Cargando…

Systematic Appraisal of Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Choledocholithiasis

BACKGROUND: To systematically evaluate the methodological quality of the current up-to-date guidelines pertaining to choledocholithiasis, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of key recommendations and corresponding evidence, focusing on the heterogeneity among these guidelines. METHOD: Systematic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhu, Shu-Yao, Huang, Jie, Li, Ying-Jia, Zhou, Bo, Zheng, Cai-Ying, Sun, Da-Li, Fu, Yan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10691658/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37750709
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000001230
_version_ 1785152780840730624
author Zhu, Shu-Yao
Huang, Jie
Li, Ying-Jia
Zhou, Bo
Zheng, Cai-Ying
Sun, Da-Li
Fu, Yan
author_facet Zhu, Shu-Yao
Huang, Jie
Li, Ying-Jia
Zhou, Bo
Zheng, Cai-Ying
Sun, Da-Li
Fu, Yan
author_sort Zhu, Shu-Yao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To systematically evaluate the methodological quality of the current up-to-date guidelines pertaining to choledocholithiasis, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of key recommendations and corresponding evidence, focusing on the heterogeneity among these guidelines. METHOD: Systematic searches across various databases were performed to identify the latest guidelines. The identified guidelines, which met the inclusion criteria, underwent evaluation using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) tool. The key recommendations and evidence from the included guidelines were extracted and reclassified using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (OCEBM) grading system, and the obtained results were analyzed. RESULTS: Nine guidelines related to choledocholithiasis were included in this study, out of which 4 achieved an overall standardized score of more than 60%, indicating their suitability for recommendation. Upon closer examination of the main recommendations within these guidelines, we discovered significant discrepancies concerning the utilization of similar treatment techniques for different diseases or different treatment methods under comparable conditions, and discrepancies in the recommended treatment duration. High-quality research evidence was lacking, and some recommendations either failed to provide supporting evidence or cited inappropriate and low-level evidence. CONCLUSION: The quality of guidelines pertaining to choledocholithiasis is uneven. Recommendations for the treatment of choledocholithiasis demonstrate considerable disparities among the guidelines, particularly regarding the utilization of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography as a treatment method and the management approaches for difficult stone cases. Improvements by guideline developers for these factors contributing to the heterogeneity would be a reasonable approach to further update the guidelines for cholangiolithiasis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10691658
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106916582023-12-02 Systematic Appraisal of Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Choledocholithiasis Zhu, Shu-Yao Huang, Jie Li, Ying-Jia Zhou, Bo Zheng, Cai-Ying Sun, Da-Li Fu, Yan Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech Review Articles BACKGROUND: To systematically evaluate the methodological quality of the current up-to-date guidelines pertaining to choledocholithiasis, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of key recommendations and corresponding evidence, focusing on the heterogeneity among these guidelines. METHOD: Systematic searches across various databases were performed to identify the latest guidelines. The identified guidelines, which met the inclusion criteria, underwent evaluation using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) tool. The key recommendations and evidence from the included guidelines were extracted and reclassified using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (OCEBM) grading system, and the obtained results were analyzed. RESULTS: Nine guidelines related to choledocholithiasis were included in this study, out of which 4 achieved an overall standardized score of more than 60%, indicating their suitability for recommendation. Upon closer examination of the main recommendations within these guidelines, we discovered significant discrepancies concerning the utilization of similar treatment techniques for different diseases or different treatment methods under comparable conditions, and discrepancies in the recommended treatment duration. High-quality research evidence was lacking, and some recommendations either failed to provide supporting evidence or cited inappropriate and low-level evidence. CONCLUSION: The quality of guidelines pertaining to choledocholithiasis is uneven. Recommendations for the treatment of choledocholithiasis demonstrate considerable disparities among the guidelines, particularly regarding the utilization of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography as a treatment method and the management approaches for difficult stone cases. Improvements by guideline developers for these factors contributing to the heterogeneity would be a reasonable approach to further update the guidelines for cholangiolithiasis. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10691658/ /pubmed/37750709 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000001230 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Review Articles
Zhu, Shu-Yao
Huang, Jie
Li, Ying-Jia
Zhou, Bo
Zheng, Cai-Ying
Sun, Da-Li
Fu, Yan
Systematic Appraisal of Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Choledocholithiasis
title Systematic Appraisal of Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Choledocholithiasis
title_full Systematic Appraisal of Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Choledocholithiasis
title_fullStr Systematic Appraisal of Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Choledocholithiasis
title_full_unstemmed Systematic Appraisal of Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Choledocholithiasis
title_short Systematic Appraisal of Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Choledocholithiasis
title_sort systematic appraisal of guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of choledocholithiasis
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10691658/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37750709
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000001230
work_keys_str_mv AT zhushuyao systematicappraisalofguidelinesforthediagnosisandtreatmentofcholedocholithiasis
AT huangjie systematicappraisalofguidelinesforthediagnosisandtreatmentofcholedocholithiasis
AT liyingjia systematicappraisalofguidelinesforthediagnosisandtreatmentofcholedocholithiasis
AT zhoubo systematicappraisalofguidelinesforthediagnosisandtreatmentofcholedocholithiasis
AT zhengcaiying systematicappraisalofguidelinesforthediagnosisandtreatmentofcholedocholithiasis
AT sundali systematicappraisalofguidelinesforthediagnosisandtreatmentofcholedocholithiasis
AT fuyan systematicappraisalofguidelinesforthediagnosisandtreatmentofcholedocholithiasis