Cargando…
Adapting a practical EPR dosimetry protocol to measure output factors in small fields with alanine
PURPOSE: Modern radiotherapy techniques often deliver small radiation fields. In this work, a practical Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) dosimetry protocol is adapted and applied to measure output factors (OF) in small fields of a 6 MV radiotherapy system. Correction factors and uncertainties a...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10691647/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37922380 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.14191 |
Sumario: | PURPOSE: Modern radiotherapy techniques often deliver small radiation fields. In this work, a practical Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) dosimetry protocol is adapted and applied to measure output factors (OF) in small fields of a 6 MV radiotherapy system. Correction factors and uncertainties are presented and OFs are compared to the values obtained by following TRS‐483 using an ionization chamber (IC). METHODS: Irradiations were performed at 10 cm depth inside a water phantom positioned at 90 cm source to surface distance with a 6 MV flattening filter free photon beam of a Halcyon radiotherapy system. OFs for different nominal field sizes (1 × 1, 2 × 2, 3 × 3, 4 × 4, normalized to 10 × 10 cm(2)) were determined with a PinPoint 3D (PTW 31022) IC following TRS‐483 as well as with alanine pellets with a diameter of 4 mm and a height of 2.4 mm. EPR readout was performed with a benchtop X‐band spectrometer. Correction factors due to volume averaging and due to positional uncertainties were derived from 2D film measurements. RESULTS: OFs obtained from both dosimeter types agreed within 0.7% after applying corrections for the volume averaging effect. For the used alanine pellets, volume averaging correction factors of 1.030(2) for the 1 × 1 cm(2) field and <1.002 for the larger field sizes were determined. The correction factor for positional uncertainties of 1 mm was in the order of 1.018 for the 1 × 1 cm(2) field. Combined relative standard uncertainties u(c) for the OFs resulting from alanine measurements were estimated to be below 1.5% for all field sizes. For IC measurements, u(c) was estimated to be below 1.0%. CONCLUSIONS: A practical EPR dosimetry protocol is adaptable for precisely measuring OFs in small fields down to 1 × 1 cm(2). It is recommended to consider the effect of positional uncertainties for field sizes <2 × 2 cm(2). |
---|