Cargando…

Systemic pharmacological treatment of digital ulcers in systemic sclerosis: a systematic literature review

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the evidence concerning systemic pharmacological treatments for SSc digital ulcers (DUs) to inform the development of evidence-based treatment guidelines. METHODS: A systematic literature review of seven databases was performed to identify all original research studies of adul...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ross, Laura, Maltez, Nancy, Hughes, Michael, Schoones, Jan W, Baron, Murray, Chung, Lorinda, Giuggioli, Dilia, Moinzadeh, Pia, Suliman, Yossra A, Campochiaro, Corrado, Allanore, Yannick, Denton, Christopher P, Distler, Oliver, Frech, Tracy, Furst, Daniel E, Khanna, Dinesh, Krieg, Thomas, Kuwana, Masataka, Matucci-Cerinic, Marco, Pope, Janet, Alunno, Alessia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10691932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37335850
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kead289
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the evidence concerning systemic pharmacological treatments for SSc digital ulcers (DUs) to inform the development of evidence-based treatment guidelines. METHODS: A systematic literature review of seven databases was performed to identify all original research studies of adult patients with SSc DUs. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective longitudinal observational studies (OBSs) were eligible for inclusion. Data were extracted, applying the patient, intervention, comparison, outcome framework, and risk of bias (RoB) was assessed. Due to study heterogeneity, narrative summaries were used to present data. RESULTS: Forty-seven studies that evaluated the treatment efficacy or safety of pharmacological therapies were identified among 4250 references. Data from 18 RCTs of 1927 patients and 29 OBSs of 661 patients, at various RoB (total 2588 patients) showed that i.v. iloprost, phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors and atorvastatin are effective for the treatment of active DUs. Bosentan reduced the rate of future DUs in two RCTs (moderate RoB) and eight OBSs at low to high RoB. Two small studies (moderate RoB) indicate that Janus kinase inhibitors may be effective for the treatment of active DUs, otherwise there are no data to support the use of immunosuppression or anti-platelet agents in the management of DUs. CONCLUSION: There are several systemic treatments, across four medication classes, that are effective therapies for the management of SSc DUs. However, a lack of robust data means it is not possible to define the optimal treatment regimen for SSc DUs. The relatively low quality of evidence available has highlighted further areas of research need.