Cargando…

Evaluation of Unity 1.5 T MR‐linac plan quality in patients with prostate cancer

The Unity magnetic resonance (MR) linear accelerator (MRL) with MR‐guided adaptive radiotherapy (MRgART) is capable of online MRgART where images are acquired on the treatment day and the radiation treatment plan is immediately replanned and performed. We evaluated the MRgART plan quality and plan r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tanaka, Shohei, Kadoya, Noriyuki, Ishizawa, Miyu, Katsuta, Yoshiyuki, Arai, Kazuhiro, Takahashi, Haruna, Xiao, Yushan, Takahashi, Noriyoshi, Sato, Kiyokazu, Takeda, Ken, Jingu, Keiichi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10691646/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37559561
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.14122
Descripción
Sumario:The Unity magnetic resonance (MR) linear accelerator (MRL) with MR‐guided adaptive radiotherapy (MRgART) is capable of online MRgART where images are acquired on the treatment day and the radiation treatment plan is immediately replanned and performed. We evaluated the MRgART plan quality and plan reproducibility of the Unity MRL in patients with prostate cancer. There were five low‐ or moderate‐risk and five high‐risk patients who received 36.25 Gy or 40 Gy, respectively in five fractions. All patients underwent simulation magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and five online adaptive MRI. We created plans for 5, 7, 9, 16, and 20 beams and for 60, 100, and 150 segments. We evaluated the target and organ doses for different number of beams and segments, respectively. Variation in dose constraint between the simulation plan and online adaptive plan was measured for each patient to assess plan reproducibility. The plan quality improved with the increasing number of beams. However, the proportion of significantly improved dose constraints decreased as the number of beams increased. For some dose parameters, there were statistically significant differences between 60 and 100 segments, and 100 and 150 segments. The plan of five beams exhibited limited reproducibility. The number of segments had minimal impact on plan reproducibility, but 60 segments sometimes failed to meet dose constraints for online adaptive plan. The optimization and delivery time increased with the number of beams and segments. We do not recommend using five or fewer beams for a reproducible and high‐quality plan in the Unity MRL. In addition, many number of segments and beams may help meet dose constraints during online adaptive plan. Treatment with the Unity MRL should be performed with the appropriate number of beams and segments to achieve a good balance among plan quality, delivery time, and optimization time.