Cargando…

Validation of the geometric equivalent field concept in total scatter factor calculations, for half‐, quarter‐ and off‐isocenter asymmetric square fields

OBJECTIVE: Monitor unit (MU) verification for any symmetric or asymmetric field is performed using a total scatter factor (S(cp)), that is calculated based on the geometric equivalent square field (GESF) concept. In this study, we measured the S(cp) of various asymmetric square fields (ASF(s)) and t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hmodi, Mohammad Samir, Nahili, Majeda, Tsalafoutas, Ioannis A., Saad, Bassam, Hasan, Ali, Anjak, Ousamah, Shamout, Karlos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10691636/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37957949
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.14103
_version_ 1785152776069709824
author Hmodi, Mohammad Samir
Nahili, Majeda
Tsalafoutas, Ioannis A.
Saad, Bassam
Hasan, Ali
Anjak, Ousamah
Shamout, Karlos
author_facet Hmodi, Mohammad Samir
Nahili, Majeda
Tsalafoutas, Ioannis A.
Saad, Bassam
Hasan, Ali
Anjak, Ousamah
Shamout, Karlos
author_sort Hmodi, Mohammad Samir
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Monitor unit (MU) verification for any symmetric or asymmetric field is performed using a total scatter factor (S(cp)), that is calculated based on the geometric equivalent square field (GESF) concept. In this study, we measured the S(cp) of various asymmetric square fields (ASF(s)) and their respective GESFs. METHODS: Square half‐fields (SHF(s)), square quarter‐fields (SQF(s)) and square off‐isocenter fields (SOF(s)), with sizes ranging from 3×3 cm(2) to 20×20 cm(2) were created, by varying the collimator jaws of two Varian iX Linacs (6/18 and 6/23 MV). A semi‐flex ion chamber was used to measure S(cp) at a depth of 10 cm within a water phantom, at the effective field center (EFC) of all ASF(s), and at the isocenter (IC) of their respective GESFs. The later S(cp) values were corrected by the off‐axis ratio [OAR(r)] of the 40×40 cm(2) field size, where r is the distance between EFC and IC. RESULTS: The results show that the S(cp) (EFC) is independent of the type of the ASF (SHF, SQF, or SOF) and no significant difference exists between the 18 and 23 MV beams. Compared with the S(cp) (IC), the S(cp) (EFC) increased with increasing r, by up to 2% and 4% for 18/23 and 6 MV, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The GESF concept provides acceptable accuracy (< 2%) for the calculation of S(cp) of the ASFs used in most clinical situations (except from SOF with EFC at large r), and thus can be used in MU verification calculations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10691636
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106916362023-12-02 Validation of the geometric equivalent field concept in total scatter factor calculations, for half‐, quarter‐ and off‐isocenter asymmetric square fields Hmodi, Mohammad Samir Nahili, Majeda Tsalafoutas, Ioannis A. Saad, Bassam Hasan, Ali Anjak, Ousamah Shamout, Karlos J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics OBJECTIVE: Monitor unit (MU) verification for any symmetric or asymmetric field is performed using a total scatter factor (S(cp)), that is calculated based on the geometric equivalent square field (GESF) concept. In this study, we measured the S(cp) of various asymmetric square fields (ASF(s)) and their respective GESFs. METHODS: Square half‐fields (SHF(s)), square quarter‐fields (SQF(s)) and square off‐isocenter fields (SOF(s)), with sizes ranging from 3×3 cm(2) to 20×20 cm(2) were created, by varying the collimator jaws of two Varian iX Linacs (6/18 and 6/23 MV). A semi‐flex ion chamber was used to measure S(cp) at a depth of 10 cm within a water phantom, at the effective field center (EFC) of all ASF(s), and at the isocenter (IC) of their respective GESFs. The later S(cp) values were corrected by the off‐axis ratio [OAR(r)] of the 40×40 cm(2) field size, where r is the distance between EFC and IC. RESULTS: The results show that the S(cp) (EFC) is independent of the type of the ASF (SHF, SQF, or SOF) and no significant difference exists between the 18 and 23 MV beams. Compared with the S(cp) (IC), the S(cp) (EFC) increased with increasing r, by up to 2% and 4% for 18/23 and 6 MV, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The GESF concept provides acceptable accuracy (< 2%) for the calculation of S(cp) of the ASFs used in most clinical situations (except from SOF with EFC at large r), and thus can be used in MU verification calculations. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10691636/ /pubmed/37957949 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.14103 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Hmodi, Mohammad Samir
Nahili, Majeda
Tsalafoutas, Ioannis A.
Saad, Bassam
Hasan, Ali
Anjak, Ousamah
Shamout, Karlos
Validation of the geometric equivalent field concept in total scatter factor calculations, for half‐, quarter‐ and off‐isocenter asymmetric square fields
title Validation of the geometric equivalent field concept in total scatter factor calculations, for half‐, quarter‐ and off‐isocenter asymmetric square fields
title_full Validation of the geometric equivalent field concept in total scatter factor calculations, for half‐, quarter‐ and off‐isocenter asymmetric square fields
title_fullStr Validation of the geometric equivalent field concept in total scatter factor calculations, for half‐, quarter‐ and off‐isocenter asymmetric square fields
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the geometric equivalent field concept in total scatter factor calculations, for half‐, quarter‐ and off‐isocenter asymmetric square fields
title_short Validation of the geometric equivalent field concept in total scatter factor calculations, for half‐, quarter‐ and off‐isocenter asymmetric square fields
title_sort validation of the geometric equivalent field concept in total scatter factor calculations, for half‐, quarter‐ and off‐isocenter asymmetric square fields
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10691636/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37957949
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.14103
work_keys_str_mv AT hmodimohammadsamir validationofthegeometricequivalentfieldconceptintotalscatterfactorcalculationsforhalfquarterandoffisocenterasymmetricsquarefields
AT nahilimajeda validationofthegeometricequivalentfieldconceptintotalscatterfactorcalculationsforhalfquarterandoffisocenterasymmetricsquarefields
AT tsalafoutasioannisa validationofthegeometricequivalentfieldconceptintotalscatterfactorcalculationsforhalfquarterandoffisocenterasymmetricsquarefields
AT saadbassam validationofthegeometricequivalentfieldconceptintotalscatterfactorcalculationsforhalfquarterandoffisocenterasymmetricsquarefields
AT hasanali validationofthegeometricequivalentfieldconceptintotalscatterfactorcalculationsforhalfquarterandoffisocenterasymmetricsquarefields
AT anjakousamah validationofthegeometricequivalentfieldconceptintotalscatterfactorcalculationsforhalfquarterandoffisocenterasymmetricsquarefields
AT shamoutkarlos validationofthegeometricequivalentfieldconceptintotalscatterfactorcalculationsforhalfquarterandoffisocenterasymmetricsquarefields