Cargando…

Surgical outcomes of low-power thulium laser enucleation of prostates >80 g. One-year of follow-up

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of low-power thulium (30 W) and the duration necessary to eliminate adenomas at the level of the surgical capsule, as well as its impact on postoperative urinary and sexual function. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with symptomatic b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morsy, Samer, Kamal, Islam, Meshref, Alaa, Abdel-Mohsen, Mostafa, Abdel-Hakim, Mahmoud, Yehia, Ahmed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Polish Urological Association 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10690385/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38045774
http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2023.50
_version_ 1785152514592604160
author Morsy, Samer
Kamal, Islam
Meshref, Alaa
Abdel-Mohsen, Mostafa
Abdel-Hakim, Mahmoud
Yehia, Ahmed
author_facet Morsy, Samer
Kamal, Islam
Meshref, Alaa
Abdel-Mohsen, Mostafa
Abdel-Hakim, Mahmoud
Yehia, Ahmed
author_sort Morsy, Samer
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of low-power thulium (30 W) and the duration necessary to eliminate adenomas at the level of the surgical capsule, as well as its impact on postoperative urinary and sexual function. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), who had ThuLEP between December 2019 and March 2022 and had a prostate size >80 mL and had not responded to the medication therapy, were included. The prostate size, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), enucleation and morcellation times, postoperative International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), and International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IEFF-5) records at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months were among the information gathered. RESULTS: The average age of the 80 patients who received ThuLEP was 66.7 ±6.4 years, with a mean prostate volume of 112.65 ±19.3 mL. The mean duration for enucleation was 71 ±11 min. At the initial follow-up after one month, the mean IPSS was 8.012 ±1.78 mL and the mean Q(max) enhancement was 30.16 ±4 mL s(-1). In contrast to baseline, our findings demonstrated a substantial improvement in postoperative urgency and urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) (p = 0.005) but no meaningful variation in IIEF-5 score at the 12-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Low-power ThuLEP is worthwhile for therapeutic use because it effectively treats patients with large prostates with satisfactory urinary and sexual effects. Clinical trials .gov ID: NCT05494944
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10690385
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Polish Urological Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106903852023-12-02 Surgical outcomes of low-power thulium laser enucleation of prostates >80 g. One-year of follow-up Morsy, Samer Kamal, Islam Meshref, Alaa Abdel-Mohsen, Mostafa Abdel-Hakim, Mahmoud Yehia, Ahmed Cent European J Urol Original Paper INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of low-power thulium (30 W) and the duration necessary to eliminate adenomas at the level of the surgical capsule, as well as its impact on postoperative urinary and sexual function. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), who had ThuLEP between December 2019 and March 2022 and had a prostate size >80 mL and had not responded to the medication therapy, were included. The prostate size, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), enucleation and morcellation times, postoperative International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), and International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IEFF-5) records at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months were among the information gathered. RESULTS: The average age of the 80 patients who received ThuLEP was 66.7 ±6.4 years, with a mean prostate volume of 112.65 ±19.3 mL. The mean duration for enucleation was 71 ±11 min. At the initial follow-up after one month, the mean IPSS was 8.012 ±1.78 mL and the mean Q(max) enhancement was 30.16 ±4 mL s(-1). In contrast to baseline, our findings demonstrated a substantial improvement in postoperative urgency and urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) (p = 0.005) but no meaningful variation in IIEF-5 score at the 12-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Low-power ThuLEP is worthwhile for therapeutic use because it effectively treats patients with large prostates with satisfactory urinary and sexual effects. Clinical trials .gov ID: NCT05494944 Polish Urological Association 2023-07-12 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10690385/ /pubmed/38045774 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2023.50 Text en Copyright by Polish Urological Association https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Morsy, Samer
Kamal, Islam
Meshref, Alaa
Abdel-Mohsen, Mostafa
Abdel-Hakim, Mahmoud
Yehia, Ahmed
Surgical outcomes of low-power thulium laser enucleation of prostates >80 g. One-year of follow-up
title Surgical outcomes of low-power thulium laser enucleation of prostates >80 g. One-year of follow-up
title_full Surgical outcomes of low-power thulium laser enucleation of prostates >80 g. One-year of follow-up
title_fullStr Surgical outcomes of low-power thulium laser enucleation of prostates >80 g. One-year of follow-up
title_full_unstemmed Surgical outcomes of low-power thulium laser enucleation of prostates >80 g. One-year of follow-up
title_short Surgical outcomes of low-power thulium laser enucleation of prostates >80 g. One-year of follow-up
title_sort surgical outcomes of low-power thulium laser enucleation of prostates >80 g. one-year of follow-up
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10690385/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38045774
http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2023.50
work_keys_str_mv AT morsysamer surgicaloutcomesoflowpowerthuliumlaserenucleationofprostates80goneyearoffollowup
AT kamalislam surgicaloutcomesoflowpowerthuliumlaserenucleationofprostates80goneyearoffollowup
AT meshrefalaa surgicaloutcomesoflowpowerthuliumlaserenucleationofprostates80goneyearoffollowup
AT abdelmohsenmostafa surgicaloutcomesoflowpowerthuliumlaserenucleationofprostates80goneyearoffollowup
AT abdelhakimmahmoud surgicaloutcomesoflowpowerthuliumlaserenucleationofprostates80goneyearoffollowup
AT yehiaahmed surgicaloutcomesoflowpowerthuliumlaserenucleationofprostates80goneyearoffollowup