Cargando…
Report of the ILAE SUDEP Task Force on national recommendations and practices around the world regarding the use of wearable seizure detection devices: A global survey
Wearable seizure detection devices have the potential to address unmet needs of people with epilepsy. A recently published evidence‐based international guideline recommends using such devices for safety indications in patients with tonic–clonic seizures (TCS). Our objective was to map existing guide...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10690692/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37567865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/epi4.12801 |
_version_ | 1785152576953516032 |
---|---|
author | Zelano, Johan Beniczky, Sandor Ryvlin, Philippe Surges, Rainer Tomson, Torbjörn |
author_facet | Zelano, Johan Beniczky, Sandor Ryvlin, Philippe Surges, Rainer Tomson, Torbjörn |
author_sort | Zelano, Johan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Wearable seizure detection devices have the potential to address unmet needs of people with epilepsy. A recently published evidence‐based international guideline recommends using such devices for safety indications in patients with tonic–clonic seizures (TCS). Our objective was to map existing guidelines and clinical practices at national level. We conducted a survey of the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) chapters regarding national recommendations and practical circumstances for prescribing seizure detection devices, and another survey of physicians in the ILAE constituency anywhere in the world, concerning their views and practices regarding recommendations for and prescription of such devices. Fifty‐eight ILAE chapters (response rate 48%) and 157 physicians completed the surveys. More than two‐thirds of responding countries do not have standards on wearables for seizure detection, although they indicated availability of such devices. The most often recognized indications were safety and objective seizure quantification. In nearly half of countries, devices are purchased by patients or caregivers, and either lack a uniform reimbursement scheme (41%) or patients pay the full cost for the device (48%). Tonic–clonic seizure frequency, nocturnal seizures, and previous injuries were the main factors that influenced the surveyed physicians to recommend wearable seizure detection devices. Our results document the need to implement international clinical practice guidelines at national level and to consider these when deciding upon reimbursement of seizure detection devices. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10690692 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106906922023-12-02 Report of the ILAE SUDEP Task Force on national recommendations and practices around the world regarding the use of wearable seizure detection devices: A global survey Zelano, Johan Beniczky, Sandor Ryvlin, Philippe Surges, Rainer Tomson, Torbjörn Epilepsia Open Special Report Wearable seizure detection devices have the potential to address unmet needs of people with epilepsy. A recently published evidence‐based international guideline recommends using such devices for safety indications in patients with tonic–clonic seizures (TCS). Our objective was to map existing guidelines and clinical practices at national level. We conducted a survey of the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) chapters regarding national recommendations and practical circumstances for prescribing seizure detection devices, and another survey of physicians in the ILAE constituency anywhere in the world, concerning their views and practices regarding recommendations for and prescription of such devices. Fifty‐eight ILAE chapters (response rate 48%) and 157 physicians completed the surveys. More than two‐thirds of responding countries do not have standards on wearables for seizure detection, although they indicated availability of such devices. The most often recognized indications were safety and objective seizure quantification. In nearly half of countries, devices are purchased by patients or caregivers, and either lack a uniform reimbursement scheme (41%) or patients pay the full cost for the device (48%). Tonic–clonic seizure frequency, nocturnal seizures, and previous injuries were the main factors that influenced the surveyed physicians to recommend wearable seizure detection devices. Our results document the need to implement international clinical practice guidelines at national level and to consider these when deciding upon reimbursement of seizure detection devices. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10690692/ /pubmed/37567865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/epi4.12801 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Epilepsia Open published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International League Against Epilepsy. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Special Report Zelano, Johan Beniczky, Sandor Ryvlin, Philippe Surges, Rainer Tomson, Torbjörn Report of the ILAE SUDEP Task Force on national recommendations and practices around the world regarding the use of wearable seizure detection devices: A global survey |
title | Report of the ILAE SUDEP Task Force on national recommendations and practices around the world regarding the use of wearable seizure detection devices: A global survey |
title_full | Report of the ILAE SUDEP Task Force on national recommendations and practices around the world regarding the use of wearable seizure detection devices: A global survey |
title_fullStr | Report of the ILAE SUDEP Task Force on national recommendations and practices around the world regarding the use of wearable seizure detection devices: A global survey |
title_full_unstemmed | Report of the ILAE SUDEP Task Force on national recommendations and practices around the world regarding the use of wearable seizure detection devices: A global survey |
title_short | Report of the ILAE SUDEP Task Force on national recommendations and practices around the world regarding the use of wearable seizure detection devices: A global survey |
title_sort | report of the ilae sudep task force on national recommendations and practices around the world regarding the use of wearable seizure detection devices: a global survey |
topic | Special Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10690692/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37567865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/epi4.12801 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zelanojohan reportoftheilaesudeptaskforceonnationalrecommendationsandpracticesaroundtheworldregardingtheuseofwearableseizuredetectiondevicesaglobalsurvey AT beniczkysandor reportoftheilaesudeptaskforceonnationalrecommendationsandpracticesaroundtheworldregardingtheuseofwearableseizuredetectiondevicesaglobalsurvey AT ryvlinphilippe reportoftheilaesudeptaskforceonnationalrecommendationsandpracticesaroundtheworldregardingtheuseofwearableseizuredetectiondevicesaglobalsurvey AT surgesrainer reportoftheilaesudeptaskforceonnationalrecommendationsandpracticesaroundtheworldregardingtheuseofwearableseizuredetectiondevicesaglobalsurvey AT tomsontorbjorn reportoftheilaesudeptaskforceonnationalrecommendationsandpracticesaroundtheworldregardingtheuseofwearableseizuredetectiondevicesaglobalsurvey AT reportoftheilaesudeptaskforceonnationalrecommendationsandpracticesaroundtheworldregardingtheuseofwearableseizuredetectiondevicesaglobalsurvey |