Cargando…

Faecal diversion system usage in an adult intensive care unit

Objective: To determine the frequency, indications and complications associated with the use of faecal diversion systems (rectal tubes) in critically ill patients. Design: A single centre observational study over 15 months. Setting: Intensive care unit (ICU). Participants: Patients admitted during t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wilson, Nicholas, Bellomo, Rinaldo, Hay, Tyler, Fazio, Timothy, Entwistle, Jasmine, Presneill, Jeffrey J., Abdelhamid, Yasmine Ali, Deane, Adam M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10692465/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32389107
http://dx.doi.org/10.51893/2020.2.oa5
_version_ 1785152947240304640
author Wilson, Nicholas
Bellomo, Rinaldo
Hay, Tyler
Fazio, Timothy
Entwistle, Jasmine
Presneill, Jeffrey J.
Abdelhamid, Yasmine Ali
Deane, Adam M.
author_facet Wilson, Nicholas
Bellomo, Rinaldo
Hay, Tyler
Fazio, Timothy
Entwistle, Jasmine
Presneill, Jeffrey J.
Abdelhamid, Yasmine Ali
Deane, Adam M.
author_sort Wilson, Nicholas
collection PubMed
description Objective: To determine the frequency, indications and complications associated with the use of faecal diversion systems (rectal tubes) in critically ill patients. Design: A single centre observational study over 15 months. Setting: Intensive care unit (ICU). Participants: Patients admitted during this period. Main outcome measures: Frequency of rectal tubes utilisation in ICU, as well as associated adverse events, with major events defined as lower gastrointestinal bleeding associated with defined blood transfusion of two or more units of red cells or endoscopy or surgical intervention. Results: Of 3418 admission episodes, there were 111 episodes of rectal tubes inserted in 99 patients. Rectal tubes remained indwelling for a median of 5 days (range, 1–23) for a total of 641 patient-days. The most frequent indication for insertion was excessive bowel motions. A major adverse event was observed in three patients (3%; 0.5 events per 100 device days). Two patients underwent laparotomy and one patient sigmoidoscopy. These patients received between two and 23 units of packed red blood cells. Patients who had a rectal tube inserted had a substantially greater duration of ICU admission (mean, 14 days [SD, 14] v 2.8 days [SD, 3.7]) and hospital mortality (15% v 7.7%; risk ratio, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.2–3.4) as well as an overall higher Australian and New Zealand Risk of Death (ANZROD) score (mean, 27 [SD, 22] v 12.6 [SD, 20]). Conclusion: Rectal tubes appear to be frequently inserted and can lead to major adverse events in critically ill patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10692465
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106924652023-12-03 Faecal diversion system usage in an adult intensive care unit Wilson, Nicholas Bellomo, Rinaldo Hay, Tyler Fazio, Timothy Entwistle, Jasmine Presneill, Jeffrey J. Abdelhamid, Yasmine Ali Deane, Adam M. Crit Care Resusc Original Articles Objective: To determine the frequency, indications and complications associated with the use of faecal diversion systems (rectal tubes) in critically ill patients. Design: A single centre observational study over 15 months. Setting: Intensive care unit (ICU). Participants: Patients admitted during this period. Main outcome measures: Frequency of rectal tubes utilisation in ICU, as well as associated adverse events, with major events defined as lower gastrointestinal bleeding associated with defined blood transfusion of two or more units of red cells or endoscopy or surgical intervention. Results: Of 3418 admission episodes, there were 111 episodes of rectal tubes inserted in 99 patients. Rectal tubes remained indwelling for a median of 5 days (range, 1–23) for a total of 641 patient-days. The most frequent indication for insertion was excessive bowel motions. A major adverse event was observed in three patients (3%; 0.5 events per 100 device days). Two patients underwent laparotomy and one patient sigmoidoscopy. These patients received between two and 23 units of packed red blood cells. Patients who had a rectal tube inserted had a substantially greater duration of ICU admission (mean, 14 days [SD, 14] v 2.8 days [SD, 3.7]) and hospital mortality (15% v 7.7%; risk ratio, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.2–3.4) as well as an overall higher Australian and New Zealand Risk of Death (ANZROD) score (mean, 27 [SD, 22] v 12.6 [SD, 20]). Conclusion: Rectal tubes appear to be frequently inserted and can lead to major adverse events in critically ill patients. Elsevier 2023-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10692465/ /pubmed/32389107 http://dx.doi.org/10.51893/2020.2.oa5 Text en © 2020 College of Intensive Care Medicine of Australia and New Zealand. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Wilson, Nicholas
Bellomo, Rinaldo
Hay, Tyler
Fazio, Timothy
Entwistle, Jasmine
Presneill, Jeffrey J.
Abdelhamid, Yasmine Ali
Deane, Adam M.
Faecal diversion system usage in an adult intensive care unit
title Faecal diversion system usage in an adult intensive care unit
title_full Faecal diversion system usage in an adult intensive care unit
title_fullStr Faecal diversion system usage in an adult intensive care unit
title_full_unstemmed Faecal diversion system usage in an adult intensive care unit
title_short Faecal diversion system usage in an adult intensive care unit
title_sort faecal diversion system usage in an adult intensive care unit
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10692465/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32389107
http://dx.doi.org/10.51893/2020.2.oa5
work_keys_str_mv AT wilsonnicholas faecaldiversionsystemusageinanadultintensivecareunit
AT bellomorinaldo faecaldiversionsystemusageinanadultintensivecareunit
AT haytyler faecaldiversionsystemusageinanadultintensivecareunit
AT faziotimothy faecaldiversionsystemusageinanadultintensivecareunit
AT entwistlejasmine faecaldiversionsystemusageinanadultintensivecareunit
AT presneilljeffreyj faecaldiversionsystemusageinanadultintensivecareunit
AT abdelhamidyasmineali faecaldiversionsystemusageinanadultintensivecareunit
AT deaneadamm faecaldiversionsystemusageinanadultintensivecareunit