Cargando…
Systematic Appraisal of Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Choledocholithiasis
BACKGROUND: To systematically evaluate the methodological quality of the current up-to-date guidelines pertaining to choledocholithiasis, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of key recommendations and corresponding evidence, focusing on the heterogeneity among these guidelines. METHOD: Systematic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10691658/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37750709 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000001230 |
_version_ | 1785152780840730624 |
---|---|
author | Zhu, Shu-Yao Huang, Jie Li, Ying-Jia Zhou, Bo Zheng, Cai-Ying Sun, Da-Li Fu, Yan |
author_facet | Zhu, Shu-Yao Huang, Jie Li, Ying-Jia Zhou, Bo Zheng, Cai-Ying Sun, Da-Li Fu, Yan |
author_sort | Zhu, Shu-Yao |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To systematically evaluate the methodological quality of the current up-to-date guidelines pertaining to choledocholithiasis, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of key recommendations and corresponding evidence, focusing on the heterogeneity among these guidelines. METHOD: Systematic searches across various databases were performed to identify the latest guidelines. The identified guidelines, which met the inclusion criteria, underwent evaluation using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) tool. The key recommendations and evidence from the included guidelines were extracted and reclassified using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (OCEBM) grading system, and the obtained results were analyzed. RESULTS: Nine guidelines related to choledocholithiasis were included in this study, out of which 4 achieved an overall standardized score of more than 60%, indicating their suitability for recommendation. Upon closer examination of the main recommendations within these guidelines, we discovered significant discrepancies concerning the utilization of similar treatment techniques for different diseases or different treatment methods under comparable conditions, and discrepancies in the recommended treatment duration. High-quality research evidence was lacking, and some recommendations either failed to provide supporting evidence or cited inappropriate and low-level evidence. CONCLUSION: The quality of guidelines pertaining to choledocholithiasis is uneven. Recommendations for the treatment of choledocholithiasis demonstrate considerable disparities among the guidelines, particularly regarding the utilization of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography as a treatment method and the management approaches for difficult stone cases. Improvements by guideline developers for these factors contributing to the heterogeneity would be a reasonable approach to further update the guidelines for cholangiolithiasis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10691658 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106916582023-12-02 Systematic Appraisal of Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Choledocholithiasis Zhu, Shu-Yao Huang, Jie Li, Ying-Jia Zhou, Bo Zheng, Cai-Ying Sun, Da-Li Fu, Yan Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech Review Articles BACKGROUND: To systematically evaluate the methodological quality of the current up-to-date guidelines pertaining to choledocholithiasis, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of key recommendations and corresponding evidence, focusing on the heterogeneity among these guidelines. METHOD: Systematic searches across various databases were performed to identify the latest guidelines. The identified guidelines, which met the inclusion criteria, underwent evaluation using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) tool. The key recommendations and evidence from the included guidelines were extracted and reclassified using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (OCEBM) grading system, and the obtained results were analyzed. RESULTS: Nine guidelines related to choledocholithiasis were included in this study, out of which 4 achieved an overall standardized score of more than 60%, indicating their suitability for recommendation. Upon closer examination of the main recommendations within these guidelines, we discovered significant discrepancies concerning the utilization of similar treatment techniques for different diseases or different treatment methods under comparable conditions, and discrepancies in the recommended treatment duration. High-quality research evidence was lacking, and some recommendations either failed to provide supporting evidence or cited inappropriate and low-level evidence. CONCLUSION: The quality of guidelines pertaining to choledocholithiasis is uneven. Recommendations for the treatment of choledocholithiasis demonstrate considerable disparities among the guidelines, particularly regarding the utilization of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography as a treatment method and the management approaches for difficult stone cases. Improvements by guideline developers for these factors contributing to the heterogeneity would be a reasonable approach to further update the guidelines for cholangiolithiasis. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10691658/ /pubmed/37750709 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000001230 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | Review Articles Zhu, Shu-Yao Huang, Jie Li, Ying-Jia Zhou, Bo Zheng, Cai-Ying Sun, Da-Li Fu, Yan Systematic Appraisal of Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Choledocholithiasis |
title | Systematic Appraisal of Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Choledocholithiasis |
title_full | Systematic Appraisal of Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Choledocholithiasis |
title_fullStr | Systematic Appraisal of Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Choledocholithiasis |
title_full_unstemmed | Systematic Appraisal of Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Choledocholithiasis |
title_short | Systematic Appraisal of Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Choledocholithiasis |
title_sort | systematic appraisal of guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of choledocholithiasis |
topic | Review Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10691658/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37750709 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000001230 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhushuyao systematicappraisalofguidelinesforthediagnosisandtreatmentofcholedocholithiasis AT huangjie systematicappraisalofguidelinesforthediagnosisandtreatmentofcholedocholithiasis AT liyingjia systematicappraisalofguidelinesforthediagnosisandtreatmentofcholedocholithiasis AT zhoubo systematicappraisalofguidelinesforthediagnosisandtreatmentofcholedocholithiasis AT zhengcaiying systematicappraisalofguidelinesforthediagnosisandtreatmentofcholedocholithiasis AT sundali systematicappraisalofguidelinesforthediagnosisandtreatmentofcholedocholithiasis AT fuyan systematicappraisalofguidelinesforthediagnosisandtreatmentofcholedocholithiasis |