Cargando…
The use of checklists in the intensive care unit: a scoping review
BACKGROUND: Despite the extensive volume of research published on checklists in the intensive care unit (ICU), no review has been published on the broader role of checklists within the intensive care unit, their implementation and validation, and the recommended clinical context for their use. Accor...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10691022/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38037056 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04758-2 |
_version_ | 1785152650879172608 |
---|---|
author | Erikson, Ethan J. Edelman, Daniel A. Brewster, Fiona M. Marshall, Stuart D. Turner, Maryann C. Sarode, Vineet V. Brewster, David J. |
author_facet | Erikson, Ethan J. Edelman, Daniel A. Brewster, Fiona M. Marshall, Stuart D. Turner, Maryann C. Sarode, Vineet V. Brewster, David J. |
author_sort | Erikson, Ethan J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Despite the extensive volume of research published on checklists in the intensive care unit (ICU), no review has been published on the broader role of checklists within the intensive care unit, their implementation and validation, and the recommended clinical context for their use. Accordingly, a scoping review was necessary to map the current literature and to guide future research on intensive care checklists. This review focuses on what checklists are currently used, how they are used, process of checklist development and implementation, and outcomes associated with checklist use. METHODS: A systematic search of MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases was conducted, followed by a grey literature search. The abstracts of the identified studies were screened. Full texts of relevant articles were reviewed, and the references of included studies were subsequently screened for additional relevant articles. Details of the study characteristics, study design, checklist intervention, and outcomes were extracted. RESULTS: Our search yielded 2046 studies, of which 167 were selected for further analysis. Checklists identified in these studies were categorised into the following types: rounding checklists; delirium screening checklists; transfer and handover checklists; central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) prevention checklists; airway management checklists; and other. Of 72 significant clinical outcomes reported, 65 were positive, five were negative, and two were mixed. Of 122 significant process of care outcomes reported, 114 were positive and eight were negative. CONCLUSIONS: Checklists are commonly used in the intensive care unit and appear in many clinical guidelines. Delirium screening checklists and rounding checklists are well implemented and validated in the literature. Clinical and process of care outcomes associated with checklist use are predominantly positive. Future research on checklists in the intensive care unit should focus on establishing clinical guidelines for checklist types and processes for ongoing modification and improvements using post-intervention data. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13054-023-04758-2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10691022 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106910222023-12-02 The use of checklists in the intensive care unit: a scoping review Erikson, Ethan J. Edelman, Daniel A. Brewster, Fiona M. Marshall, Stuart D. Turner, Maryann C. Sarode, Vineet V. Brewster, David J. Crit Care Review BACKGROUND: Despite the extensive volume of research published on checklists in the intensive care unit (ICU), no review has been published on the broader role of checklists within the intensive care unit, their implementation and validation, and the recommended clinical context for their use. Accordingly, a scoping review was necessary to map the current literature and to guide future research on intensive care checklists. This review focuses on what checklists are currently used, how they are used, process of checklist development and implementation, and outcomes associated with checklist use. METHODS: A systematic search of MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases was conducted, followed by a grey literature search. The abstracts of the identified studies were screened. Full texts of relevant articles were reviewed, and the references of included studies were subsequently screened for additional relevant articles. Details of the study characteristics, study design, checklist intervention, and outcomes were extracted. RESULTS: Our search yielded 2046 studies, of which 167 were selected for further analysis. Checklists identified in these studies were categorised into the following types: rounding checklists; delirium screening checklists; transfer and handover checklists; central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) prevention checklists; airway management checklists; and other. Of 72 significant clinical outcomes reported, 65 were positive, five were negative, and two were mixed. Of 122 significant process of care outcomes reported, 114 were positive and eight were negative. CONCLUSIONS: Checklists are commonly used in the intensive care unit and appear in many clinical guidelines. Delirium screening checklists and rounding checklists are well implemented and validated in the literature. Clinical and process of care outcomes associated with checklist use are predominantly positive. Future research on checklists in the intensive care unit should focus on establishing clinical guidelines for checklist types and processes for ongoing modification and improvements using post-intervention data. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13054-023-04758-2. BioMed Central 2023-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10691022/ /pubmed/38037056 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04758-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Review Erikson, Ethan J. Edelman, Daniel A. Brewster, Fiona M. Marshall, Stuart D. Turner, Maryann C. Sarode, Vineet V. Brewster, David J. The use of checklists in the intensive care unit: a scoping review |
title | The use of checklists in the intensive care unit: a scoping review |
title_full | The use of checklists in the intensive care unit: a scoping review |
title_fullStr | The use of checklists in the intensive care unit: a scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | The use of checklists in the intensive care unit: a scoping review |
title_short | The use of checklists in the intensive care unit: a scoping review |
title_sort | use of checklists in the intensive care unit: a scoping review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10691022/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38037056 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04758-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT eriksonethanj theuseofchecklistsintheintensivecareunitascopingreview AT edelmandaniela theuseofchecklistsintheintensivecareunitascopingreview AT brewsterfionam theuseofchecklistsintheintensivecareunitascopingreview AT marshallstuartd theuseofchecklistsintheintensivecareunitascopingreview AT turnermaryannc theuseofchecklistsintheintensivecareunitascopingreview AT sarodevineetv theuseofchecklistsintheintensivecareunitascopingreview AT brewsterdavidj theuseofchecklistsintheintensivecareunitascopingreview AT eriksonethanj useofchecklistsintheintensivecareunitascopingreview AT edelmandaniela useofchecklistsintheintensivecareunitascopingreview AT brewsterfionam useofchecklistsintheintensivecareunitascopingreview AT marshallstuartd useofchecklistsintheintensivecareunitascopingreview AT turnermaryannc useofchecklistsintheintensivecareunitascopingreview AT sarodevineetv useofchecklistsintheintensivecareunitascopingreview AT brewsterdavidj useofchecklistsintheintensivecareunitascopingreview |