Cargando…

Real-world retention rates of biologics in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Although biologics have their own characteristics, there are no clear criteria for selecting them to treat the patients with rheumatoid arthritis. To assist in selecting biologics, we investigated the retention rates of biologics at our institution. We examined retention rates, and reasons for dropo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Takami, Kenji, Tsuji, Shigeyoshi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10692158/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38040839
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-48537-z
_version_ 1785152882133172224
author Takami, Kenji
Tsuji, Shigeyoshi
author_facet Takami, Kenji
Tsuji, Shigeyoshi
author_sort Takami, Kenji
collection PubMed
description Although biologics have their own characteristics, there are no clear criteria for selecting them to treat the patients with rheumatoid arthritis. To assist in selecting biologics, we investigated the retention rates of biologics at our institution. We examined retention rates, and reasons for dropout for biologics in 393 cases and 605 prescriptions (of which 378 prescriptions were as naive) at our hospital since October 2003. Throughout the entire course of the study, etanercept (ETN) was the most frequently used biologic, followed by adalimumab (ADA) and tocilizumab (TCZ). When narrowed down to the later period from 2010, ETN was still the most used, followed by TCZ and abatacept (ABT). When the retention rates were compared in biologic naive patients, the retention rates were TCZ, ABT, ETN, certolizumab pegol (CZP), golimumab (GLM), infliximab (IFX), and ADA, in that order. The retention rates were better with the first use of each biologic. The main reasons for dropout were primary ineffectiveness, secondary ineffectiveness, and infection. ETN was the most used biologic in our hospital, with an increasing trend toward the use of non-TNF inhibitors. Retention rates were higher in non-TNF inhibitors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10692158
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106921582023-12-03 Real-world retention rates of biologics in patients with rheumatoid arthritis Takami, Kenji Tsuji, Shigeyoshi Sci Rep Article Although biologics have their own characteristics, there are no clear criteria for selecting them to treat the patients with rheumatoid arthritis. To assist in selecting biologics, we investigated the retention rates of biologics at our institution. We examined retention rates, and reasons for dropout for biologics in 393 cases and 605 prescriptions (of which 378 prescriptions were as naive) at our hospital since October 2003. Throughout the entire course of the study, etanercept (ETN) was the most frequently used biologic, followed by adalimumab (ADA) and tocilizumab (TCZ). When narrowed down to the later period from 2010, ETN was still the most used, followed by TCZ and abatacept (ABT). When the retention rates were compared in biologic naive patients, the retention rates were TCZ, ABT, ETN, certolizumab pegol (CZP), golimumab (GLM), infliximab (IFX), and ADA, in that order. The retention rates were better with the first use of each biologic. The main reasons for dropout were primary ineffectiveness, secondary ineffectiveness, and infection. ETN was the most used biologic in our hospital, with an increasing trend toward the use of non-TNF inhibitors. Retention rates were higher in non-TNF inhibitors. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10692158/ /pubmed/38040839 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-48537-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Takami, Kenji
Tsuji, Shigeyoshi
Real-world retention rates of biologics in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
title Real-world retention rates of biologics in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
title_full Real-world retention rates of biologics in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
title_fullStr Real-world retention rates of biologics in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
title_full_unstemmed Real-world retention rates of biologics in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
title_short Real-world retention rates of biologics in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
title_sort real-world retention rates of biologics in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10692158/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38040839
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-48537-z
work_keys_str_mv AT takamikenji realworldretentionratesofbiologicsinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis
AT tsujishigeyoshi realworldretentionratesofbiologicsinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis