact on postoperative urinary and sexual function. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), who had ThuLEP between December 2019 and March 2022 and had a prostate size >80 mL and had not responded to the medication therapy, were included. The prostate size, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), enucleation and morcellation times, postoperative International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), and International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IEFF-5) records at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months were among the information gathered. RESULTS: The average age of the 80 patients who received ThuLEP was 66.7 ±6.4 years, with a mean prostate volume of 112.65 ±19.3 mL. The mean duration for enucleation was 71 ±11 min. At the initial follow-up after one month, the mean IPSS was 8.012 ±1.78 mL and the mean Q(max) enhancement was 30.16 ±4 mL s(-1). In contrast to baseline, our findings demonstrated a substantial improvement in postoperative urgency and urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) (p = 0.005) but no meaningful variation in IIEF-5 score at the 12-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Low-power ThuLEP is worthwhile for therapeutic use because it effectively treats patients with large prostates with satisfactory urinary and sexual effects. Clinical trials .gov ID: NCT05494944