Cargando…

Value of stent boost imaging in decision making after coronary stenting

Background: Several studies reported the comparability of digital stent enhancement techniques (including stent boost imaging) in detecting suboptimal results of coronary stenting with Intra Vascular Ultrasound and optical coherence tomography. Aims: to assess results of stent deployment and determi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mansour, Hossam M., Mohamed, Ahmed M., Ibrahim, Soliman G., Ibrahim, Ayman M., Mohamed, Ramadan G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10692007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37845408
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-023-02961-4
_version_ 1785152848596566016
author Mansour, Hossam M.
Mohamed, Ahmed M.
Ibrahim, Soliman G.
Ibrahim, Ayman M.
Mohamed, Ramadan G.
author_facet Mansour, Hossam M.
Mohamed, Ahmed M.
Ibrahim, Soliman G.
Ibrahim, Ayman M.
Mohamed, Ramadan G.
author_sort Mansour, Hossam M.
collection PubMed
description Background: Several studies reported the comparability of digital stent enhancement techniques (including stent boost imaging) in detecting suboptimal results of coronary stenting with Intra Vascular Ultrasound and optical coherence tomography. Aims: to assess results of stent deployment and determine the incidence of suboptimal results requiring changing final decision using stent boost imaging. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 120 patients eligible for PCI were recruited during a period of one year (January 2021 to 2022) using DES. Results: Suboptimal results were found in 38% of the PCI cases with stents (angiography guided). Importantly it was found that improper lesion preparation in our practice could not help improving stent optimization. Also, angiography guided PCI has significant incidence of suboptimal results. Digital stent enhancement techniques like stent boost have significant and important value in better decision making. After adjusting for age and sex, six factors were identified as independent predictors for final decision change (stent length, LAD/RCA affection, proximal segment affection, calcification, and optical coherence tomography. Conclusion: This study has confirmed the utility of stent boost for the optimization of PCI in daily practice. Stent Boost is a simple and costless technique that provides an accurate assessment of a deployed stent without extending the procedure time and without more risk. It appears to be useful for the immediate evaluation of stent expansion and optimization of PCI by additional post-dilatation, when appropriate. Future studies are needed to determine whether Stent Boost data will correlate with adverse long-term clinical outcomes in patients undergoing PCI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10692007
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106920072023-12-03 Value of stent boost imaging in decision making after coronary stenting Mansour, Hossam M. Mohamed, Ahmed M. Ibrahim, Soliman G. Ibrahim, Ayman M. Mohamed, Ramadan G. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Original Paper Background: Several studies reported the comparability of digital stent enhancement techniques (including stent boost imaging) in detecting suboptimal results of coronary stenting with Intra Vascular Ultrasound and optical coherence tomography. Aims: to assess results of stent deployment and determine the incidence of suboptimal results requiring changing final decision using stent boost imaging. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 120 patients eligible for PCI were recruited during a period of one year (January 2021 to 2022) using DES. Results: Suboptimal results were found in 38% of the PCI cases with stents (angiography guided). Importantly it was found that improper lesion preparation in our practice could not help improving stent optimization. Also, angiography guided PCI has significant incidence of suboptimal results. Digital stent enhancement techniques like stent boost have significant and important value in better decision making. After adjusting for age and sex, six factors were identified as independent predictors for final decision change (stent length, LAD/RCA affection, proximal segment affection, calcification, and optical coherence tomography. Conclusion: This study has confirmed the utility of stent boost for the optimization of PCI in daily practice. Stent Boost is a simple and costless technique that provides an accurate assessment of a deployed stent without extending the procedure time and without more risk. It appears to be useful for the immediate evaluation of stent expansion and optimization of PCI by additional post-dilatation, when appropriate. Future studies are needed to determine whether Stent Boost data will correlate with adverse long-term clinical outcomes in patients undergoing PCI. Springer Netherlands 2023-10-17 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10692007/ /pubmed/37845408 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-023-02961-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Paper
Mansour, Hossam M.
Mohamed, Ahmed M.
Ibrahim, Soliman G.
Ibrahim, Ayman M.
Mohamed, Ramadan G.
Value of stent boost imaging in decision making after coronary stenting
title Value of stent boost imaging in decision making after coronary stenting
title_full Value of stent boost imaging in decision making after coronary stenting
title_fullStr Value of stent boost imaging in decision making after coronary stenting
title_full_unstemmed Value of stent boost imaging in decision making after coronary stenting
title_short Value of stent boost imaging in decision making after coronary stenting
title_sort value of stent boost imaging in decision making after coronary stenting
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10692007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37845408
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-023-02961-4
work_keys_str_mv AT mansourhossamm valueofstentboostimagingindecisionmakingaftercoronarystenting
AT mohamedahmedm valueofstentboostimagingindecisionmakingaftercoronarystenting
AT ibrahimsolimang valueofstentboostimagingindecisionmakingaftercoronarystenting
AT ibrahimaymanm valueofstentboostimagingindecisionmakingaftercoronarystenting
AT mohamedramadang valueofstentboostimagingindecisionmakingaftercoronarystenting