Cargando…
Real-world retention rates of biologics in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
Although biologics have their own characteristics, there are no clear criteria for selecting them to treat the patients with rheumatoid arthritis. To assist in selecting biologics, we investigated the retention rates of biologics at our institution. We examined retention rates, and reasons for dropo...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10692158/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38040839 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-48537-z |
_version_ | 1785152882133172224 |
---|---|
author | Takami, Kenji Tsuji, Shigeyoshi |
author_facet | Takami, Kenji Tsuji, Shigeyoshi |
author_sort | Takami, Kenji |
collection | PubMed |
description | Although biologics have their own characteristics, there are no clear criteria for selecting them to treat the patients with rheumatoid arthritis. To assist in selecting biologics, we investigated the retention rates of biologics at our institution. We examined retention rates, and reasons for dropout for biologics in 393 cases and 605 prescriptions (of which 378 prescriptions were as naive) at our hospital since October 2003. Throughout the entire course of the study, etanercept (ETN) was the most frequently used biologic, followed by adalimumab (ADA) and tocilizumab (TCZ). When narrowed down to the later period from 2010, ETN was still the most used, followed by TCZ and abatacept (ABT). When the retention rates were compared in biologic naive patients, the retention rates were TCZ, ABT, ETN, certolizumab pegol (CZP), golimumab (GLM), infliximab (IFX), and ADA, in that order. The retention rates were better with the first use of each biologic. The main reasons for dropout were primary ineffectiveness, secondary ineffectiveness, and infection. ETN was the most used biologic in our hospital, with an increasing trend toward the use of non-TNF inhibitors. Retention rates were higher in non-TNF inhibitors. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10692158 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106921582023-12-03 Real-world retention rates of biologics in patients with rheumatoid arthritis Takami, Kenji Tsuji, Shigeyoshi Sci Rep Article Although biologics have their own characteristics, there are no clear criteria for selecting them to treat the patients with rheumatoid arthritis. To assist in selecting biologics, we investigated the retention rates of biologics at our institution. We examined retention rates, and reasons for dropout for biologics in 393 cases and 605 prescriptions (of which 378 prescriptions were as naive) at our hospital since October 2003. Throughout the entire course of the study, etanercept (ETN) was the most frequently used biologic, followed by adalimumab (ADA) and tocilizumab (TCZ). When narrowed down to the later period from 2010, ETN was still the most used, followed by TCZ and abatacept (ABT). When the retention rates were compared in biologic naive patients, the retention rates were TCZ, ABT, ETN, certolizumab pegol (CZP), golimumab (GLM), infliximab (IFX), and ADA, in that order. The retention rates were better with the first use of each biologic. The main reasons for dropout were primary ineffectiveness, secondary ineffectiveness, and infection. ETN was the most used biologic in our hospital, with an increasing trend toward the use of non-TNF inhibitors. Retention rates were higher in non-TNF inhibitors. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10692158/ /pubmed/38040839 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-48537-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Takami, Kenji Tsuji, Shigeyoshi Real-world retention rates of biologics in patients with rheumatoid arthritis |
title | Real-world retention rates of biologics in patients with rheumatoid arthritis |
title_full | Real-world retention rates of biologics in patients with rheumatoid arthritis |
title_fullStr | Real-world retention rates of biologics in patients with rheumatoid arthritis |
title_full_unstemmed | Real-world retention rates of biologics in patients with rheumatoid arthritis |
title_short | Real-world retention rates of biologics in patients with rheumatoid arthritis |
title_sort | real-world retention rates of biologics in patients with rheumatoid arthritis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10692158/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38040839 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-48537-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT takamikenji realworldretentionratesofbiologicsinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis AT tsujishigeyoshi realworldretentionratesofbiologicsinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis |