Cargando…

Biparametric Quantitative MRI for Prostate Cancer Detection

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to prospectively investigate a novel quantitative biparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocol to detect prostate cancer (PCa) in biopsy-naïve men. Secondarily, this study reports the accuracy of fractional order calculus (FROC) diffusion and quantita...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Uyanik, Meltem, Vigneswaran, Hari T., Hale, Graham R., Gann, Peter, Magin, Richard, Abern, Michael R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10691659/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/RMR.0000000000000308
_version_ 1785152781084000256
author Uyanik, Meltem
Vigneswaran, Hari T.
Hale, Graham R.
Gann, Peter
Magin, Richard
Abern, Michael R.
author_facet Uyanik, Meltem
Vigneswaran, Hari T.
Hale, Graham R.
Gann, Peter
Magin, Richard
Abern, Michael R.
author_sort Uyanik, Meltem
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This study sought to prospectively investigate a novel quantitative biparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocol to detect prostate cancer (PCa) in biopsy-naïve men. Secondarily, this study reports the accuracy of fractional order calculus (FROC) diffusion and quantitative T2 compared with the Prostate Imaging Reporting & Data System (PI-RADS). METHODS: This prospective pilot study (NCT04175730) enrolled 50 prostate biopsy-naïve men who met eligibility criteria. All men received 3T MRI with T2 and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) (b-values: 50–4,000 s/mm(2)). Men with PI-RADS lesions ≥3 underwent targeted and systematic prostate biopsy, omitting systematic biopsy cores in peripheral zone lesions. DWI series images were fit to signal decay to calculate ADC (mm(2)/s) and the FROC model for coefficient D(F) (mm(2)/s). The primary end point was detection of Gleason grade group ≥2 (GG≥2) PCa. Receiver operating characteristic regression and area under the curve (AUC) were reported. RESULTS: Forty-eight men underwent MRI and biopsy. Mean age was 61.5 years (56–68), 29% were White, 52% were African American, mean PSA was 6.0 ng/mL (4.9–8.0), and mean PSA density was 0.14 ng/mL(2). In total, 61 PI-RADS ≥3 lesions were targeted for biopsy. GG≥2 PC was found in 7% (1/14) of PI-RADS 3 lesions, 28% (10/36) of PI-RADS 4 lesions, and 36% (4/11) of PI-RADS 5 lesions. The AUC for detection of GG≥2 PC was 0.63 (0.5–0.76) for PI-RADS, 0.82 (0.68–0.96) for ADC, and 0.87 (0.77–0.97) for the FROC model. CONCLUSION: This small prospective pilot study demonstrates the feasibility of a novel quantitative biparametic MRI protocol to detect prostate cancer in biopsy-naïve men.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10691659
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Wolters Kluwer
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106916592023-12-02 Biparametric Quantitative MRI for Prostate Cancer Detection Uyanik, Meltem Vigneswaran, Hari T. Hale, Graham R. Gann, Peter Magin, Richard Abern, Michael R. Top Magn Reson Imaging Original Article OBJECTIVES: This study sought to prospectively investigate a novel quantitative biparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocol to detect prostate cancer (PCa) in biopsy-naïve men. Secondarily, this study reports the accuracy of fractional order calculus (FROC) diffusion and quantitative T2 compared with the Prostate Imaging Reporting & Data System (PI-RADS). METHODS: This prospective pilot study (NCT04175730) enrolled 50 prostate biopsy-naïve men who met eligibility criteria. All men received 3T MRI with T2 and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) (b-values: 50–4,000 s/mm(2)). Men with PI-RADS lesions ≥3 underwent targeted and systematic prostate biopsy, omitting systematic biopsy cores in peripheral zone lesions. DWI series images were fit to signal decay to calculate ADC (mm(2)/s) and the FROC model for coefficient D(F) (mm(2)/s). The primary end point was detection of Gleason grade group ≥2 (GG≥2) PCa. Receiver operating characteristic regression and area under the curve (AUC) were reported. RESULTS: Forty-eight men underwent MRI and biopsy. Mean age was 61.5 years (56–68), 29% were White, 52% were African American, mean PSA was 6.0 ng/mL (4.9–8.0), and mean PSA density was 0.14 ng/mL(2). In total, 61 PI-RADS ≥3 lesions were targeted for biopsy. GG≥2 PC was found in 7% (1/14) of PI-RADS 3 lesions, 28% (10/36) of PI-RADS 4 lesions, and 36% (4/11) of PI-RADS 5 lesions. The AUC for detection of GG≥2 PC was 0.63 (0.5–0.76) for PI-RADS, 0.82 (0.68–0.96) for ADC, and 0.87 (0.77–0.97) for the FROC model. CONCLUSION: This small prospective pilot study demonstrates the feasibility of a novel quantitative biparametic MRI protocol to detect prostate cancer in biopsy-naïve men. Wolters Kluwer 2023-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10691659/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/RMR.0000000000000308 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Original Article
Uyanik, Meltem
Vigneswaran, Hari T.
Hale, Graham R.
Gann, Peter
Magin, Richard
Abern, Michael R.
Biparametric Quantitative MRI for Prostate Cancer Detection
title Biparametric Quantitative MRI for Prostate Cancer Detection
title_full Biparametric Quantitative MRI for Prostate Cancer Detection
title_fullStr Biparametric Quantitative MRI for Prostate Cancer Detection
title_full_unstemmed Biparametric Quantitative MRI for Prostate Cancer Detection
title_short Biparametric Quantitative MRI for Prostate Cancer Detection
title_sort biparametric quantitative mri for prostate cancer detection
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10691659/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/RMR.0000000000000308
work_keys_str_mv AT uyanikmeltem biparametricquantitativemriforprostatecancerdetection
AT vigneswaranharit biparametricquantitativemriforprostatecancerdetection
AT halegrahamr biparametricquantitativemriforprostatecancerdetection
AT gannpeter biparametricquantitativemriforprostatecancerdetection
AT maginrichard biparametricquantitativemriforprostatecancerdetection
AT abernmichaelr biparametricquantitativemriforprostatecancerdetection