Cargando…
Patient involvement in research within the Gynecological Cancer InterGroup: A call to action for a systematic approach: Results from a survey
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Involving patients in research, not only as trial subjects, is not a newly established practice. Over the last two decades, patient roles have gradually expanded to become active research contributors, creating a more patient‐centered research landscape. Our survey has explored...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10691166/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38045625 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.1735 |
_version_ | 1785152686177386496 |
---|---|
author | Nohová, Ivana Andrews, John Votan, Bénédicte Miller, Austin Sehouli, Jalid Berger, Regina |
author_facet | Nohová, Ivana Andrews, John Votan, Bénédicte Miller, Austin Sehouli, Jalid Berger, Regina |
author_sort | Nohová, Ivana |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Involving patients in research, not only as trial subjects, is not a newly established practice. Over the last two decades, patient roles have gradually expanded to become active research contributors, creating a more patient‐centered research landscape. Our survey has explored the scope of patient involvement within the Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG), an International Gynecologic Cancer Research Consortium, and identified challenges in developing a systematic, meaningful and sustainable level of patient involvement. METHODS: In late 2019, the GCIG Harmonisation Operations Committee conducted an online survey across 26 national and/or international research cooperative groups, aiming to identify current patient involvement practices implemented by each group. Twelve questions were asked. The results have been generated to support a systematic strategic planning process to increase patient involvement into clinical research projects. RESULTS: More than half of the 26 participating groups have either already involved (15, [58%]) or are planning (6, [23%]) to involve patients in their research activities. Gaining patient support in raising public awareness around clinical trials appears to be one of the most desired benefits (21, [81%]). Ten respondents managed to integrate patient involvement into their standard practice. When involving patients in research the groups mostly consider that patients bring added value to the study (19, [73%]), although only eight groups (40%) have a well‐organized process in doing so. CONCLUSION: Even though patient involvement is considered a significant added value to clinical research, its application within GCIG groups is not considered on a regular basis and is predominantly limited to operational aspects of research activities. The lack of resources and expertize, as well as the missing well‐organized and structured process of some groups, combined with their ability to ensure process sustainability, are among the main factors affecting implementation and adoption of patient involvement within GCIG research activities. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10691166 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106911662023-12-02 Patient involvement in research within the Gynecological Cancer InterGroup: A call to action for a systematic approach: Results from a survey Nohová, Ivana Andrews, John Votan, Bénédicte Miller, Austin Sehouli, Jalid Berger, Regina Health Sci Rep Original Research BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Involving patients in research, not only as trial subjects, is not a newly established practice. Over the last two decades, patient roles have gradually expanded to become active research contributors, creating a more patient‐centered research landscape. Our survey has explored the scope of patient involvement within the Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG), an International Gynecologic Cancer Research Consortium, and identified challenges in developing a systematic, meaningful and sustainable level of patient involvement. METHODS: In late 2019, the GCIG Harmonisation Operations Committee conducted an online survey across 26 national and/or international research cooperative groups, aiming to identify current patient involvement practices implemented by each group. Twelve questions were asked. The results have been generated to support a systematic strategic planning process to increase patient involvement into clinical research projects. RESULTS: More than half of the 26 participating groups have either already involved (15, [58%]) or are planning (6, [23%]) to involve patients in their research activities. Gaining patient support in raising public awareness around clinical trials appears to be one of the most desired benefits (21, [81%]). Ten respondents managed to integrate patient involvement into their standard practice. When involving patients in research the groups mostly consider that patients bring added value to the study (19, [73%]), although only eight groups (40%) have a well‐organized process in doing so. CONCLUSION: Even though patient involvement is considered a significant added value to clinical research, its application within GCIG groups is not considered on a regular basis and is predominantly limited to operational aspects of research activities. The lack of resources and expertize, as well as the missing well‐organized and structured process of some groups, combined with their ability to ensure process sustainability, are among the main factors affecting implementation and adoption of patient involvement within GCIG research activities. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10691166/ /pubmed/38045625 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.1735 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Health Science Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Nohová, Ivana Andrews, John Votan, Bénédicte Miller, Austin Sehouli, Jalid Berger, Regina Patient involvement in research within the Gynecological Cancer InterGroup: A call to action for a systematic approach: Results from a survey |
title | Patient involvement in research within the Gynecological Cancer InterGroup: A call to action for a systematic approach: Results from a survey |
title_full | Patient involvement in research within the Gynecological Cancer InterGroup: A call to action for a systematic approach: Results from a survey |
title_fullStr | Patient involvement in research within the Gynecological Cancer InterGroup: A call to action for a systematic approach: Results from a survey |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient involvement in research within the Gynecological Cancer InterGroup: A call to action for a systematic approach: Results from a survey |
title_short | Patient involvement in research within the Gynecological Cancer InterGroup: A call to action for a systematic approach: Results from a survey |
title_sort | patient involvement in research within the gynecological cancer intergroup: a call to action for a systematic approach: results from a survey |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10691166/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38045625 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.1735 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nohovaivana patientinvolvementinresearchwithinthegynecologicalcancerintergroupacalltoactionforasystematicapproachresultsfromasurvey AT andrewsjohn patientinvolvementinresearchwithinthegynecologicalcancerintergroupacalltoactionforasystematicapproachresultsfromasurvey AT votanbenedicte patientinvolvementinresearchwithinthegynecologicalcancerintergroupacalltoactionforasystematicapproachresultsfromasurvey AT milleraustin patientinvolvementinresearchwithinthegynecologicalcancerintergroupacalltoactionforasystematicapproachresultsfromasurvey AT sehoulijalid patientinvolvementinresearchwithinthegynecologicalcancerintergroupacalltoactionforasystematicapproachresultsfromasurvey AT bergerregina patientinvolvementinresearchwithinthegynecologicalcancerintergroupacalltoactionforasystematicapproachresultsfromasurvey |